Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conceptualising the PhD as preparing for academic practice in geography

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper situates the geography PhD within the broader context of doctoral education. It addresses questions relating to the PhD as preparation for future academic work. Theoretical and practical ideas are woven through a discussion of the work of the Centre for Excellence in Preparing for Academic Practice, at the University of Oxford, UK. The Centre initiated wide-ranging reforms and has had lasting impacts, with a philosophy of remaining sensitive to disciplinary context. The paper argues that cultural historical activity theory is a useful lens for understanding challenges in contemporary doctoral education, and responses to them. Key concepts are outlined, and a worked example provided, drawing from the Centre’s work. Connections are made with relevant initiatives specific to geography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Centre for Excellence in Preparing for Academic Practice was one of 74 Centres for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETLs), funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England from 2005–2010. For more information about the story of the CETL, see http://www.cetlrecord.ox.ac.uk/. The CETL also produced an extensive suite of learning and development resources for research students and those supporting them, see http://www.apprise.ox.ac.uk/. Both authors worked in the Centre at the time.

  2. For example, the Enhancing Departments in Graduate Education in Geography (EDGE) research and action project (http://www.aag.org/edge), and opportunities for graduates to become involved in service / organisation at the Association’s Annual Meeting.

  3. See http://www.colorado.edu/geography/gfda/gfda.html.

  4. While all the subject centres have now been discontinued due to budget cuts, similar resources for each field (primarily teaching-focused) are expected to be made available by the UK Higher Education Academy in the coming year.

References

  • Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialisation to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, C., Jazvak-Martek, M., & McAlpine, L. (2009). Studying doctoral education: Using Activity Theory to shape methodological tools. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 36(3), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N., & Stocks, C. (2009). Research and development for early career academics: Encouraging signs, but are we talking past each other? International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., & Hopwood, N. (2009). ‘Third spaces’: A useful developmental lens? International Journal for Academic Development, 14(2), 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. D., Woodford, B. J., & Rogers, D. L. (2004). Re-envisioning the PhD: A challenge for the twenty-first century. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 194–216). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2007). Redefining the doctorate. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (2002). SET for Success: Final report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ Review. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi-Grohn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Conceptualising transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 19–38). Oxford: Pergamon.

  • Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Conklin Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Wertsch, J., del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (Eds.). (1996). Sociocultural studies: History, action and mediation. In Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wulff, D. H., & Austin, A. E. (Eds.). (2004). Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWNFF (Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation). (2005). The Responsive PhD: Innovations in US doctoral education. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Hopwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hopwood, N., McAlpine, L. Conceptualising the PhD as preparing for academic practice in geography. GeoJournal 80, 203–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9585-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9585-3

Keywords

Navigation