Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethnoprimatology without Conservation: The Political Ecology of Farmer–Green Monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus) Relations in St. Kitts, West Indies

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The driving force behind the mixed-methods ethnoprimatological endeavor is to effectively conserve nonhuman primates. In this article, I argue that ethnoprimatological research can meet this goal only by discarding the purely science views of conservation that dominate the current literature. By considering more than local ecological perceptions, their ideological agendas, and their levels of power via a political ecology framework, ethnoprimatologists can simultaneously socialize the ecosystems we study and contribute our ethological skills to advance traditionally humanist disciplines’ increased attention to a wider field of agents and structures that matter. I support these arguments through an examination of farmer–green monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus) relations in St. Kitts. Kittitian farmers’ narrative revealed three scales that collectively construct what is locally known as “the monkey problem:” increased rates of local contact between farmers and monkeys on farms, contestations over the future of St. Kitts’ land, and global debates over appropriate strategies to manage the monkey population. I show that although “the monkey problem” in St. Kitts does not involve an endangered or threatened species, my analysis of this construct has implications for primate populations that are threatened. This is because the root cause of this “problem”—the globalized discourse of nature conservation overpowering and problematizing local views about people–animal interactions—characterizes so many of the locales home to primates of conservation concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 5, 147–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akama, J. S., Lant, C. L., & Burnett, G. W. (1996). A political ecology approach to wildlife conservation in Kenya. Environmental Values, 5, 335–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcayna-Stevens, L. (2014). Ethnoprimatology of humanbonobo gestural communication and conservation practices in post-war Democratic Republic of Congo. Society Biology & Human Affairs, 78, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. N. (2011). Ethnobiology: Overview of a growing field. In E. N. Anderson, D. Pearsall, E. Hunn, & N. Turner (Eds.), Ethnobiology (pp. 1–14). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua, M. (2014). Bio-geo-graphy: Landscape, dwelling, and the political ecology of humanelephant relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 915–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, T. J., & Zueli, K. B. (2000). Environmental discourses and the Ivorian savanna. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 67–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynes-Rock, M. (2013). Life and death in the multispecies commons. Social Science Information, 52, 210–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. M., Horrocks, J. A., & Baulu, J. (1996). The Barbados vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): Changes in population size and crop damage, 1980–1994. International Journal of Primatology, 17, 831–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, I. (2014). Conservation without nature: The trouble with in situ versus ex situ conservation. Geoforum, 51, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D., & Igoe, J. (2008). Eviction for conservation: A global overview. Conservation and Society, 4, 424–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. (2000). Animals behaving badly: Indigenous perceptions of wildlife protection in Nepal. In J. Knight (Ed.), Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective (pp. 124–144). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. G. (2004). Introduction. In J. G. Carrier (Ed.), Confronting environments: Local understanding in a globalizing world (pp. 1–29). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. G., & West, P. (2009). Introduction. In J. G. Carrier & P. West (Eds.), Virtualism, governance, and practice: Vision and execution in environmental conservation (pp. 1–23). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N., Cash, C., Badmington, N., Braun, B., Murdoch, J., & Whatmore, S. (2004). Mapping posthumanism: An exchange. Environment and Planning A: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, 1341–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A., Gillespie, T., & Goldberg, T. (2005). Primates and the ecologies of their infectious diseases: How will anthropogenic change affect host–parasite interactions? Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins English dictionary (1994). Glasgow: HarperCollins.

  • Coppinger, R. P., & Maguire, J. P. (1980). Cercopithecus aethiops of St. Kitts: A population estimate based on human predation. Caribbean Journal of Science, 15, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, L. A. (2002). Monkey as food, monkey as child: Guajá symbolic cannibalism. In A. Fuentes & L. D. Wolfe (Eds.), Primates face to face: The conservation implications of human and nonhuman primate interconnections (pp. 63–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLoughrey, E. M., Gosson, R. K., & Handley, G. B. (2005). Caribbean literature and the environment: Between nature and culture. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (2012). Beyond nature and culture forms of attachment. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2, 447–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, K. M. (2013). An anthropological investigation of the dynamic humanvervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) interface in St. Kitts, West Indies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.

  • Dore, K. M. (2017a). Navigating the methodological landscape: Ethnographic data expose the nuances of “the monkey problem” in St. Kitts, West Indies. In K. M. Dore, E. P. Riley, & A. Fuentes (Eds.), Ethnoprimatology: A practical guide to research at the human–nonhuman primate interface (pp. 219–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, K. M. (2017b). Vervets in the Caribbean. In A. Fuentes, M. Bezanson, C. J. Campbell, A. F. DiFiore, S. Elton, et al (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of primatology (pp. 1–3). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, K. M., Riley, E. P., & Fuentes, A. (2017). Ethnoprimatology: A practical guide to research at the human–nonhuman primate interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, K. M., Eller, J. L., & Eller, A. R. (2018a). Identity construction and symbolic association in farmervervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) interconnections in St. Kitts. Folia Primatologica, 89(1), 63–80.

  • Dore, K. M., Sewell, D., Mattenet, E., & Turner, T. R. (2018b). GIS and GPS techniques in an ethnoprimatological investigation of St. Kitts vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) crop-raiding behavior. In C. A. Shaffer, F. Dolins, J. R. Hickey, N. P. Nibbelink, & L. Porter (Eds.), GIS and GPS in primatology: A practical guide to spatial analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In press.

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else, J. G. (1991). Nonhuman primates as pests. In H. O. Box (Ed.), Primate responses to environmental change (pp. 155–166). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1996). Constructing nature: Elements for a poststructuralist political ecology. In R. Peet & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation ecologies (pp. 46–68). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1999). Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology, 40, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2008). Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity conservation and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology, 5, 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. (2002). Monkeys, humans, and politics in the Mentawai islands: No simple solutions in a complex world. In A. Fuentes & L. D. Wolfe (Eds.), Primates face to face: The conservation implications of human and nonhuman primate interconnections (pp. 187–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. (2010). Naturecultural encounters in Bali: Monkeys, temples, tourists, and ethnoprimatology. Cultural Anthropology, 25, 600–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human–primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A., & Hockings, K. (2010). The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 841–847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A., & Wolfe, L. (2002). Primates face to face: Conservation implications of human–nonhuman primate interconnections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A., Cortez, A. D., & Peterson, J. V. (2016). Ethnoprimatology and conservation: Applying insights and developing practice. In M. T. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology: Primate conservation in the 21st century (pp. 1–19). Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A., Riley, E. P., & Dore, K. M. (2017). Ethnoprimatology matters: Integration, innovation and intellectual generosity. In K. M. Dore, E. P. Riley, & A. Fuentes (Eds.), Ethnoprimatology: A practical guide to research at the human–nonhuman primate Interface (pp. 297–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gezon, L. L. (1999). Of shrimps and spirit possession: Toward a political ecology of resource management in northern Madagascar. American Anthropologist, 101, 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L. R., & Irwin, M. T. (2007). The evolution of extinction risk: Past and present anthropogenic impacts on the primate communities of Madagascar. Folia Primatologica, 78, 405–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012). Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: A cross-cultural comparison with U.S. samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evolutionary Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloran, A. R. (2016). The many facets of human disturbances at the Tonkolili chimpanzee site. In M. T. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology: Primate conservation in the 21st century (pp. 273–281). Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R., & Remis, M. J. (2006). Biological and cultural anthropology of a changing tropical forest: A fruitful collaboration across subfields. American Anthropologist, 108, 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, E. H., Kennaway, T. A., Pedreros, D. H., Clark, M. L., Marcano-Vega, H., et al (2008). Land cover and forest formation distributions for St. Kitts, Nevis, St. Eustatius, Grenada and Barbados from decision tree classification of cloud-cleared satellite imagery. Caribbean Journal of Science, 44, 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. M. (2002). Primate conservation and local communities: Ethical issues and debates. American Anthropologist, 104, 84–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. M. (2004). Farmers’ perspectives of conflict at the wildlife–agriculture boundary: Some lessons learned from African subsistence farmers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9, 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. M. (2005). People, crops and primates: A conflict of interests. In J. Patterson & J. Wallis (Eds.), Commensalism and conflict: The primate–human interface (pp. 40–59). Norman, OK: American Society of Primatology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. M., & Webber, A. D. (2010). Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human–wildlife conflict scenarios. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 919–924.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. M., Webber, A. D., & Priston, N. E. C. (2017). Understanding conflicts about wildlife: A biosocial approach. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S. (2003). Inhabiting: Landscapes and natures. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), The handbook of cultural geography (pp. 207–225). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, V. K. (2002). A history of St. Kitts: The sweet trade. Oxford: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvalkof, S., & Escobar, A. (1998). Nature, political ecology, and social practice: Toward an academic and political agenda. In A. H. Goodman & T. L. Leatherman (Eds.), Building a new biological synthesis: Political-economic perspectives on human biology (pp. 425–450). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2016). Lines: A brief history. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inniss, S. P. (2005). Forty years of struggle: The birth of the St. Kitts labour movement. Basseterre, St. Kitts: East Caribbean Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalais, A. (2008). Unmasking the cosmopolitan tiger. Nature and Culture, 3, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Gallion, A. (1998). Post-hurricane Georges forestry assessment, St. Kitts, October 19–22, 1998. In: The OECS-Natural Resources Management Unit, Forestry & Wildlife Division, Dominica, 7 Nov 1998.

  • Johnston, C. (2008). Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 633–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2006). A political ecology of wildlife conservation in Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 33, 483–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordon, F., & Gibson, H. (2004). Let your data do the talking: Researching the solo travel experiences of British and American women. In J. Phillimore & L. Goodson (Eds.), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies, and methodologies (pp. 215–235). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost Robinson, C. A., & Remis, M. J. (2014). Entangled realms: Hunters and hunted in the Dzanga Sangha dense Forest reserve (RDS), Central African Republic. Anthropological Quarterly, 87, 613–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, P. G. (2016). Elephant–human dandi: How humans and elephants move through the fringes of forest and village. In P. Locke & J. Buckingham (Eds.), Conflict, negotiation, and coexistence: Rethinking human–elephant relations in South Asia (pp. 242–271). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirksey, E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25, 545–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A. (2004). Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 232–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1999). Monkeys on the move: The natural symbolism of people–macaque conflict in Japan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 58, 622–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2000). Introduction. In J. Knight (Ed.), Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective (pp. 1–35). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottak, C. P. (1999). The new ecological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 101, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1998). To modernize or ecologize? That’s the question. In B. Braun & N. Castree (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium (pp. 221–242). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblan, V. (2013). Introduction: Emerging approaches in the anthropology/primatology borderland. Revue de Primatologie, (5) http://primatologie.revues.org/.

  • Lee, P. C. (2010). Sharing space: Can ethnoprimatology contribute to the survival of nonhuman primates in human-dominated globalized landscapes? American Journal of Primatology, 72, 925–931.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. C. (2017). People, perceptions, and ‘pests:’ Human–wildlife interactions and the politics of conflict. In C. M. Hill, A. D. Webber, & N. E. C. Priston (Eds.), Understanding conflicts about wildlife: A biosocial approach (pp. 15–35). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. C., & Priston, N. J. (2005). Human attitudes to primates: Perceptions of pests, conflict and consequences for primate conservation. In J. Patterson & J. Wallis (Eds.), Commensalism and conflict: The primate–human interface (pp. 1–23). Norman, OK: American Society of Primatology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestel, D., Brunois, F., & Gaunet, F. (2006). Towards an etho-ethnology and an ethno-ethology. Social Science Information, 45, 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, G. (2000). The wolf, the Saami and the urban shaman: Predator symbolism in Sweden. In J. Knight (Ed.), Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective (pp. 170–188). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindshield, S. (2016). Protecting nonhuman primates in peri-urban environments: A case study of Neotropical monkeys, corridor ecology, and coastal economy in the Caribe Sur of Costa Rica. In M. T. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology: Primate conservation in the 21st century (pp. 351–398). Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde, M. (2002). Ethnoecology of monkeys among the Bari of Venezuela: Perception, use and conservation. In A. Fuentes & L. D. Wolfe (Eds.), Primates face to face: The conservation implications of human and nonhuman primate interconnections (pp. 85–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, P. (2013). Explorations in ethnoelephantology: Social, historical, and ecological intersections between Asian elephants and humans. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 4, 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lormier, H. (2006). Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 497–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loudon, J. E., Howells, M. E., & Fuentes, A. (2006). The importance of integrative anthropology: A preliminary investigation employing primatological and cultural anthropological data collection methods in assessing human–monkey co-existence in Bali, Indonesia. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. (2004). Making the monkey: How the Togean macaque went from “new form” to “endemic species” in Indonesians’ conservation biology. Cultural Anthropology, 19, 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1961). Caribbean views of Caribbean land. Canadian Geographer, 5(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, A. F. D. (2003). Land tenure and biodiversity: An exploration in the political ecology of Murang’a district, Kenya. Human Organization, 62, 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, N., Wade, A. H., Fuentes, A., Riley, E. P., Remis, M., & Jost-Robinson, C. (2013). Ethnoprimatology: Critical interdisciplinarity and multispecies approaches in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 34, 8–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, N., Selby, M., & Longo, S. (2014). Political-ecological dimensions of silvery gibbon conservation efforts. International Journal of Sociology, 44, 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. (1993). Provision ground and plantation labor in four winward islands: Competition for resources during slavery. In I. Berlin & P. D. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation and culture: Labor in the shaping of slave life in the Americas (pp. 203–220). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masse, F. (2016). The political ecology of human-wildlife conflict: Producing wilderness, insecurity, and displacement in the Limpopo National Park. Conservation and Society, 14, 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbeme, A. (1992). The banality of power and the asthetics of vulgarity in the postcoloy. Public Culture, 4, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. T. (1974). The St. Kitts vervet. New York: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, T. (2015). A classification system for describing anthropogenic influence on nonhuman primate populations. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, M. R., & Hill, C. M. (2013). Ethical issues in the study and conservation of an African great ape in an unprotected, human-dominated landscape in western Uganda. In J. MacClancy & A. Fuentes (Eds.), Ethics in the field: Contemporary challenges (pp. 42–66). Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, G. C. (1958). The Historical Geography of St. Kitts and Nevis: The West Indies. Mexico City: Instituto Pan Americano de Geografía e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, F. L. (1974). The development of alternative farming systems and prospects for change in the structure of agriculture in St. Kitts, West Indies. Ph.D. thesis, Clark University.

  • Milton, K. (2000). Ducks out of water: Nature conservation as boundary maintenance. In J. Knight (Ed.), Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective (pp. 229–246). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mims, S. L. (1912). Colbert’s West India policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. W. (1985). Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. W. (2010). Houses and yards among Caribbean peasantries. In P. W. Scher (Ed.), Perspectives on the Caribbean: A reader in culture, history, and representation (pp. 9–24). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt: Techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Wallis, J., Rylands, A. B., Ganzhorn, J. U., Oates, J. F., et al (2009). Primates in peril: The world’s 25 most endangered primates 2008–2010. Primate Conservation, 24, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (1996). Maxism, culture, and political ecology: Environmental struggles in Zimbabwe’s Eastern Highlands. In R. Peet & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (pp. 125–147). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, M. H. (1999). Mirrors and windows: Sociocultural studies of human–animal relationships. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L. (1997). Farming the forest edge: Vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Geographical Review, 87:27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. P. (1992). Political ecology of wildlife conservation in the Mt. Meru area of Northeast Tanzania. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation, 3, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novelli, M., & Scarth, A. (2007). Tourism in protected areas: Integrating conservation and community development in Liwonde National Park (Malawi). Tourism and Hospitality Planning and Development, 4, 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyanganji, G., Fowler, A., McNamara, A., & Sommer, V. (2011). Monkeys and apes as animals and humans: Ethno-primatology in Nigeria’s Taraba region. In V. Sommer & C. Ross (Eds.), Primates of Gashaka (pp. 101–134). Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogada, M. O. (2015). HWC 2003 + 10 years: Carnivore-livestock conflicts, tourism, donors, compensation: What about the human dimensions? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 4, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogra, M. V. (2008). Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum, 39, 1408–1422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papworth, S., Milner-Gulland, E. J., & Slocombe, K. (2013). The natural place to begin: The ethnoprimatology of the Waorani. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 1117–1128.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, J. (2005). Residents and immigrants: reactions and perceptions of crop raiding in Masindi District, Uganda. In: J. D. Paterson &J. Wallis (Eds.), Commensalism and conflict: the human-primate interface (pp. 76–89). Norman, OK: American Society of Primatology Publications.

  • Paxson, H. (2008). Post-pasteurian cultures: The microbiopolitics of raw-milk cheese in the United States. Cultural Anthropology, 23, 15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso, N. L. (1993). Coercing conservation: The politics of state resource control. In R. D. Lipschultz & K. Conca (Eds.), The state and social power in global environmental politics: New directions in world politics (pp. 46–70). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, R. B. (1992). Caribbean views on environment and development: A cognitive perspective. Caribbean Geography, 3, 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing, https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Raffles, H. (2011). “Mother nature’s melting pot.” New York Times, April 3.

  • Rangan, H., & Kull, C. H. (2009). What makes ecology ‘political’? Rethinking ‘scale’ in political ecology. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (2000). Chimpanzees as political animals in Sierra Leone. In J. Knight (Ed.), Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective (pp. 78–103). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. C. (1983). Caribbean migrants: Environment and human survival on St. Kitts and Nevis. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, E. P. (2006). Ethnoprimatology: Towards reconciliation of biological and cultural anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, E. P. (2013). Contemporary primatology in anthropology: Beyond the epistemological abyss. American Anthropologist, 115, 411–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, E. P., & Ellwanger, A. (2013). Methods in ethnoprimatology: Exploring the human–nonhuman primate interface. In E. J. Sterling, N. Bynum, & M. E. Blair (Eds.), Primate ecology and conservation: A handbook of techniques (pp. 128–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, E. P., & Priston, N. E. C. (2010). Macaques in farms and folklore: Exploring the human–nonhuman primate interface in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P., & Moore, S. A. (2013). Ecological anxiety disorder: Diagnosing the politics of the anthropocene. Cultural Geographies, 20, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, M. A. (2017). Female spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) cope with anthropogenic disturbance through fissionfusion dynamics. International Journal of Primatology, 38, 838–855.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurr, M. R., Fuentes, A., Luecke, E., Cortes, J., & Shaw, E. (2011). Intergroup variation in stable isotope ratios reflects anthropogenic impact on the barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) of Gibraltar. Primates, 53, 31–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, J. M., Fairet, E., Shutt, K., Waters, S., & Bell, S. (2017). Biosocial conservation: Integrating biological and ethnographic methods to study humanprimate interactions. International Journal of Primatology, 38, 401–426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, G. H. (2002). Primates in Matsigenka: Subsistence and world view. In A. Fuentes & L. D. Wolfe (Eds.), Primates face to face: The conservation implications of human and nonhuman primate interconnections (pp. 101–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2017). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 20th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL international. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.

  • Song, H. (2000). The great pigeon massacre in a deindustrializing American region. In J. Knight (Ed.), Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective (pp. 212–228). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, J., Hill, C. M., & Ainslie, A. (2017). Chimpanzees, sorcery, and contestation in a protected area in Guinea-Bissau. Social Anthropology, 25(3), 364–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sponsel, L. E. (1997). The human niche in Amazonia: Explorations in ethnoprimatology. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), New World primates (pp. 111–159). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, D. (2002). Monkeys in the backyard: Encroaching wildlife and rural communities in Japan. In A. Fuentes & L. D. Wolfe (Eds.), Primates face to face: The conservation implications of human and nonhuman primate interconnections (pp. 254–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K. B. (2010). Long-term field studies: Positive impacts and unintended consequences. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 772–778.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tadie, D., & Fischer, A. (2013). Hunting, social structure and humannature relationships in lower Omo, Ethiopia: People and wildlife at a crossroads. Human Ecology, 41, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. D. (1999). Conflict, environmental change, and social institutions in dryland Africa: Limitations of the community resource management approach. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 643–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest, P., & Peluso, N. L. (1995). Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society, 24, 385–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A. P., & Walters, B. B. (1999). Against political ecology. Human Ecology, 27, 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P. A. (2005). Political ecology: Where is the ecology? Progress in Human Geography, 29, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. T., & White, F. J. (2016). The effects of war on bonobos and other nonhuman primates in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In M. T. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology: Primate conservation in the 21st century (pp. 179–192). Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. (1989). The agrarian question in Africa: Debating the crisis. Progress in Human Geography, 13, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, A. D., & Hill, C. M. (2014). Using participatory risk mapping (PRM) to identify and understand people’s perceptions of crop loss to animals in Uganda. PLoS One, 9, e102912.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, A. D., Hill, C. M., & Reynolds, V. (2007). Assessing the failure of a community-based human–wildlife conflict mitigation project in Budongo Forest reserve, Uganda. Oryx, 41, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, P., & Carrier, J. G. (2004). Ecotourism and authenticity: Getting away from it all? Current Anthropology, 45, 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1980). Ideas of nature. In R. Williams (Ed.), Problems of materialism and culture (pp. 67–85). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witter, R. (2013). Elephant-induced displacement and the power of choice: Moral narratives about resettlement in Mozambique’s Limpopo National Park. Conservation and Society, 11, 406–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (1998). Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature–culture borderlands. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. R. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Wolverton, S., Nolan, J. M., & Ahmed, W. (2014). Ethnobiology, political ecology, and conservation. Journal of Ethnobiology, 34, 125–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynter, S. (1971). Novel and history, plot and plantation. Savacou, 5, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. (1999). Overlapping patchworks of mountain agriculture in Peru and Bolivia: Toward a regional global landscape model. Human Ecology, 27, 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to the University WisconsinMilwaukee for the Chancellor’s Golda Meir Library Scholar Award and Dissertation Fellowship, which funded a portion of this work. Thank you to Dr. Erin Riley and Dr. Sindhu Radakrisha for inviting me to participate in this special issue and the “Expanded Ecologies: Theoretical and Methodological Advancements in the Study of the HumanNonhuman Primate Interface” session at the 2016 joint meeting of the International Primatological Society and the American Society of Primatologists. I want to thank my Ph.D. adviser, Dr. Trudy R. Turner, for her life-changing suggestion that I do my doctoral research in St. Kitts and for her mentorship over the last 13 years. I would also like to thank the St. Kitts Biomedical Research Foundation and RxGen for institutional support during my early work on St. Kitts and for continued support and collaboration. Collecting these data would have been impossible without the support of the St. Kitts government, specifically the Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, the Department of Physical Planning and Environment within the Ministry of Sustainable Development, and the National Archives. I am thankful to each and every member of these organizations for their contributions to and support of this project, but must single out the help I received from Dr. Timothy Harris, Mr. Eugene Hamilton, Dr. Hermia Morton-Anthony, Mr. Gene Knight, Mr. Ashton Stanley, Mr. Alistair Edwards, Ms. Natasha Daniel, Mr. Thomas Jackson, Mr. Melvin James, Mr. Randolph Edmeade, Mr. Eduardo Mattenet, and Mrs. Victoria O’Flaherty. Within the Department of Agriculture, I am especially grateful to my friends Kevin Jeffers and Mark Archibald, who accompanied me every day in the field and who taught me so much about St. Kitts. I want to also thank all of the extension officers within the St. Kitts Department of Agriculture, specifically Nigel Walters, Mark Adams, Oswald Brown, Ronnie Thomas, Stuart Versailles, Ian Chapman, and Lionel Steevens. Finally, former Permanent Secretary of Agriculture, Mr. William F. Dore, was an incredible resource regarding St. Kitts’ agriculture. I must also thank my field assistants, Lindsay Mahovetz, Elizabeth Crabtree, Caitlin Jean Hannah, and Roland Eve, for their friendship and tireless work collecting crop loss data with me in the field, and two of St. Kitts’ best monkey trappers, Gilbert “Sully” Gordon and Joseph Cabey, for their help and insights regarding monkey behaviors. Finally, I would like to thank the mentors and colleagues who have contributed valuable input on material contained in this article: Dr. Carolyn Jost Robinson, Dr. Erin P. Riley, Dr. Agustin Fuentes, Dr. Roberta Palmour, Dr. Susan Kenyon, Andrea Eller, Dr. Jackie Eller, Dr. Aileen Mill, Dr. Pete Robertson, Dr. Steven Rushton, Dr. Tracie McKinney, Dr. Nin Cameron-Smith, and Dr. Michael Muehlenbein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry M. Dore.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Joanna M. Setchell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dore, K.M. Ethnoprimatology without Conservation: The Political Ecology of Farmer–Green Monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus) Relations in St. Kitts, West Indies. Int J Primatol 39, 918–944 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-018-0043-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-018-0043-9

Keywords

Navigation