Abstract
This paper examines the philosophical debate on Seng Zhao (僧肇 384–414)’s Thesis on No-Motion of Things (Wu buqian lun 物不遷論, hereafter WBQL), a debate which took place approximately at the turn of the late sixteenth and the early seventeenth centuries. Without doubt the Zhao Treatise (Zhao lun 肇論) is the most precious gem in the early Chinese Madhyamaka legacy. The sterling reputation of this seminal treatise had never been challenged until Zhencheng (鎮澄 1546–1617) published the Logical Investigation of the Thesis of No-Motion of Things (Wu buqian zhengliang lun 物不遷正量論, hereafter WBQZLL) during 1588–1589. The following focuses on Zhencheng’s WBQZLL to see how he applied hetu-vidyā in his hermeneutical project. How did Zhencheng employ the syllogism in his critique of the Zhao Treatise? Is his critique justifiable? How is the role of syllogism employed as a hermeneutic tool to understand classical Buddhist texts? In highlighting the innovative features in the application of hetu-vidyā in the late Ming Chinese Buddhist scholasticism as showcased in Zhencheng’s WBQZLL, The controversies swirling around Zhencheng’s challenge to traditional doctrinal authority reveal the distinctive contrast between two forms of Buddhist hermeneutics in the late Ming Buddhist scholasticism: experiential hermeneutics and analytical hermeneutics. While the former has long been practiced in the mainstream of Chinese Buddhism (especially Chan), the latter has received little attention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Primary Sources: Sanskrit Sources
Nyāyapraveśa (NP), in Tachikawa 1971: 140–144.
Tachikawa, Musashi. (1971). A sixth-century manual of Indian logic. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 1(2), 111–145.
Primary Sources: Chinese Sources
T Taishō Shinshū daizōkyō 大正新修大蔵経 (Buddhist Canon Newly Compiled in the Taishō Era). 85 vols.
1924–1934 Takakuso, Junjirō 高楠順次郎, and Watanabe, Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭 (Ed.). Tokio: Issaikyō Kankō Kai.
Z Dainippon zokuzōkyō 大日本續藏經 (Great Japanese Edition of the Buddhist Canon, Continued). 150 vols.
1905–1912 Maeda, Eun 前田慧雲, and Nakano, Tatsue 中野達慧. Kyoto: Zōkyō shoin.
Abhidharma-vibhāṣā-śāstra. Apitan piposha lun 阿毘曇毘婆沙論. Tr. Buddhavarman and Daotai. T28, no. 1546.
Chengguan 澄觀, Dafanguang fo huayanjing shu 大方廣佛華嚴經疏 (Commentary on the Avataṃsaka Sûtra). T35, no. 1735.
Hanshan Deqing 憨山德清, Hanshan laoren mengyou ji 憨山老人夢遊集 (The Elder Hanshan’s Essays in Dream Wandering). Z: 2.32.
Hanshan Deqing, Zhaolun luezhu 肇論略註 (A Concise Commentary on Zhao Treatise). Z: 2.1.
Tongyun 通雲 and Tongmeng 通門, eds., Miyun yuanwu chanshi taiantong zhishuo 密雲圓悟禪師天童直說. The Library of the Institute of Advanced Studies on Asia, University of Tokyo.
Śaṅkarasvâmin, Yinming ruzhengli lun 因明入正理論 (Nyāyapraveúa), tr. Xuanzang 玄奘. T32, no. 1630
Seng Zhao 僧肇, Wu buqian lun 物不遷論 (WBQL), in Zhao lun 肇論, T45, no. 1588.
Zhencheng 鎮澄, Wu buqian zhengliang lun 物不遷正量論 (WBQZLL). Z: 2.2.
Secondary Sources
Jiang, C. 江燦騰. (2006). Wanming fojiao gaigeshi 晚明佛教改革史 (A history of Buddhist reform in the Late Ming). Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue chuban she.
Liebenthal, W. (1968). Chao Lun: The treaties of Seng-chao. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Robinson, R. H. (1978). Early Mādhyamika in India and China. New York: Samuel Weiser (Reprint).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, Ck. Logic, Scripture, and Hermeneutics in Zhencheng’s Critique of the Thesis of No-motion. J Indian Philos 47, 811–829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-018-9358-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-018-9358-2