Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changing doctoral education: the case of US geography

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report on a multi-year research and action project carried out under the aegis of the Association of American Geographers to address the cultures and practices of doctoral programs in the discipline. We explore the diversity of career paths that graduate students seek, the extent to which doctoral programs are responsive to the range of career possibilities, and whether these programs are aware of preferential and contextual differences within the student body, for example, by gender and citizenship. We briefly review the educational resources and activities the project has developed to support change that addresses the research findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Oxford University’s Centre for Excellence in Preparing for Academic Practice; the Professional and Organizational Development in Higher Education; and the Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

  2. Eight focus groups were conducted involving 29 students enrolled in MA/MS and PhD programs. The selection process is described in Solem et al. (2009).

References

  • Association of American Geographers (2011). Guide to Geography Programs in the Americas. 20102011. (Association of American Geographers,Washington DC).

  • Austin, A., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Using doctoral education to prepare faculty to work within Boyer’s four domains of scholarship. New Directions for Institutional Research, 129(Spring), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbit, V., Rudd, E., Morrison, E., Picciano, J., Nerad, M. (2008). Careers of Geography PhDs: Findings from Social Science PhDs-Five + Years Out. (CIRGE Report 2008–02. CIRGE: Seattle, WA). http://wwwmcirge.washington.edu.

  • Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP). (1995). Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C., Dore, T. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. (The Pew Charitable Trusts, Philadelphia, PA). http://www.phd-survey.org.

  • Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, P. L., Borkowski, N. A. (Eds.). (2006). The Assessment of Doctoral Education:Emerging Criteria and New Models for Improving Outcomes. (Stylus Publishing, Sterling VA).

  • Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: Criticisms, facts and remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlemper, M. B. (2011). Challenges and coping in graduate school. The Geographical Bulletin, 52(2), 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlemper, M. B., & Monk, J. (2011). Discourses on diversity: Perspectives from graduate program in geography in the United States. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M., & Foote, K. (2004). Concerns, attitudes, and abilities of early career geography faculty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 889–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M., & Foote, K. (2009). Teaching College Geography: A practical guide for graduate students and early career faculty. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M., Foote, K., & Monk, J. (2009a). Aspiring academics: A resource book for graduate students and early career faculty. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M., Foote, K., & Monk, J. (2013). Practicing Geography: Careers for enhancing society and the environment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M., Hopwood, N., & Schlemper, B. (2011). Experiencing graduate school: A comparative analysis of students in geography programs. The Professional Geographer, 63(1), 1–16.

  • Solem, M., Lee, J., & Schlemper, B. (2009b). Departmental climate and student experiences in geography graduate programs. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 268–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D., Austin, A. (Eds.). (2004) Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. (JosseyBass, San Francisco).

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for EDGE comes from the NSF Research on Learning and Evaluation program (REC-0439914) program and the Research and Evaluation on Education in Science and Engineering program (DRL-0910041). Further information about EDGE including a project bibliography is available at www.aag.org/edge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janice Monk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monk, J., Solem, M. Changing doctoral education: the case of US geography. GeoJournal 80, 187–191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9586-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9586-2

Keywords

Navigation