Abstract
Teacher education institutions conduct information and communications technology (ICT) courses to prepare preservice teachers (or initial teacher education candidates) to support their teaching practice with appropriate ICT tools. ICT course evaluations based on preservice teachers’ perception of course experiences are limited in indicating the kinds of ICT integration knowledge or technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) preservice teachers have gained throughout the course. Preservice teachers’ ICT course experiences was found to influence their intentions to integrate ICT but its influence on their TPACK perceptions, if better understood, can inform teacher education institutions about the design of ICT courses. This study describes the design and validation of an ICT course evaluation instrument that examines preservice teachers’ perceptions of ICT course experiences and TPACK. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed on survey results collected from a graduating cohort of 869 Singapore preservice teachers who had undergone a compulsory ICT course during their teacher training program. These preservice teachers were being prepared to teach the different subject areas at primary, secondary, and junior colleges (or postsecondary institutions for 17–19 year olds) in Singapore. The regression model showed that preservice teachers’ perceived TPACK was first influenced by their perceptions of course experiences that supported the development of intermediary TPACK knowledge components such as technological knowledge and technological pedagogical knowledge. The methodological implications for the design of ICT course evaluation surveys and the practical applications of survey results to the refinement of ICT course curriculum are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, N., Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Wayne, A., & Zucker, A. (2002). The integrative studies of educational technologies: Professional development and teachers’ use of technology. Arlington, VA: SRI International.
Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers in Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.
Archambault, L. M., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States, vol. 9. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article2.cfm
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Donovan, M. S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expandedth ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. W. (2009). Strategies for preparing preservice social studies teachers to integrate technology effectively: Models and practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 46–59.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology and Society, 13(4), 63–73.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2011a). Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 595–603.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. W. L. (2011b). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers in Education, 57(1), 1184–1193. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007.
Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using and elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analye and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60–69.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
Divaharan, S., Lim, W. Y., & Tan, S. C. (2011). Walk the talk: Immersing preservice teachers in the learning of ICT tools for knowledge creation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1304–1318.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714–730.
Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K., Pellegrino, J. W., & Plants, R. (2006). Technology for testing and learning with understanding. In J. M. Copper (Ed.), Classroom teaching skills (8th ed., pp. 185–234). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Graham, R. C., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. Tech Trends, 53(5), 70–79.
Hair, J. F., Jr. , Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers in Education, 49(3), 740–762.
Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-Developing Instructional Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technology pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 563–573.
Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38, 1–21.
Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.
Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413–430.
Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three-year study (U.S. Department of Education Report No. 2000–04). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Schmidt, D. A., Sahin, E. B., Thompson, A., & Seymour, J. (2008). Developing effective technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in PreK-6 teachers. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2008 Chesapeake, VA.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004.
Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
Starkey, L. (2010). Teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 16(2), 233–244.
Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.
Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Choy, D. (2009a). Modelling pre-service teachers’ perceived usefulness of an ICT-based student-centred learning (SCL) curriculum: A Singapore study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(4), 535–545.
Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009b). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers in Education, 53(3), 1000–1009.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.
Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koh, J.H.L., Woo, HL. & Lim, WY. Understanding the relationship between Singapore preservice teachers’ ICT course experiences and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through ICT course evaluation. Educ Asse Eval Acc 25, 321–339 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9165-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9165-y