Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of indoor air quality (IAQ) objectives on air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is costly to sample all air pollutants of a general community. Air sampling should be conducted based on a practical assessment strategy and monitoring plan. In Hong Kong, the Environmental Protection Department (HKEPD) launched an Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) certification scheme to grade workplace IAQ as ‘Excellent’ or ‘Good’ by measuring the levels of nine common indoor air pollutants, namely carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), respirable suspended particulates (RSP), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), formaldehyde (HCHO), total volatile organic compounds (TVOC), radon (Rn), and airborne bacteria count (ABC). Although average office IAQ performance has been improved since the implementation of this certification scheme, there are still resource issues and technical difficulties. To streamline the assessment of office IAQ performance, this study proposes a simple index of IAQ benchmarks formulated in compliance with the HKEPD requirements. In particular, three of the nine listed common air pollutants were selected as the ‘representatives’ for the overall satisfactory IAQ. Together with the assessment results of 422 Hong Kong air-conditioned offices, the index was evaluated in terms of test sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Proved to be feasible to describe the IAQ of some air-conditioned offices, this IAQ index would be a useful tool for policymakers, building owners and professionals to quantify IAQ performance in offices and to make decisions on resources and manpower management for efficient mitigation actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ANSI/ASHRAE 62-2004, Design for acceptable indoor air quality. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc 2004.

  • Burnett, J. (2005). Indoor air quality certification scheme for Hong Kong buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 14(3–4), 201–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y., Chan, Y., & Ho, L. (2001). Feasibility study of an Indoor Air Quality measurement protocol on 12 parameters in mechanically ventilated and air-conditioned buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 10(1), 3–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, K. W., & Chong, K. Y. (2001). Development and application of an indoor air quality audit to an air-conditioned building in Singapore. Building and Environment, 36(2), 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, W. K., & Wong, L. T. (1994). Experimental studies on air diffusion of a linear diffuser and associated thermal comfort indices in an air-conditioned space. Building and Environment, 29(4), 523–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of European Normalization (CEN). (1999). Ventilation for buildings: Design criteria for the indoor environment. Brussels, Luxembourg, CR1752: Commission of the European Communities, Directorate General for Science, Research and Development Joint Research Centre – Environment Institute.

  • ENV Ministry of the Environment (1996). Singapore guidelines for good indoor air quality in office premises. Singapore: National Environment Agency 19th Storey, Environment Building, 40 Scott Road. The Quarantine & Epidemiology Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Australia (2001). State of knowledge report: Air toxics and indoor air quality in Australia. Australian Government: Department of the Environment and Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanger P. O. (1972). Thermal comfort. McGraw-Hill: NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. C., Krylov, V. V., & McGrath, P. T. (1995). Contamination of indoor air by toxic soil vapours: A screening risk assessment model. Building and Environment, 30(3), 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (1987). Exposure Guidelines for Residential Indoor Air Quality. A Report of the Federal-Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health. Ottawa: Environmental Health Dorectorate, Health Protection Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • HKEPD (1997). Final report – Consultancy study of indoor air pollution in offices and public places in Hong Kong. Agreement No. CE 14/95. HKSAR: Hong Kong Government, Environmental Protection Department, Air Services Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • HKEPD Indoor Air Quality Information Centre (2003). Indoor air quality certification scheme for offices and public places. China: Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, J. A. (2003). Health effects due to indoor air pollution. Indoor and Built Environment, 12(6), 427–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, P. S., Mui, K. W., & Wong, L. T. (2006). Feasibility study of an express assessment protocol (EPA) for indoor air quality of air-conditioned offices. Indoor and Built Environment, 15(4), 365–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Indoor Air Quality Management Group (IAQMG). (1999). The government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: Guidance Notes for the Management of Indoor Air Quality in Offices and Public Places.

  • Jokl, M. V. (2000). Evaluation of indoor air quality using the decibel concept based on carbon dioxide and TVOC. Building and Environment, 35(8), 677–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Mee, A. P. (2002). Statistics for social data analysis (4th ed.) Australia: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraenzmer, M. (1999). Modeling and continuous monitoring of indoor air pollutants for identification of sources and sinks. Environment International, 25(5), 541–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. C., Guo, H., Li, W. M., & Chan, L. Y. (2002). Inter-comparison of air pollutant concentrations in different indoor environments in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 36(12), 1929–1940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millard, S. P. (2002). Environmental stats for S-plus (2nd ed.) Springer: NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhle, G., Crump, D., Brown, V., Hunter, C., Squire, R., Mann, H., et al. (2003). Development and application of a protocol for the assessment of indoor air quality. Indoor and Built Environment, 12(3), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschandreas, D. J., & Sofuoglu, S. C. (2004). The indoor environmental index and its relationship with symptoms of office building occupants. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 54(11), 1440–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mui, K. W., & Wong, L. T. (2004). Evaluation on sampling period for assessing indoor radon level with a long-term measurement of Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 38(39), 6711–6723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mui, K. W., Wong, L. T., & Ho, W. L. (2006b). Evaluation on sampling point densities for assessing indoor air quality. Building and Environment, 41(11), 1515–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mui, K. W., Wong, L. T., & Hui, P. S. (2006a). A new sampling approach for assessing indoor air quality. Indoor and Built Environment, 15(2), 165–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhar, S. C., Tham, K. W., Cheong, K. W., & Wong, N. H. (2000). A study of indoor pollutant standard index (IPSI) and building symptom index (BSI). Proceedings of Healthy Building, Espoo, Finland 1:145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1989). Report to congress on indoor air quality, volume II: Assessment and control of indoor pollution. Washington, USEPA, USA: EPA400-1-89-001C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womble, S. E., Girman, J. R., Ronca, E. L., Axelrad, R., Brightman, H. S., & McCarthy, J. F. (1995). Developing Baseline Information on Buildings and Indoor Air Quality (BASE '94): Part I -Study Design, Building Selection, and Building Descriptions. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, September 11–14.

  • Wong, L. T., Mui, K. W., & Hui, P. S. (2006). A statistical model for characterizing common air pollutants in air-conditioned offices. Atmospheric Environment, 40(23), 4246–4257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. T., Mui, K. W., & Hui, P. S. (2008). A multivariate-logistic model of acceptance for indoor environment quality (IEQ) in offices. Building and Environment, 43(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2005). WHO air quality guidelines global update. Report on a working group meeting. Germany: Bonn 18–20 October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling-Tim Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hui, PS., Mui, KW. & Wong, LT. Influence of indoor air quality (IAQ) objectives on air-conditioned offices in Hong Kong. Environ Monit Assess 144, 315–322 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9994-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9994-6

Keywords

Navigation