Abstract
Learning environment has always been traditionally associated with the physical presence of classrooms, textbooks, pen-and-paper examinations and teachers. However, today’s evolving technology has rapidly changed the face of education. Online learning, teleconferencing, internet, Computer Assisted Learning (CAL), Web-Based Distance Learning (WBDL) and other technologies are integrated in education. This blended learning environment has become the major role in training and education scene. This paper focuses on a set of quantitative data pertaining to the perception of blended learning, attitude towards technology, effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning by using path analysis. Data were drawn from a group of business students who were engaged in blended learning environment. This study intends to find out the effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning in Malaysia tertiary institutions. The empirical results confirm that blended learning does enhance student’s learning experience and learning outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham: Sloan-C.
Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, 2005. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. Annotated bibliography on technology for distance education: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center. Retrieved January 28, 2005, from http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/.
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for ‘neomillennial’ learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 15.1–15.22). Boulder: Educause.
Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P., Sorg, S., & Truman, B. (2004). Three ALN modalities: An institutional perspective. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Into the mainstream (pp. 127–148). Needham: Sloan-C.
Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: the evolution of the online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 59–65.
Howell, S. L., Laws, R. D., & Lindsay, N. K. (2004). Reevaluating course completion in distance education: avoiding the comparison between apples and oranges. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(4), 243–252.
MacDonald, J. (2006). Blended learning and online tutoring: A good practice guide, gower publishing company. ISBN13: 9780566086595.
McCombs, B., & Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107, 1582–1600.
Niemiec, M., & Otte, G. (2006). Blended learning in higher education: A report from the Sloan-C 2005 Workshop. Needham: Sloan-C.
Noppe, I., Achterberg, J., Duquaine, L., Huebbe, M., Williams, C. (2007). PowerPoint presentation handouts and college student learning outcomes. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (IJSOTL), Vol. 1: No. 1, Article 9.
Osguthorpe, R., & Graham, C. (2003). Blended learning environments: definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.
Reasons, S.G., Valadares, K., & Slavkin, M. (2005). Questioning the hybrid model: student outcomes in different course formats. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(1), 83–94.
Russell, T. (2001). The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research. Technology for distance education. Montgomery, AL: IDECC.
Tagg, J. (2003). The learning paradigm. Bolton: Anker.
Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1–12.
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-center teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wu, D., & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 139–151.
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Lai, B. Y. C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836–1884.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wai, C.C., Seng, E.L.K. Measuring the effectiveness of blended learning environment: A case study in Malaysia. Educ Inf Technol 20, 429–443 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9293-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9293-5