Abstract
Contemporary Kant-scholarship has a tendency to allign Kant’s understanding of depravity closer to Erasmus than Luther in their famous debate on the freedom of the will (1520–1527). While, at face value, some paragraphs do warrant such a claim, I will argue that Kant’s understanding of the radical evil will draws closer to Luther than Erasmus in a number of elements. These elements are (1) the intervention of the Wille for progress towards the good, (2) a positive choice for evil, (3) the inscrutability of moral progress, (4) the rejection of prudence as a means for salvation and (5) the rejection of moral sentimentalism. I believe that Kant-scholarship mistakenly pegs Kant’s rational Enlightenment optimism for an existential optimism while Kant’s view of fallen nature draws closer to Lutheran than Erasmusian depravity. A tacit Lutheran influence pervades Kant’s moral philosophy which could explain the influence Kant’s has had on some more pessimistic 19th century philosophers such as Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ameriks, K. (2006). Kant and motivational externalism. In: H. Klemme, et al. (Ed.) Moralische Motivation. Kant und die Alternativen (pp. 3–23). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Anderson-God S. (1984) Kant’s rejection of devilishness: The limits of human volition. Idealisitic Studies 14: 35–48
Allison H. (1990) Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Allison, H. (1996). On the banality of (radical) evil. A kantian analysis. In: H. Allison (Ed.) Idealism and Freedom (pp. 169–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aune B. (1979) Kant’s theory of morals. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Axinn S. (1994) The logic of hope: Extensions of Kant’s view of religion. Rodopi publication, Amsterdam
Bernstein R. (2002) Radical evil. A philosophical interrogation. Routledge Press, New York
De Wachter F. (2003) Hoe radicaal is het radicale kwaad?. Tijdschrift voor de filosofie 65: 33–57
Firestone C., Jacobs N. (2008) In defense of Kant’s religion. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Gonzalez J. (1975) A history of christian thought, vol. III: From the protestant reformation to the twentieth century. Abingdon Press, Nashville
Guyer P. (2000) Kant on freedom, law, and happiness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Henrich, D. (2009). Hutcheson and Kant. In: K. Ameriks, O. Höffe (Eds.) Kant’s moral and legal philosophy (pp. 29–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herdt J. (2008) Putting on virtue The legacy of splendid vices. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Herrera L. (2000) Kant on the moral Triebfeder. Kant-Studien 91: 395–410
Kant I. (1963) Lectures on ethics. (L. Infield, Trans.). Harper and Row, New York
Kant, I. (1996a). Practical philosophy. (M. J. Gregor, Ed. and Trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1996b). Religion and rational theology. (A. Wood & G. Di Giovanni, Ed. and Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerstein, S. (2001). Kant’s (not so radical?) hedonism. In: V. Gerhardt (Ed.) Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongress, vol. III (pp. 247–55). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Korsgaard C. (1996) Creating the kingdom of ends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kraye, J. (1988). Moral philosophy. In: C. Schmitt, & Q. Skinner (Eds.) The cambridge history of renaissance philosophy (pp. 303–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuehn M. (2001) Kant: A biography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Levi A. (1974) Pagan virtue and the humanism of the northern renaissance. The Society for Renaissance Studies, London
Lindberg, C. (2005). Introduction. In: The Pietist theologians (pp. 1–21). Oxford: Blackwell Publication.
Matustik M. (2008) Radical evil and the scarcity of hope. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis
McCarty R. (1993) Kantian moral motivation and the feeling of respect. Journal of the History of Philosophy 31: 421–435
McCarthy R. (2009) Kant’s theory of action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Michalson G. (1990) Fallen freedom. Kant on radical evil and moral regeneration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Michalson G. (1999) Kant and the problem of god. Blackwell publication, Oxford
Moroney, S. (2000). The noetic effects of sin: A historical and contemporary exploration of how sin affects our thinking. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Muchnik, P. (2009). Kant’s theory of evil. An essay on the dangers of self-love and the a prioricity of history. Lanham: Lexington Books.
O’Neill O. (1975) Acting on principle. An essay on Kantian ethics. Columbia University Press, Columbia
Palmquist S. (1992) Does Kant reduce religion to morality. Kant-Studien 83: 129–148
Palmquist, S. (2000). Kant’s critical religion. Volume Two of Kant’s system of perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Patton, H.J. (1964). Foreword. In: The doctrine of virtue. Part II of the Metaphysics of morals. (M. Gregor, Trans.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Reath A. (1989) Kant’s theory of moral sensibility. Respect for the law and the influence of inclination. Kant-Studien 80: 284–302
Rummel E. (1995) The humanist-scholastic debate in the renaissance and reformation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Skinner Q. (1978) The foundations of modern political thought. Vol 1: The renaissance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Staten, H. (2005). Radical evil revived: Hitler, Kant, Luther, Neo-Lacanians. In: A. Schrift (Ed.) Modernity and the problem of evil (pp. 12–27). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Sudduth M. (2009) The reformed objection to natural theology. Farnham, Ashgate Publishing
Wallmann, J. (1990). Der Pietismus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Winter, E. (1972). Introduction. In: Erasmus–Luther. Discourse on Free Will (pp. v–xi). (E. Winter, Ed. and Trans.). New York: Frederick Ungar.
Wood A. (1999) Kant’s ethical thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanden Auweele, D. The lutheran influence on Kant’s depraved will. Int J Philos Relig 73, 117–134 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9331-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9331-4