Skip to main content
Log in

Credit scores and the performance of newly-listed stocks: an exploration of the Chinese A-share market

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the power of S&P Global Market Intelligence’s CreditModel (CM) scores in explaining the short- and long-run performance of newly-listed Chinese firms. A unique feature of the data arises from such scores being outside the public domain during the study period. Focus on such a period avoids the signalling and self-selection biases that inevitably plague studies delving into the relevance of publicly-announced credit ratings. We find that CM scores exhibit positive association with post-listing buy-and-hold stock returns. Even stronger associations emerge when considering fundamental accounting performance, especially over longer-run horizons. In respect of the listing of Chinese A-share firms, we conjecture that greater alignment between secondary market prices and fundamentals would likely have arisen had such scores been in the public domain during the study period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For background on these recently developed scores, see the following web links: https://www.spcapitaliq.com/ and https://www.spcapitaliq.com/documents/products/CreditModel_v2.pdf.

    Moreover, S&P stipulates (in verbatim) that,

    “S&P Global Ratings does not contribute to or participate in the creation of CreditModel Scores generated by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Lowercase nomenclature is used to differentiate S&P Global Market Intelligence’s Credit Model scores from the credit ratings issued by S&P Global Ratings.”

  2. Gounopoulos et al. (2013, p. 22) report that as of the IPO launch in their study sample, only 131 of 2096 firms listing over the period 1990–2011 possessed formal credit-ratings (=6.25% of available A-listing firms).

  3. Reference to Table 1 (Page 22) in Gounopoulos et al. (2013) reveals that the proportion of IPO issuers with formal credit rating dropped markedly from 2004. This coincides with the emergence of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange SME market, and a flow of smaller, unrated IPOs post-2004. The 2009 opening of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange’s ChiNext board reinforced this trend. CM scores should offer even greater guidance on fundamental value in an environment where formal credit ratings are all but absent.

  4. The data capture CM scores at the point of listing. A CM score is a composite measure determined by S&P in relation to a listing firm’s financials for the 12-month period prior to listing. S&P informs us that the backdated Chinese A-listed issuer CM scores were only accessible to public users from April 2013. Given our 2009–2012 IPO sample-frame, CM scores lay outside the public domain during the initial and early post-listing period for all issuers in our sample-frame.

  5. Cheng and Subramanyam (2008) demonstrate that a firm’s default risk is decreasing in the number of analysts it attracts. Mansi et al. (2011, p. 129) observe that lower bond ratings correspond to greater dispersion in analyst forecasts on issuer prospects.

  6. We also extend analysis of financial accounting data, as reflected in a composite CM score, to a primary-market setting devoid of credit ratings. Findings thus go beyond analysis of how accounting information explains credit rating levels (see Doumpos et al. 2015 for recent examination of this issue).

  7. For the mainland Chinese market-place, see Chi and Padgett (2005a), Gao (2010), Chan and Lo (2011), Tian (2011), Gounopoulos et al. (2013), Jiang et al. (2014) and Song et al. (2014). In relation to the post-IPO performance of A-listed firms, see Chen et al. (2000), Sun and Tong (2003), Chan et al. (2004), Fan et al. (2007), Cai et al. (2008), Chi et al. (2010) and Chan and Lo (2011). For Hong Kong, see McGuinness (2016).

  8. Underpricing is a recurrent theme across listing jurisdictions. For example, Boulton et al. (2010) reveal mean positive initial returns across a range of market settings and periods.

  9. For review of such studies, see Thomadakis et al. (2012, pp. 120–121).

  10. The literature also stresses the importance of VC-backing in relation to initial pricing. Specifically, pre-IPO investors help certify (Megginson and Weiss 1991) and monitor (Barry et al. 1990) issuer quality.

  11. By way of contrast, Ball and Shivakumar (2008) for US and UK new listings report that many firms report fairly conservative pre-IPO earnings numbers. For Chinese A-share IPO firms, Kao et al. (2009) investigate the role of regulations on such entities’ quality of earnings.

  12. See Song et al. (2014) for discussion of the key 2009 IPO reforms instituted in China.

  13. Song et al. (2014), for 948 mainland IPOs pitched between 2006 and 2011, report mean unadjusted initial returns of more than 66%. In marked contrast, McGuinness (2012) finds mean unadjusted initial returns of less than 15% for 269 IPOs launched on Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited between 2005 and 2009.

  14. Special thanks are due Michelle P. Cheong and Clemens Thym of S&P Global Market Intelligence for supplying back-dated CM score data on A-share IPO firms.

  15. http://www.gtadata.com/products/plist.aspx.

  16. Cao et al. (2016) report mean initial returns for 783 Shenzhen-listed IPOs, pitched between the IPO market open of July 2009 and close of November 2012, of just under 37%. Such levels are comparable to those reported in our study for IPOs in each of China’s equity markets, Shanghai and Shenzhen.

  17. As instructive background, Pan et al. (2015) reveal that improvement in Taiwan-listed firms’ disclosure-ratings serves in squeezing adverse selection costs and encouraging subsequent equity issuance. Kisgen (2006) demonstrates that firms are more likely to issue equity than debt if ratings are close to credit rating thresholds. The implication is that equity issuance helps ward-off downgrade for firms narrowly above a threshold, but supports upgrade for those in the upper range of a rating interval.

  18. We thank comment from Michelle P. Cheong in suggesting this alternative credit grouping measure.

References

  • Ahrony J, Jevons-Lee CW, Wong TJ (2000) Financial packaging of IPO firms in China. J Account Res 38(1):103–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Finance 23(4):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An A, Chan KC (2008) Credit ratings and IPO pricing. J Corp Finance 14:584–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball R, Shivakumar L (2008) Earnings quality at initial public offerings. J Account Econ 45:324–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannier CE, Behr P, Guttler A (2010) Rating opaque borrowers: why are unsolicited ratings lower? Rev Finance 14:263–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry CB, Muscarella CJ, Peavy JW, Vetsuypens MR (1990) The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies. J Financ Econ 27:447–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty RP, Ritter JR (1986) Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. J Financ Econ 15:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton TJ, Smart SB, Zutter CJ (2010) IPO underpricing and international corporate governance. J Int Bus Stud 41:206–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley DJ, Jordan BD (2002) Partial adjustment to public information and IPO underpricing. J Financ Quant Anal 37:595–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byoun S, Fulkerson JA, Han SH, Shin YS (2014) Are unsolicited ratings biased? Evidence from long-run stock performance. J Bank Finance 42:326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Liu G, Mase B (2008) The long-run performance of initial public offerings and its determinants: the case of China. Rev Quant Finance Account 30(4):419–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Leng T, Liu B, Megginson W (2016) Institutional bidding in IPO allocation: evidence from China. AFA/ASSA Meeting, 3–5 January 2016, San Francisco. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2016/retrieve.php?pdfid=1537

  • Carter R, Manaster S (1990) Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. J Finance 45:1045–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KC, Lo YL (2011) Credit ratings and long term IPO performance. J Econ Finance 35:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Wang JB, Wei KC (2004) Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOs in China. J Corp Finance 10(3):409–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Firth M, Kim JB (2000) The post-issue market performance of initial public offerings in China’s new stock markets. Rev Quant Finance Account 14(4):319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Marshall BR, Zhang J, Ganesh S (2006) Financial distress predictions in China. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 9(2):317–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M, Subramanyam KR (2008) Analyst following and credit ratings. Contemp Account Res 25(4):1007–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YL, Ouyang Z, Tan W (2009) How regulatory changes affect IPO underpricing in China. China Econ Rev 20:692–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi J, Padgett C (2005a) Short-run underpricing and its characteristics in Chinese initial public offering markets. Res Int Bus Finance 19(1):71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi J, Padgett C (2005b) The performance and long-run characteristics of the Chinese IPO markets. Pac Econ Rev 10(4):451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi J, Wang C, Young M (2010) Long-run outperformance of Chinese initial public offerings. Chin Econ 43(5):62–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou T-K (2013) Information content of credit ratings in pricing of future earnings. Rev Quant Finance Account 40:217–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb SS, Marisetty VB (2010) Information content of IPO grading. J Bank Finance 2010(34):2294–2305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos M, Niklis D, Zopoundis C, Andrioopoulos K (2015) Combining accounting data and a structural model for predicting credit ratings: empirical evidence from European listed firms. J Bank Finance 50:599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuCharme LL, Malatesta PH, Sefcik SE (2001) Earnings management: IPO valuation and subsequent performance. J Account Audit Finance 16(4):369–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan JP, Wong TJ, Zhang TY (2007) Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. J Financ Econ 84(2):330–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y (2010) What comprises IPO initial returns: evidence from the Chinese market. Pac Basin Finance J 18:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gounopoulos D, Guney Y, Xu T (2013) Do credit ratings affect underpricing and volatility? Evidence from Chinese IPOs. Unpublished manuscript. http://www.fma.org/Luxembourg/Papers/CreditRatingChineseIPOs.pdf

  • Guo H, Brooks R (2008) Underpricing of Chinese A-share IPOs and short-run underperformance under the approval system from 2001 to 2005. Int Rev Financ Anal 17(5):984–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib MA, Ljungqvist AP (2001) Underpricing and entrepreneurial wealth losses in IPOs: theory and evidence. Rev Financ Stud 14:433–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson RG, Jaffe JF (1975) “Hot issue” markets. J Finance 30(4):1027–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob J, Agarwalla SK (2012) Mandatory IPO grading: does it help pricing efficiency? Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. Working paper 2012–12–07, December 2012

  • James C, Wier P (1990) Borrowing relationships, intermediation, and the cost of issuing public securities. J Financ Econ 28(1–2):149–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang P, Cai C, Keasey K, Wright M, Zhang Q (2014) The role of venture capitalists in small and medium enterprises IPOs: evidence from China. Int Small Bus J 32(6):619–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao JL, Wu DH, Yang ZF (2009) Regulations, earnings management, and post-IPO performance: the Chinese evidence. J Bank Finance 33(1):63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisgen DJ (2006) Credit ratings and capital structure. J Finance 61(3):1035–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo HC, Wang L-H, Sheu H-J, Li FK (2003) Credit evaluation for small and medium-sized enterprises by the examination of firm specific financial ratios and non-financial variables: evidence from Taiwan. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 6(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland H, Pyle D (1977) Information asymmetries, financial structure and financial intermediation. J Finance 32:371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Malatesta P (2005) Credit ratings and the pricing of seasoned equity offerings. Unpublished manuscript, 2005. http://www.bm.ust.hk/fina/FinanceSymposium/2005Symposium/Papers/PaulMalatesta.pdf

  • Mansi SA, Maxwell WF, Miller DP (2011) Analyst forecast characteristics and the cost of debt. Rev Acc Stud 16:116–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness PB (2012) The role of ‘cornerstone’ investors and the Chinese state in the relative underpricing of state- and privately-controlled IPO firms’. Appl Financ Econ 22(18):1529–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness PB (2016) Post-IPO performance and its association with subscription cascades and issuers’ strategic-political importance. Rev Quant Finance Account 46(2):291–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson WL, Weiss KA (1991) Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. J Finance 66(3):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1987) A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J Finance 62(3):483–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlson JA (1980) Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. J Account Res 18(1):109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan L-H, Lin C-T, Lee S-C, Ho K-C (2015) Information ratings and capital structure. J Corp Finance 31:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon WP-H, Chan KC (2008) An empirical examination of the informational content of credit ratings in China. J Bus Res 61:790–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon WP-H, Chan KC, Firth MA (2013) Does having a credit rating leave less money on the table when raising capital? A study of credit ratings and seasoned equity offerings in China. Pac Basin Finance J 22:88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purnanandam AK, Swaminathan B (2004) Are IPOs really underpriced? Rev Financ Stud 17(3):811–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter J (1984) The “Hot Issue” market of 1980. J Bus 57:215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Tan J, Yi Y (2014) IPO returns in China: underpricing or overvaluation? China J Account Res 7:31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Q, Tong HS (2003) China share issue privatization: the extent of its success. J Financ Econ 70(2):183–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teoh SH, Welch I, Wong TJ (1998) Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. J Finance 53:1935–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomadakis S, Nounis C, Gounopoulos D (2012) Long term performance of Greek IPOs. Eur Financ Manag 18(1):117–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian L (2011) Regulatory underpricing: determinants of Chinese extreme IPO returns. J Empir Finance 18(1):78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S&P Global Market Intelligence for the provision of Credit Model (CM) scores necessary for the completion of this study. This project developed from a request by S&P in February 2014 to assess the power of CM scores in explaining post-IPO performance. Our investigation offers a framework for assessing this question as well as other related themes. We assert that no pecuniary benefit was received from the data supplier for our work, and that our research on the pricing, performance and other effects of the scores was carried-out independently of the data supplier. But we especially thank Clemens Thym, Michelle P. Cheong and Phillip Lee of S&P Global Market Intelligence for earlier discussions, suggestions and input in relation to data queries and CM score construction. Additionally, we express thanks to Daniel Chan and Jack Wong. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for comments rendered on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul B. McGuinness.

Additional information

As an important upfront qualification, we remind readers that the present study’s data focus is on S&P Global Market Intelligence’s CreditModel scores. Consequently, our study does not examine formal credit ratings. Foot note 1 offers further and important specific detail on this point.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Variable definitions

PE_postIPO: :

Price to diluted earnings ratio post IPO

Initial underpricing (FUNDret): :

(Intrinsic value/IPO price) − 1

Intrinsic value is calculated as the value of the company imputed by the industry PE ratio.

Intrinsic value = Earnings before IPO*median industry PE ratio

Market reaction (MARKret)

[(First day closing price/intrinsic value) − 1] − Market return during the same day.

BHAR_ n: :

Abnormal buy-and-hold return from the second day after IPO to n trading days, as adjusted for contemporaneous market return

CAR_ n: :

Cumulative abnormal return from the second day after IPO to n trading days

CM

If CM_Score = ‘bb+’ or CM_Score = ‘bb’:

then score = 4

If CM_Score = ‘bb−’:

then score = 3

If CM_Score = ‘b+’:

then score = 2

If CM_Score = ‘b’ or CM_Score = ‘b−’:

then score = 1

CM1

If CM_Score = ‘bb+’ or CM_Score = ‘bb’:

then score = 3

If CM_Score = ‘bb−’:

then score = 2

If CM_Score = ‘b+’, ‘b’ or ‘b−’:

then score = 1

Ab_Day1_IPO: :

Abnormal return of the first day after IPO

Netproc_equity: :

Ratio of proceeds from new IPO shares to the RMB book value of assets just prior to IPO

Sentiment: :

Average initial return on all A-share IPOs within 30-day period prior to entity’s own IPO

Hot_Cold: :

Number of IPO within the 30-day period preceding a given entity’s IPO

Car_90: :

Cumulative abnormal return for the 90-day period leading-up to IPO (based on daily value-weighted market returns and reinvestment of cash dividends)

Issuer_Size: :

Logarithm of issuer’s market capitalization (=No. of shares outstanding*final offer price)

D_002: :

Equal to 1 if the issuer lists on the Shenzhen SME market; otherwise 0;

D_300: :

Equal to 1 if the issuer lists on the Shenzhen ChiNext market; otherwise 0;

Prestige: :

Number of IPOs the leading underwriter for the current IPO has conducted since market open divided by the total number of IPOs in the market from inception

D_range: :

Equal to 1 if the issuer has an offer price range; otherwise zero

State: :

Percentage of state owned shares (just prior to IPO)

LegalPerson: :

Percentage of legal person shares (just prior to IPO)

Leverage: :

Long term debt divided by equity (Just prior to IPO)

D_Growth_Ear: :

=1 if listing firm has positive growth in earnings over 3 years prior to IPO, otherwise 0

D_a to D_q: :

industry dummies (17 industry sector dummies but only 14 feature: industry codes j, k, p have no stocks in our sample)

ROA_b1 (or ROE_b1):

Return-on-assets (return-on-equity) for IPO firm for year-end immediately prior to IPO

Appendix 2

See Table 11.

Table 11 Basic statistics for regression variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, C.X., McGuinness, P.B. & Zhang, Q. Credit scores and the performance of newly-listed stocks: an exploration of the Chinese A-share market. Rev Quant Finan Acc 51, 79–111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0664-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0664-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation