Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Adolescent Friendship Group Integration and Cohesion in Weapon-Related Violent Crime as a Young Adult

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weapon-related violent crime is a serious, complex, and multifaceted public health problem. The present study uses data from Waves I and III of Add Health (n = 10,482, 54% female) to examine how friendship group integration and cohesion in adolescence (ages 12–19) is associated with weapon-related criminal activity as a young adult (ages 18–26). Results indicate that greater cohesion in friendship groups is associated with significantly lower weapon-related criminal activity in young adulthood. In addition, for adolescent girls, a greater number of close friendship ties—an indicator of friendship group integration—is associated with less weapon-related criminal activity in young adulthood. These findings suggest that school-based initiatives to facilitate inclusive and cohesive adolescent peer communities may be an effective strategy to curb weapon-related criminal activity in young adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, F. C., Marsh, P., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76(3), 747–760. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00875.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2000). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. R., & McDonald, K. L. (2009). The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. In K. H. Rubin, W. R. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baerveldt, C., Van Rossem, R., Vermande, M., & Weerman, F. (2004). Students’ delinquency and correlates with strong and weaker ties: A study of students’ networks in Dutch high schools. Connections, 26(1), 11–28. doi: hdl.handle.net/11370/b50b7869-fffe-4bab-9216-849be0b9c808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S. L., Flewelling, R. L., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1997). Characteristics of students who bring weapons to school. Journal of Adolescent Health, 20(4), 261–270. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00283-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas, J., & Egan, V. (2006). Weapons carrying in British teenagers: The role of personality, delinquency, sensational interests, and mating effort. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 17(1), 53–72. doi:10.1080/14789940500407692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda, B. B., & Tollett, C. L. (1999). A study of recidivism of serious and persistent offenders among adolescents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(2), 111–126. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00051-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Waring, E. J., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s operation ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(3), 195–225. doi:10.1177/0022427801038003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, I. R., & Moore, S. C. (2009). Weapons and violence: A review of theory and research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 215–225. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. 1st ed. New York, NY: Little Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistics in Medicine, 32(4), 556–577. doi:10.1002/sim.5408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cobbina, J. E., Like-Haislip, T. Z., & Miller, J. (2010). Gang fights versus cat fights: Urban young men’s gendered narratives of violence. Deviant Behavior, 31(7), 596–624. doi:10.1080/01639620903231522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11(4), 527–559. doi:10.1080/07418829400092421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Gest, S. D., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Testing three explanations of the emergence of weapon carrying in peer context: The roles of aggression, victimization, and the social network. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(4), 371–376. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N. A., et al. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The Roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48(1), 187–220. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00183.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, R. H., Cadenhead, C., Pendergrast, R. A., Slavens, G., & Linder, C. W. (1994). Factors associated with the use of violence among urban black adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 84(4), 612–617. doi:10.2105/AJPH.84.4.612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, R. H., Getts, A. G., Cadenhead, C., & Woods, E. R. (1995). The association between weapon carrying and the use of violence among adolescents living in and around public housing. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17(6), 376–380. doi:10.1016/1054-139X(95)00030-V.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. (1966). Suicide: A study in sociology. London: Routledge & K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, W. E., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children’s deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78(4), 1240–1254. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01063.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Foshee, V. A., Cai, L., & DuRant, R. H. (2006). The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(2), 159–186. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00127.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., Faris, R., Hipp, J., Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., & Cai, L. (2008). Peer smoking, other peer attributes, and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. Prevention Science, 9(2), 88–98. doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0087-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esselmont, C. (2014). Carrying a weapon to school: The roles of bullying victimization and perceived safety. Deviant Behavior, 35(3), 215–232. doi:10.1080/01639625.2013.834767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falci, C., & McNeely, C. (2009). Too many friends: Social integration, network cohesion and adolescent depressive symptoms. Social Forces, 87(4), 2031–2061. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faris, R., & Ennett, S. (2012). Adolescent aggression: The role of peer group status motives, peer aggression, and group characteristics. Social Networks, 34(4), 371–378. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African-American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 9, 992–1004. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, M. S. (2006). Youth gang social dynamics and social network analysis: Applying degree centrality measures to assess the nature of gang boundaries. In J. F. Short, & L. A. Hughes (Eds.), Studying youth gangs (pp. 607–622). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. E., Young, A., & Boyd, C. (2008). Relational aggression at school: Associations with school safety and social climate. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 641–654. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9192-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D. J. (2009). Violence, older peers, and the socialization of adolescent boys in disadvantaged neighborhoods. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 445–464. doi:10.1177/000312240907400306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., Florey, F., Tabor, J. W., Bearman, P. S., Jones, J., & Richard Udry, J. (2003). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.

  • Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 1013–1057. doi:10.1086/320298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 99–134. doi:10.1023/A:1015227414929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L., Doogan, N. J., & Soller, B. (2014). Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology, 52(4), 688–722. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, C. C., Brookmeyer, K. A., & Shahar, G. (2005). Weapon violence in adolescence: Parent and school connectedness as protective factors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(4), 306–312. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.03.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, L. A. (2013). Group cohesiveness, gang member prestige, and delinquency and violence in Chicago, 1959-1962. Criminology, 51(4), 795–832. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalsbeek, W. D., Morris, C. B., & Vaughan, B. J. (2001). Effects of nonresponse on the mean squared error of estimates from a longitudinal study. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, D. A. (2004). Strangers in the halls: Isolation and delinquency in school networks. Social Forces, 83(1), 351–390. doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C. (2013). Gender and crime. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 291–308. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakon, C. M., & Valente, T. W. (2012). Social integration in friendship networks: The synergy of network structure and peer influence in relation to cigarette smoking among high risk adolescents. Social Science and Medicine, 74(9), 1407–1417. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R., Powell, K. E., Kann, L., Collins, J. L., & Kolbe, L. J. (1998). Weapon-carrying, physical fighting, and fight-related injury among US adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(2), 122–129. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(97)00020-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luster, T., & Oh, S. M. (2001). Correlates of male adolescents carrying handguns among their peers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 714–726. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00714.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 49–74. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00550.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R. (2012). The Cost of Firearm Violence. http://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/publications/cost-firearm-violence. Accessed 17 Aug 2016.

  • Mitchell, K. J., Hamby, S. L., Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A., & Jones, L. M. (2015). Weapon involvement in the victimization of children. Pediatrics, 136(1), 10–17. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-3966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J., Brynildsen, W. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Gest, S. (2011). Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks, 33(2), 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. P., McGrady, G. A., Marrow, C., & Mueller, C. W. (1997). Weapon carrying among black adolescents: A social network perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 87(6), 1038–1040. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.6.1038.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pabayo, R., Molnar, B. E., & Kawachi, I. (2014). The role of neighborhood income inequality in adolescent aggression and violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(4), 571–579. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos, A. V., Hureau, D. M., & Braga, A. A. (2013). The corner and the crew: The influence of geography and social networks on gang violence. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 417–447. doi:10.1177/0003122413486800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. C., & Cornwell, B. (2007). Reconsidering peer influences on delinquency: Do less proximate contacts matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(2), 127–149. doi:10.1007/s10940-006-9022-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent girls’ externalizaing and health risk behaviors: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 103–122. doi:10.1037/0022.006X.72.1.103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, N., & Thomas, C. (2004). Recent research findings on aggressive and violent behavior in youth: Implications for clinical assessment and intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(4), 260–277. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. G., Justice Policy Center, & United States Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2012). Social networks, delinquency, and gang membership using a neighborhood framework to examine the influence of network composition and structure in a Latino community (pp. 1 online resource (viii, 190, [180])). http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/412519-Social-Networks-Delinquency-and-Gang-Membership.pdf.

  • Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P. T. (2006). Navigating dangerous streets: The sources and consequences of street efficacy. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 826–846. doi:10.1177/000312240607100506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheley, J. F., McGee, Z. T., & Wright, J. D. (1992). Gun-related violence in and around inner-city schools. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 146(6), 677–682. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160180035012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A., & Moody, J. (2013). Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: Nodes missing at random. Social Networks, 35(4), 652–668. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, K. J., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2003). Episodic and persistent gun-carrying among urban African-American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32(5), 356–364. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00022-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2010). Race, code of the street, and violent delinquency: A multilevel investigation of neighborhood street culture and individual norms of violence. Criminology, 48(2), 569–605. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00196.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T., & Krohn, M. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Criminal Justice, 4(1), 33–83. doi: 10.1.1.207.3032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurnherr, J., Michaud, P. A., Berchtold, A., Akre, C., & Suris, J. C. (2009). Youths carrying a weapon or using a weapon in a fight: What makes the difference? Health Education Research, 24(2), 270–279. doi:10.1093/her/cyn017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, M., Braga, A. A., & Papachristos, A. V. (2016). The transmission of gun and other weapon-involved violence within social networks. Epidemiologic Reviews, 38(1), 70–86. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxv009.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, J. L., & Langton, L. (2015). Criminal victimization, 2014. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69–89. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valois, R. F., McKeown, R. E., Garrison, C. Z., & Vincent, M. L. (1995). Correlates of aggressive and violent behaviors among public high school adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 16(1), 26–34. doi:10.1016/1054-139X(95)94070-O.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. F., & Halverson, C. F. (1975). Intensive and extensive peer behavior - longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses. Child Development, 46(1), 19–26. doi:10.2307/1128829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. W., Gainer, P. S., & Champion, H. R. (1993). Weapon carrying among inner-city junior high school students: Defensive behavior vs aggressive delinquency. American Journal of Public Health, 83(11), 1604–1608. doi:10.2105/AJPH.83.11.1604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. S., Mulhall, P. F., Reis, J. S., & DeVille, J. O. (2002). Adolescents carrying handguns and taking them to school: Psychosocial correlates among public school students in Illinois. Journal of Adolescence, 25(5), 551–567. doi:10.1006/jado.2002.0499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. (2004). The interface of school climate and school connectedness and relationships with aggression and victimization. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 293–299. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08286.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1999). Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: Social causation, social selection, or both? Criminology, 37(3), 479–514. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00494.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. T., & Rees, C. (2013). Social networks and delinquency in adolescence: Implications for life-course criminology. In: Gibson, C. L. & Krohn, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of life-course criminology (pp. 159–180). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. T. (2014). “Role magnets”? An empirical investigation of popularity trajectories for life-course persistent individuals during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 104–115. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9946-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

Author's Contributions

M.P.M. conceived and designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript; O.P.A. participated in the design and interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; M.T.F. participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; L.I.Z. participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Dr. Mundt received support from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), grant K01AA018410, for the design and conduct of this study. The findings and conclusions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of their respective institutions, NIAAA, or any other agency of the FederalGovernment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlon P. Mundt.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Add Health study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.

Informed Consent

Add Health participants provided written informed consent for participation in all aspects of Add Health in accordance with the University of North Carolina School of Public Health Institutional Review Board guidelines that are based on the Code of Federal Regulations on the Protection of Human Subjects 45CFR46.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 35

Table 3 Analysis variables from the Add Health survey, waves I and III
Table 4 Bivariate correlation matrix
Table 5 Multi-level logit regression coefficients estimating effects of group integration and cohesion measures on weapon-related violence in the gender-specific sub-samples

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mundt, M.P., Antonaccio, O.P., French, M.T. et al. The Role of Adolescent Friendship Group Integration and Cohesion in Weapon-Related Violent Crime as a Young Adult. J Youth Adolescence 46, 1643–1660 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0631-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0631-6

Keywords

Navigation