Abstract
This article reports research into undergraduate design learning through an off-campus partnership. The Sorrell Foundation’s Joinedupdesign for Academies programme involved partnerships between university design departments, ‘failing’ 11–18 schools and professional designers, in the context of a funding commitment to rebuild/renew school buildings in the UK, and an ideological commitment to remodel schools as ‘Academies’. We investigated the impact on 12 undergraduate Design students’ learning as they partnered pupils at two secondary schools in a live regeneration project, following both schools’ redesign/relaunch as ‘Academies’. Using a mixed methods case study approach, we report the acquisition of a wide range of employability skills, vital for professional designers, through an innovative learning model in which pupils act as clients. In terms of design education, these partnerships provided a rare and authentic exposure to the complex demands of publicly-funded work for undergraduate design students, and as such offer a new and potentially interesting model for experiential design education, which bridges campus and off-campus learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexiou, K., Johnson, J., & Zamenopoulos, T. (2009). Embracing complexity in design. London: Routledge.
Bassey, M. (1995). Creating education through research. Edinburgh: BERA.
Butcher, J. (2009). Off-campus learning and employability in undergraduate design: The Sorrell Young Design Project as an innovative partnership. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7(3), 171–184.
Cox, G. (2005). Cox review of creativity in business: Building on the UK’s strengths. London: HMT.
Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Working together: Giving children and young people a say. London: DfES.
HEFCE. (2001). Strategies for widening participation in higher education: A guide to good practice. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2001/01_36/01_36.pdf. Accessed Jan 30, 2012.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health, 16(1), 103–121.
Lee, N. (2009). Project methods as the vehicle for learning in undergraduate design education: A typology. Design Studies, 30(5), 541–560.
Leitch, S. (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy—world class skills. The Leitch Review, London: HMSO.
Rudd, P., Marshall, H., & Marson-Smith, H. (2008). Pilot evaluation of the young design programme 2005–2008. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research Publications.
Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble: Designing in a complex world. Boston MA: MIT Press.
The Sorrell Foundation. (2005). Joinedupdesignforschools. London: Merrell.
The Sorrell Foundation. (2008). The pupils’ brief. London: The Sorrell Foundation.
Todd, C. M., Ebasta, A. T., & Hughes, R. (1998). Making university and community collaborations work. In R. M. Lerner & L. A. K. Simon (Eds.), University-community collaborations for the twenty-first century: Outreach scholarship for youth and families (pp. 231–254). New York: Garland.
Viljoen, A., & Hoskyns, T. (2007). For real: A review of the extent of ‘live practice’ within 3D design education in the UK and its potential contribution to curriculum development within the ADM subject area. Brighton: University of Brighton.
Wilson, V. (1997). Focus groups: A useful qualitative method for educational research? British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 209–224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butcher, J., Schaber, F. Undergraduate design learning in multiple partnerships: joinedupdesign for academies. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 567–579 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9204-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9204-x