Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Elusive Relationship Between Teacher Characteristics and Student Academic Growth: A Longitudinal Multilevel Model for Change

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teacher characteristics and student achievement growth are currently a significant topic of investigation in the educational accountability arena. Given the environment of high-stakes accountability associated with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation and state accountability systems, staffing all classrooms with highly qualified teachers is a critical national concern. A new era of research is needed to understand the complexity of teacher quality when defined by student learning growth. The present study evaluated the effects of teacher characteristics (i.e., experience, education, and race) in high school reading achievement gains using a multi-level growth model in an urban school district in Kentucky. Findings showed significant effects of time, but non-significant effects of teacher characteristics in high school reading achievement growth. Implications for educational policy and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, C. L. (1992). An introduction to hierarchical linear models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 58–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. Elementary School Journal, 89(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Economic Development (1994). Putting learning first: Governing and managing the schools for high achievement. New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved October 29, 2007 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “high qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us. Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSander, M. K. (2000). Teacher evaluation and merit pay: Legal considerations, practical concerns. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, D. M., Bryant, D. M., Pianta, R. C., Clifford, R. M., Burchinal, M. R., Ritchie, S., et al. (2006). Are teachers’ education, major, and credentials related to classroom quality and children’s academic gains in pre-kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 174–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early, D. M., Maxwell, K. L., Burchinal, M., Bender, R. H., Ebanks, C., Henry, G. T., et al. (2007). Teachers’ education, classroom quality, and young children’s academic skills: Results from seven studies of preschool programs. Child Development, 78(2), 558–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Sciences Reform Act (2002). P. L. No. 107–279.

  • Eisenhart, M., & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on “scientifically based” education research. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N. (1997). Teacher salaries and teacher quality. Economics Letters, 55, 267–271 (August).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N. (2002). Can public schools buy better-qualified teachers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(4), 686–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2001). Evaluation the evidence on teacher certification: A rejoinder. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1997). Looking in classrooms (7th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guin, K. (2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42). Retrieved October 29, 2007 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n42/, August 16.

  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P., Stroot, S., Yinger, R., & Smith, S. (2005). Meeting the teacher education accountability challenge: A focus on novice and experienced teacher studies. Mount Vernon, OH: Teacher Quality Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters…a lot. Thinking K-16, 3(2), 3–14 Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, H. R., Mendro, R. L., & Weerasinghe, D. (1997). Teacher effects on longitudinal student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, Indianapolis, IN, July.

  • Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2001). Enhancing teacher and teaching quality: Recommendations for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 85(628), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, V. (2002). Evaluating the effect of teacher performance incentives on students’ achievement. Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1286–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, R. H. (1996). Value-added indicators of school performance. In E.A. Hanushek, & D. W. Jorgenson (Eds.) Improving America’s schools: The role of incentives (pp. 197–223). Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, R. H. (2000). Value-added indicators: A powerful tool for evaluating science and mathematics programs and policies. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, J. (1997). Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman Jr., A. M., Mohrman, S. A., & Odden, A. R. (1996). Aligning teacher compensation with systematic school reform: Skill-based pay and group-based performance rewards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(1), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act. (2001) Pub. L. No. 107–110.

  • Raudenbush, S. W. (1997). Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2001). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Amherst, MA: Amherst College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodosky, R., & Muñoz, M. A. (2002). Value-added approaches to the evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, Boise, Idaho.

  • Sanders, W. L. (2000). Value-added assessment from student achievement data: Opportunities and hurdles. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1994). The Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(3), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center. Retrieved October, 29, 2007 from http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ensure/tva/tva_2.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (2001). EVAAS reports for educational assessment: Jefferson County Public Schools. Cary, NC: SAS in School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H. (2006). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: Improving the educational landscape. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.).Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 1–232nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2000). Teacher evaluation and student achievement. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2004). Handbook for qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThinkLink. (2007). Research. Retrieved March 27, 2007 from http://www.thinklinklearning.com/research.php.

  • Tucker, P., & Stronger, J. (2005). Linking teacher evaluation and student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., & Kegan, R. (2006). Change leadership: A practical guide to transforming our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, A. (2002). Teacher inequality: New evidence on disparities in teachers’ academic skills. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(30). Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n30/.

  • Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Educational Research, 73, 89–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. J., Mendro, R. L., Orsak, T. H., & Weerasinghe, D. (1998). An application of hierarchical lineal modeling to the estimation of school and teacher effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California. ERIC Document reproduction service No. ED 424300, April.

  • Weerasinghe, D., Anderson, M., & Bembry, K. (2001). Precision of measures of central tendency: Computing an effectiveness index for teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington, April.

  • Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Scientifically based research on teacher quality: Research on teacher preparation and professional development. Presented to White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers, March 5, 2002. Published as Appendix C of Improving Teacher Quality State Grants. Title II, Part A. Non-Regulatory Draft Guidance. Washington. DC: U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved October 29, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SIP/TitleIIguidance2002.doc.

  • Willet, J. B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In E. Z. Rothkopt (Ed.) Review of Research in Education 1988–89, 15 (pp. 345–422). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Accountability, Research, and Planning Department, VanHoose Education Center, Jefferson County Public Schools, 3332 Newburg Road, Louisville, KY, 40218, USA

    Marco A. Muñoz & Florence C. Chang

Authors
  1. Marco A. Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florence C. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco A. Muñoz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muñoz, M.A., Chang, F.C. The Elusive Relationship Between Teacher Characteristics and Student Academic Growth: A Longitudinal Multilevel Model for Change. J Pers Eval Educ 20, 147–164 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9054-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9054-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation