Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Undergraduate design learning in multiple partnerships: joinedupdesign for academies

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports research into undergraduate design learning through an off-campus partnership. The Sorrell Foundation’s Joinedupdesign for Academies programme involved partnerships between university design departments, ‘failing’ 11–18 schools and professional designers, in the context of a funding commitment to rebuild/renew school buildings in the UK, and an ideological commitment to remodel schools as ‘Academies’. We investigated the impact on 12 undergraduate Design students’ learning as they partnered pupils at two secondary schools in a live regeneration project, following both schools’ redesign/relaunch as ‘Academies’. Using a mixed methods case study approach, we report the acquisition of a wide range of employability skills, vital for professional designers, through an innovative learning model in which pupils act as clients. In terms of design education, these partnerships provided a rare and authentic exposure to the complex demands of publicly-funded work for undergraduate design students, and as such offer a new and potentially interesting model for experiential design education, which bridges campus and off-campus learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexiou, K., Johnson, J., & Zamenopoulos, T. (2009). Embracing complexity in design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassey, M. (1995). Creating education through research. Edinburgh: BERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. (2009). Off-campus learning and employability in undergraduate design: The Sorrell Young Design Project as an innovative partnership. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. (2005). Cox review of creativity in business: Building on the UK’s strengths. London: HMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Working together: Giving children and young people a say. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE. (2001). Strategies for widening participation in higher education: A guide to good practice. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2001/01_36/01_36.pdf. Accessed Jan 30, 2012.

  • Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health, 16(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2009). Project methods as the vehicle for learning in undergraduate design education: A typology. Design Studies, 30(5), 541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, S. (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy—world class skills. The Leitch Review, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, P., Marshall, H., & Marson-Smith, H. (2008). Pilot evaluation of the young design programme 2005–2008. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble: Designing in a complex world. Boston MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sorrell Foundation. (2005). Joinedupdesignforschools. London: Merrell.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sorrell Foundation. (2008). The pupils’ brief. London: The Sorrell Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, C. M., Ebasta, A. T., & Hughes, R. (1998). Making university and community collaborations work. In R. M. Lerner & L. A. K. Simon (Eds.), University-community collaborations for the twenty-first century: Outreach scholarship for youth and families (pp. 231–254). New York: Garland.

  • Viljoen, A., & Hoskyns, T. (2007). For real: A review of the extent of ‘live practice’ within 3D design education in the UK and its potential contribution to curriculum development within the ADM subject area. Brighton: University of Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, V. (1997). Focus groups: A useful qualitative method for educational research? British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Butcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butcher, J., Schaber, F. Undergraduate design learning in multiple partnerships: joinedupdesign for academies. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 567–579 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9204-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9204-x

Keywords

Navigation