Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Equivalent Continuum Simulations of Geocell Reinforced Sand Beds Supporting Strip Footings

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an equivalent continuum method for simulating the behaviour of geocell reinforced sand foundation beds, using finite element technique. An equivalent composite model is used for numerically simulating the improvement in the strength and stiffness of sand confined with geocells. Shear strength of geocell encased sand is derived from the additional confining pressure due to geocell using hoop tension theory. The stiffness of geocell encased sand is represented by an empirical equation in terms of the stiffness of the unreinforced sand and the tensile modulus of the geocell material. Numerical simulations of strip footings resting on sand bed are carried out with and without geocell layer, varying parameters like, the dimensions of geocell layer, pocket size, depth of placement of geocell layer and the tensile modulus of the geocell material. The results of numerical analyses are validated with the corresponding experimental results. The comparison between the numerical results and the experimental results is found to be reasonably good. Some significant observations on the mechanism of geocell reinforcement have been presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Jarrett PM (1989) Large-scale model tests of geo-composite mattresses over Peat subgrades, Transportation Research Record 1188. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Karpurapu R (1993) Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils. Geotech Testing J, ASTM 16:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Knight MA (1998) Analysis of geocell reinforced soil covers over large span conduits. Computers Geotechn 22:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush DI, Jenner CG, Bassett RH (1990) The design and construction of geocell foundation mattress supporting embankments over soft ground. Geotextiles Geomembranes 9:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowland JW, Wong SCK (1993) Performance of a road embankment on soft clay supported on a geocell mattress foundation. Geotextiles Geomembranes 12:687–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotextiles Geomembranes 19(4):235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) Non-linear analysis of stress and strain in soils. J Soil Mech Foundations Division ASCE 96:1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Byrne P, Wong KS, Mabry P (1980) Strength stress-strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element analyses of stresses and movements in soil masses. Report No. UCB/GT/80-01, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Henkel DJ, Gilbert GC (1952) The effect of rubber membranes on the measured triaxial compression strength of clay samples. Geotechnique 3:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K, Madhavi Latha G (2000) Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over soft clay foundation. Geotech Testing J ASTM 23:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavi Latha G (2000) Investigations on the behaviour of geocell supported embankments. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai

  • Madhavi Latha G, Rajagopal K (2007) Parametric finite element analyses of geocell supported embankments. Can Geotech J 44(8):917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagtegaal JC, Parks DM, Rice JR (1974) On numerically accurate finite element solutions in the fully plastic range. Computer Methods Appl Mech Eng 4:153–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak GC, Zienkiewicz OC (1972) Elasto plastic stress analysis, generalisation for various constitutive relations including strain softening. Int J Numerical Anal Methods Eng 5:113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal K (1998) Users Manual for the Finite Element Program GEOFEM. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal K, Bathurst RJ (1992) Numerical investigation of controlled yielding of soil-retaining wall structures. Geotextiles Geomembranes 11:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal K, Bathurst RJ (1993) Users manual for Geotechnical Finite Element Modelling GEOFEM. Department of Civil Engineering, Royal Military College, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal K, Bathurst RJ (1995) Behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls using the finite element method. Computers Geotechnics 17:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal K, Sireesha G (1998) Finite element analysis of bearing capacity of soils. Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference, December, New Delhi, pp 167–170

  • Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR, Madhavi Latha G (1999) Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotextiles Geomembranes 17:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal K, Madhavi Latha G, Krishnaswamy NR (2001) Finite element analysis of embankments supported on geocell layer using composite model. In: Desai et al. (eds) Computer methods and advances in geomechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1251–1254

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea C, Mitchell JK (1978) Sand reinforcement using paper grid cells. ASCE Spring Convention and Exhibit, Preprint 3130, Pittsburgh, PA, April, pp 24–28

  • Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2005) Model studies of a circular footing supported on geocell-reinforced clay. Can Geotech J 42(2):693–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India

    G. Madhavi Latha

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, 781039, India

    Sujit Kumar Dash

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India

    K. Rajagopal

Authors
  1. G. Madhavi Latha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sujit Kumar Dash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Rajagopal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Madhavi Latha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madhavi Latha, G., Dash, S.K. & Rajagopal, K. Equivalent Continuum Simulations of Geocell Reinforced Sand Beds Supporting Strip Footings. Geotech Geol Eng 26, 387–398 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9176-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9176-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation