Abstract
This study investigates the predictive influences of achievement motivational variables that may sustain students’ engagement in physics and influence their future enrolment plans in the subject. Unlike most studies attempting to address the decline of physics enrolments through capturing students’ intention to enrol in physics before ever studying the subject, this study is novel because it captures the perceptions of students currently enrolled in senior secondary physics and their subsequent enrolment intentions after completing modules from the physics curriculum. Participants comprised of senior secondary students in year 11 completing their first year of physics in Australia across nine high schools in New South Wales. The Sustained Enrolment Models for Physics (SEMP), which drew upon the Expectancy-Value (EV) theoretical foundation, proposed predictive relations among students’ achievement motivation, sustained engagement, and enrolment intentions in relation to physics. The data showed a good fit to the theoretically developed model for all four physics topics from the year 11 curriculum. The path coefficients of the models demonstrated the strength of relationships among the variables for each of the topics. The topic specificity of SEMPs allowed the mapping of students’ motivational patterns at a more sensitive level than the domain-specific level and suggested that the relative influence of motivational precursors can vary by topic. This study advanced the EV research knowledge that, while values may be significant, it is the expectancies that largely predict students’ sustained choice intentions in relation to physics. Implications for these findings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (In press). Sustaining young people’s enrolment intentions in relation to physics: Development and validation of a tool. The Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology.
Ainley, M. (2004). What Do We Know about Student Participation and Engagement? Melbourne: Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education.
Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in Science, Mathematics and Technology in Australian Education (Research Monograph No 63). Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research. http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lib/ir/onlineconferences/agse2010/000144.pdf.
Barnes, G. R. (1999). A Motivational Model of Enrolment Intentions in Senior Secondary Science Courses in New South Wales Schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.
Barres, B. A. (2006). Does gender matter? Nature, 442(7099), 133–136. doi:10.1038/442133a.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2013). Schools that make a difference to post-compulsory uptake of physical science subjects: Some comparative case studies in England. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 663–689. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.641131.
Bultitude, K., Grant, L., Daly, A., & Thomson, C. (2010). Girls into physics (invited presentation) diversity in STEM conference. London, UK: Institute of Physics.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471–486. doi:10.1080/0950069042000323746.
Dweck, C. S. (2007). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in mathematics participation (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and Women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135–172. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781.x.
Eccles, J. (1989). Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Bringing young women into math and science. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Eccles, J. S. (2008). Can Middle School Reform Increase High School Graduation Rates?: California Dropout Research Project Report #12.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215–225. doi:10.1177/0146167295213003.
Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgely, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Eccles, J., Barber, B., Updegraff, K., & O'Brien, K. (1998). An Expectancy-Value Model of Achievement Choices: The Role Of Ability Self-Concepts, Perceived Task Utility, and Interest in Predicting Activity Choice and Course Enrolment. In A. Krapp, A. Renninger & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Learning (pp. 267–279): Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel (IPN).
Eccles, J., O’Neill, S., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability Self-Perceptions and Subjective Task Values in Adolescents and Children. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (Vol. 3, pp. 237–249). US: Springer.
Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrolment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-valence framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 381–391.
Fullarton, S., & Ainley, J. (2000). Subject choice by students in year 12 in Australian secondary schools. LSAY research reports. Longitudinal surveys of Australian youth research report. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fullarton, S., Walker, M., Ainley, J., & Hillman, K. (2003). Longitudinal studies of Australian youth: research report 33: Patterns of participation at year 12. Camberwell, Victoria: Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Garg, K., & Gupta, B. (2003). Decline in science education in India: a case study at +2 and undergraduate level. Current Science, 84(9), 1198–1201.
Gill, T., & Bell, J. F. (2013). What factors determine the uptake of a-level physics? International Journal of Science Education, 35(5), 753–772. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.577843.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: an intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002.
Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Goto, M. (2001). ‘Japan’, in International Bureau for Education (IBE). Geneva: IBE, UNESCO.
Hills, A. M. (2008). Foolproof guide to statistics using SPSS. Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson Education.
Hipkins, R., & Bolstad, R. (2005). Staying In Science: Students’ Participation In Secondary Education and on Transition to Tertiary Studies Wellington: New Zealand Council For Educational Research.
Hipkins, R., Roberts, J., Bolstad, R., & Ferral, H. (2006). Staying in science 2: Transition to tertiary study from the perspectives of New Zealand year 13 science students. Report prepared for the New Zealand ministry of research science and technology. Wellington: MoRST.
Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting Girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 447–465. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00010-x.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Kelly, A. (1988). Option choice for girls and boys. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6(1), 5–23.
Khalijah, M. S. (2004). Role of physics community for the development and advancement of physics education in the globalization Era. Indonesian Journal of Physics, 15(1), 7–13.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Krapp, A. (Ed.). (2000). Interest and human development during adolescence: an educational–psychological approach. London: Elsevier.
Krogh, B. L., & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 281–302. doi:10.1080/09500690412331314469.
Levy, I. (2003). 10th Graders' preferences for science specialization in terms of their attitude to the subject. MA: Tel Aviv University.
Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: Putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 285–311. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-9008-z.
Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing Science: Understanding the Declines in Senior High School Science Enrolments. Research Report to the Australian Science Teachers Association: UNE.
Meece, J., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young Adolescents' course enrolment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60–70. citeulike-article-id:1623479.
Millar, V., & Toscano, M. (2006). Girls in Physics. Australian School Innovation in Science,Technology and Mathematics (ASISTM) Project.: Retrieved from :http://www.vicphysics.org/documents/events/ stav2006/A2.ppt
Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2013). What sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK survey. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2979–2998. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.681076.
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls and physics: Continuing barriers to ‘Belonging’. Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 281–305.
Murphy, P., Lunn, S., & Jones, H. (2006). The impact of authentic learning on students' engagement with physics. Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 229–246.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
Rennie, L., & Parker, L. (1996). Placing physics problems in real-life context: Students' reactions and performance. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(1), 55–59.
Russell, V. J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. (n. d.). Schooling Issues Digest: Student Motivation and Engagemen. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/schooling_issues_digest/schooling_issues_digest_motivation_engagement.htm
Russell, J., Mackay, A., & Jane, G. (2003). Messages from the Myrad: Improving the middle years of schooling. Jolimont, Melbourne: IARTV.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.
Science, Technology, Engineering and Math: Education for Global Leadership. (n. d.). Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.ed.gov/stem
Seiler, G. (2005). All My Life I Been Po’: Oral Fluency As A Resource for Science Teaching and Learning. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 141–158). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Spall, K., Barrett, S., Stanisstreet, M., Dickson, D., & Boyes, E. (2003). Undergraduates' views about biology and physics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(2), 193–208.
Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? a critical review. American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.9.950.
Stokking, K. M. (2000). Predicting the choice of physics in secondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1261–1283.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Relations of Expectancies and Values to Students' Math Grades and Intentions. Paper presented at the Paper presented al the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-p.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Willms, J. D., (2003). Student Engagement at School: A Sense Of Belonging And Participation: Results from PISA 2000: OECD
Woods, C. (2008). Factors Predicting High Ability Girls’ Enrolment in Year 11 and 12 Physics and Intermediate Mathematics in Regional and Rural North Queensland. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, Brisbane.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abraham, J., Barker, K. An Expectancy-Value Model for Sustained Enrolment Intentions of Senior Secondary Physics Students. Res Sci Educ 45, 509–526 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9434-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9434-x