Skip to main content
Log in

Rural Poverty Reduction through Business Partnerships? Examples of Experience from the Forestry Sector

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the Earth Summit in Johannesburg in 2002, partnerships were touted as one of the key routes to sustainable development. But can partnerships really deliver improvements to rural livelihoods? This paper reviews one set of claimed partnerships, those between forestry companies and local individuals or communities, to assess the benefits, and the costs, to local livelihoods. Most arrangements between forestry companies and local communities are not equitable enough to be called partnerships, so the term “deal” is preferred. Positive local impacts of company–community deals include sharing of risks, better returns to land than otherwise possible, opportunities for income diversification, access to paid employment, development of new skills, upgrading of local infrastructure and environmental improvement. However, company–community deals have not yet proved sufficient to lift people out of poverty. They remain supplementary rather than central to income generation. Furthermore, while some deals have resulted in greater cohesion and organisation among community groups, there is as yet little evidence of substantial increases in community bargaining power. Ways forward to increase returns to communities (and to their counterpart companies) centre on moving towards more equal partnerships, by raising community bargaining power, fostering the roles of brokers and other third parties, and developing equitable, efficient and accountable governance frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew, M., Fabricius, C., & Timmermans, H. (2000). An overview of private sector community partnerships in forestry and other natural resources in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Tshwane, South Africa: Environmentek CSIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. E. M. (1997). Trees as out-grower crops for forest industries: Experience from the Philippines and South Africa, Rural Development Forestry Network, Network Paper 22a (winter 1997/98). London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, D. (2001). Civil society collaboration with business: bringing empowerment back in. World Development, 29, 1097–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babine (2001). About Babine First Nations participation, http://www.babineefmpp.com/babine/index.html.

  • Baumann, P. (2000). Equity and efficiency in contract farming schemes: The experience of agricultural tree crops, ODI Working Paper 139. London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute.

  • Cairns, R. (2000). Outgrower timber schemes in KwaZulu-Natal: Do they build sustainable rural livelihoods and what interventions should be made? Tshwane, South Africa: Environmentek CSIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrere, R., & Lohmann, L. (1996). Pulping the South: Industrial tree plantations and the world paper economy. London, United Kingdom: Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Leach, M. (1987). Trees to meet contingencies: Savings and security for the rural poor, Rural Development Forestry Network Paper 5a. London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Magagula, L., & von Maltitz, G. (1997). Timber farming: Increasing the contribution by small growers to timber production, National Forestry Action Programme Industrial Forestry Working Group Key Issues Paper. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Isaacs, M. (2005). Forestry contractors in South Africa: What role in reducing poverty? Small and Medium Forestry Enterprise Series 10, Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa, and International Institute for Environment and Development, London, United Kingdom.

  • Curtis, A., & Race, D. (1998). Links between farm forestry growers and the wood processing industry: Lessons from the Green triangle, Tasmania and Western Australia. Report for Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC Publication No. 98/41, Canberra, Australia.

  • Del Gatto, F. (2000). Company–community partnerships in the forest sector: Case studies from Central America, Unpublished MSc thesis, Oxford Forestry Institute and Green College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

  • Desmond, H., & Race, D. (2000). Global survey and analytical framework for forestry out-grower arrangements. Rome, Italy: Department of Forestry, Australian National University, for Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID & FAO (2001). How forests can reduce poverty. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations and United Kingdom: Department for International Development, London.

  • Echanove, F., & Steffen C. (2005). Agribusiness and farmers in Mexico: the importance of contractual arrangements. The Geographical Journal, 171, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, D., & Kusterer, K. (1990). Small farmers, big business: contract farming and rural development. London, United Kingdom: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawan, G., & Muhtaman, D. R. (2000). A case study on a forestry-based corporate community partnership in KPH Kuningan, West Java, Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia: Lembaga Alam Tropika Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M., Matikinca, P., Mitchell, D., Brown, F., Lewis, F., Mahlangu, I., Msimang, A., Nixon, P., & Radebe, T. (2005). Small-scale timber production in South Africa: what role in reducing poverty? Small and Medium Forest Enterprise Series 9. London, United Kingdom: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C. (eds) (2002). Production, privatisation and preservation in Papua New Guinea forestry. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea: National Research Institute.

  • LATIN (2000). Corporate community partnership between PT Xylo Indah Pratama and the local community in Musi Rawas District, South Sumatera—Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia: Lembaga Alam Tropika Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarabhirom, P., & Mochida, H. (1999). A study on contract tree farming in Thailand. Bulletin of Tsukuba University Forests 15.

  • Masakure, O., & Henson, S. (2005). Why do small-scale producers choose to produce under contract? Lessons from nontraditional vegetable exports from Zimbabwe. World Development, 33, 1721–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, J., Roe, D., & McGranahan, G. (2001). Corporate-community partnerships, The Future is Now, Vol. 2, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, United Kingdom.

  • Mayers, J., & Vermeulen, S. (2002a). Power from the trees: How good forestry governance can help reduce poverty, IIED Opinion paper for the World Summit on Sustainable Development. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, United Kingdom.

  • Mayers, J., & Vermeulen, S. (2002b). Company–community forestry partnerships: From raw deals to mutual gains? London, United Kingdom: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, N., & Ota, M. (2002). Export horticulture and poverty in Kenya, IDS Working Paper 174. Brighton, United Kingdom: Institute of Development Studies.

  • NAFA and Institute on Governance (2000). Aboriginal-forest sector partnerships: lessons for future collaboration, Canada: National Aboriginal Forestry Association, Ottawa and Ottawa, Canada: Institute on Governance.

  • Nawir, A. A., & Santoso, L. (2005). Mutually beneficial company–community partnerships in plantation development: emerging lessons from Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 7, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojwang, A. (2000). Community-company partnerships in forestry in South Africa: an examination of trends. Tshwane, South Africa: Environmentek CSIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, T., Pajari, B., Tuomasjukka, T. (eds) (2003). Forests in poverty reduction strategies: capturing the potential. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.

  • Roberts, S. & Dubois, O. (1996). The role of social/farm forestry schemes in supplying fibre to the pulp and paper industry, Towards a Sustainable Paper Cycle Series 6. London, United Kingdom: International Institute for Environment and Development.

  • Saigal, S., & Kashyap, D. (2000). Review of company–farmer partnerships for the supply of raw material to the wood-based industry. Delhi, India: Ecotech Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr, S., White, A., & Kaimowitz, D. (2002). Making markets work for forest communities. Washington DC, United States of America: Forest Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisitka, L. (2000). Private-sector community partnerships in forestry in the Eastern Cape: the Umzimkulu case study and the Lambazi case study. Tshwane, South Africa: Environmentek CSIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tim Dimas (2000). Seminar sehari: hasil orientasi terhadap pelaksanaan kegiatan pengembangan masyarakat di PT Finnantara Intiga. West Kalimantan, Indonesia: PT Finnantara Intiga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P. (2000). UN-Business Partnerships: whose agenda counts? UNRISD News 23. Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

  • Vermeulen, S., & Mayers, J. (2006) Partnerships between forestry companies and local communities: mechanisms for efficiency, equity, resilience and accountability, In M. A. F. Ros-Tonen (Ed.), Partnerships in sustainable forest management: Learning from Latin America, CEDLA Latin America Studies 94. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers.

  • Vidal, N. (2005a). Forest company–community agreements in Mexico: identifying succesful models. Washington DC, United States of America: Forest Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, N. (2005b) Forest company–community agreements in Brazil: current status and opportunities for action. Washington DC, United States of America: Forest Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2001). Partnerships—how do they impact poverty elimination? Business Partners for Development—Natural Resources Cluster, Presentation to a discussion at the International Business Leaders Forum, 23 October 2001, London, United Kingdom.

  • Warning, M., & Soo Hoo, W. (2000). The impact of contract farming on income distribution: theory and evidence, Paper presented at the Western Economic Association International Annual Meeting, 30 June 2000.

  • Westvaco (2001). Cooperative forest management, www.westvaco.com/environment/sfidata/cfm/cfm.htm.

  • White, D. (2001). Public embarrassment over private partnerships’ failings. Financial Times, 20 January 2001, London, United Kingdom.

  • Yeboah, R. (2001). Short report on social responsibility agreements in Ghana, sub-study for the Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry project. London, United Kingdom: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingel, J. (2000). Between the woods and the trees: outgrower schemes in KwaZulu-Natal. Tshwane, South Africa: Environmentek CSIR.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to our many research partners who provided the information reported here. Chip Fay and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. The IIED project Instruments for sustainable private sector forestry was supported by the European Commission and the UK Department for International Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Vermeulen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vermeulen, S., Nawir, A.A. & Mayers, J. Rural Poverty Reduction through Business Partnerships? Examples of Experience from the Forestry Sector. Environ Dev Sustain 10, 1–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9035-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9035-6

Keywords

Navigation