Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants of Partner Opportunism in Strategic Alliances: A Conceptual Framework

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We present a comprehensive framework of the key determinants of partner opportunism in strategic alliances.

Design/methodology/approach

We propose an extended definition of partner opportunism and three categories of the determinants of partner opportunism based on a review of the literature. These categories comprise economic factors (equity involvement, asymmetric alliance-specific investments, mutual hostages, and payoff inequity), relational factors (cultural diversity and goal incompatibilities), and temporal factors (alliance horizon and pressures for quick results).

Findings

The framework of determinants makes clear how the various determinants of partner opportunism may be differentially salient in the three major alliance types, namely, equity joint ventures, minority equity alliances, and nonequity alliances.

Implications

Based on the framework, a number of propositions are developed to facilitate empirical research on partner opportunism. Managerial implications flowing from the proposed framework are also discussed.

Originality/value

Although scholars in various disciplines have studied the general topic of opportunistic behavior, our understanding of partner opportunism in strategic alliances appears to be fragmented and inadequate. As partner opportunism is acknowledged as a significant threat to alliance survival and success, a comprehensive framework of the key determinants of such opportunism should improve our understanding of this phenomenon and to also provide an impetus for future research. The article also responds to the need of alliance managers for a framework of key factors that are responsible for partner opportunism so that they may be able to deploy appropriate deterrence mechanisms to minimize opportunistic behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8, 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1997). What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 845–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, P. W., & Banks, J. C. (1987). Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleeke, J., & Ernst, D. (1991). The way to win cross-border alliances. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 127–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, L. L. (1991). Partner contributions as predictors of equity share in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Wilkinson, T. J. (1995). Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning, 28(3), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Dev, C. S., & Lee, D.-J. (2000). Managing marketing channel opportunism: The efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. T., Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1989). Japanese joint ventures with western multinationals: Synthesising the economic and cultural explanations of failure. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 6, 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1988). A theory of cooperation in international business. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 31–53). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Wire. (2000). Bidland Systems sues Telefonica for breach of contract; Multimillion dollar lawsuit filed against telecommunications giant. http://nrstg2s.djnr.com/cgi-bin/DJInter… Retrieved 12 Dec 2000.

  • Crookell, H., & Beamish, P. (2006). Cameron Auto Parts (B)—Revised (Case # 906M16). ON, Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario.

  • Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. J., & Sakano, T. (1995). Japanese and local partner commitment to IJVs: Psychological consequences of outcomes and investments in the IJV relationship. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K. (2004). Time-span and risk of partner opportunism in strategic alliances. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 744–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K. (2005). Deceitful behaviors of alliance partners: Potential and prevention. Management Decision, 43, 706–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K. (2006). Strategic alliance temporalities and partner opportunism. British Journal of Management, 17, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & He, I. Y. (2006). Entrepreneurial firms in search of established partners: Review and recommendations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12, 114–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Kumar, R. (2007). Learning dynamics in the alliance development process. Management Decision, 45, 684–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Kumar, R. (2009a). Interpartner harmony in strategic alliances: Managing commitment and forbearance. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances, 1, 24–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Kumar, R. (2009b). Interpartner sensemaking in strategic alliances: Managing cultural differences and internal tensions. Management Decision, 47.

  • Das, T. K., & Kumar, R. (2009c). Interpretive schemes in cross-national alliances: Managing conflicts and discrepancies. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Das, T. K., & Kumar, R. (2009d). Regulatory focus and opportunism in the alliance development process. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Das, T. K., & Rahman, N. (2001). Partner misbehavior in strategic alliances: Guidelines for effective deterrence. Journal of General Management, 27(1), 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Rahman, N. (2002). Opportunism dynamics in strategic alliances. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies and alliances (pp. 89–118). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1996). Risk types and inter-firm alliance structures. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1999). Managing risks in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Executive, 13(4), 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2001). Relational risk and its personal correlates in strategic alliances. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2002a). The dynamics of alliance conditions in the alliance development process. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 725–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2002b). Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 85–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, D. L., & Hill, C. W. L. (1999). An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 601–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(Summer Special Issue), 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., Olk, P. M., & Ring, P. S. (2000). Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 239–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1992). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassenheimer, J. B., Baucus, D. B., & Baucus, M. S. (1996). Cooperative arrangements among entrepreneurs: An analysis of opportunism and communication in franchise structures. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1999). Performance relationships in UK international alliances. Management International Review, 39, 123–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, L. J., Ebers, R., & Clinchy, R. M. (1999). The systems psychodynamics of a joint venture: Anxiety, social defenses, and the management of mutual dependence. Human Relations, 52, 697–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesinger, D. W. (1990). The human side of economic organization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 478–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implication of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer Special Issue), 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1988). Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 205–226). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & Miner, A. S. (1992). The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact and buyer-seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helper, S., & Levine, D. I. (1992). Long-term supplier relations and product-market structure. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 8, 561–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L. (1990). Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 500–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. C., & Hellriegel, D. (1994). Critical contingencies in joint venture management: Some lessons from managers. Organization Science, 5, 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1997). The many faces of multi-firm alliances: Lessons for managers. California Management Review, 39(3), 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, G. (1984). An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 278–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., Cullen, J. B., & Sakano, T. (1996). Opportunistic tendencies in IJVs with the Japanese: The effects of culture, shared decision making, and relationship age. International Executive, 38(1), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. W., & Stump, R. L. (1999). Determinants of commitment and opportunism: Integrating and extending insights from transaction cost analysis and relational exchange theory. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16, 334–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1994). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killing, J. P. (1982). How to make global joint venture work: Learning to live with two parents is harder than managers think. Harvard Business Review, 60(3), 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. (1996). Why hold-ups occur: The self-enforcing range of contractual relationships. Economic Inquiry, 34, 444–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., & Das, T. K. (2007). Interpartner legitimacy in the alliance development process. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1425–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., & Das, T. K. (2009). Strategic alliances and culture in a globalizing world. In J. Ulijn, G. Duysters, & E. Meijer (Eds.), Strategic alliances, mergers and acquisitions: The influence of culture on successful cooperation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.-J. (1998). Developing international strategic alliances between exporters and importers: The case of Australian exporters. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P., & Roos, J. (1993). Strategic alliances: Formation, implementation and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2007a). Are joint ventures more opportunistic in a more volatile environment? Strategic Management Journal, 28, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2007b). An integrated anti-opportunism system in international exchange. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 855–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, S. E. (1988). Equity, opportunism, and the design of contractual relations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 144, 180–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschi, P.-X., & Roger, A. (1994). Cultural context and social effectiveness in international joint ventures. Management International Review, 34, 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17, 985–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Skinner, S. J. (1989). Interorganizational dependence and control as predictors of opportunism in dealer-supplier relations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rarick, C. A. (2004). Red Dragon Enterprises: A failing Chinese joint venture (Case # 304-462-1). Miami, FL: Barry University.

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. T., Jr., Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1997). Performance in principal-agent dyads: The causes and consequences of perceived asymmetry of commitment to the relationship. Management Science, 43, 680–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M., & Helper, S. (1998). Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34, 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C., & De Meyer, A. (1991). Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. G. (1980). A theory of self-enforcing agreements. Journal of Business, 53(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review, 73, 519–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1993). Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, City University of New York, One Bernard Baruch Way, Box B9-240, New York, NY, 10010, USA

    T. K. Das

  2. Management and Management Science Department, Lubin School of Business, Pace University, One Pace Plaza, W-414, New York, NY, 10038, USA

    Noushi Rahman

Authors
  1. T. K. Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noushi Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. K. Das.

Additional information

Received and reviewed by former editor, George Neuman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, T.K., Rahman, N. Determinants of Partner Opportunism in Strategic Alliances: A Conceptual Framework. J Bus Psychol 25, 55–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9132-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9132-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation