Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three decades ago, planned obsolescence was a widely discussed ethical issue in marketing classrooms. Planned obsolescence is topical again today because an increasing emphasis on continuous product development promotes shorter durables replacement and disposal cycles with troublesome environmental consequences. This paper offers explanations of why product obsolescence is practiced and why it works. It then examines the ethical responsibilities of product developers and corporate strategists and their differing responses to this problem. Pro-environment product design and marketing practices and innovative government policies may alleviate the problem over time. However, given the current lack of understanding about consumer replacement and disposal behavior, it is questionable as to whether these practices and policies will be sufficiently informed to be effective. Thus, marketing scholars have a significant opportunity to contribute to sustainable durables product development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolphson, D. (2004). A New Perspective on Ethics, Ecology, and Economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press: 2007, ‹Destination of Recycled Electronics May Surprise You’ http://www.computertakeback.com/news_and_resources/destination.cfm. Accessed 11 November 2007

  • Boland, M. (2001) Water and the Environment. Forbes, 168(6), 60–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, D., Lemon, K., and Staelin, R. (2001) The Impact of Firm Introductory Strategies on Consumers’ Perceptions of Future Product Introductions and Purchase Decisions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, J. (1983) Extending Product Lifetime: Prospects and Opportunities. European Journal of Marketing, 17, 34–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J. (1986) An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 729–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byggeth, S., Broman, G., and Robert, K. (2007) A Method for Sustainable Product Development Based on a Modular System of Guiding Questions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcott, P. and Walls, M. (2000) Can Downstream Waste Disposal Policies Encourage Upstream Design for Environment? American Economic Review, 90, 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcott, P., and Walls, M. (2005) Waste, Recycling, and Design for Environment: Roles for Markets and Policy Instruments. Resource and Energy Economics, 27, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervini, L.: 2005, ‹TV: Shoppers Choose Quality over Size’, TWICE June 20, 22

  • Charter, M., Tischner, U. (2001) Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future. Greenleaf: Sheffield UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, M., Kalamas, M., Laroche, M. (2005) Shades of Green: Linking Environmental Locus of Control and Pro-environmental Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T. (2004) Inadequate Life? Evidence of Consumer Attitudes to Product Obsolescence. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2005) Ethics and Altruism: What Constitutes Socially Responsible Design? Design Management Review, 16, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrao, P., Amaral, J. (2006) Design for Recycling in the Automobile Industry: New Approaches and New Tools. Journal of Engineering Design, 17, 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, R. (2000) Your Lifetime Guarantee Won’t Guarantee Sales. Upholstery Design & Management, 13, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaretta, E. (2005) Ethical Product Innovation: In Praise of Slowness. The TQM Magazine, 17, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P., Hatch, N. (2006) Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., Mehta, R., Kardes, F. (2004) The Timing of Repeat Purchase of Consumer Durable Goods: The Role of Functional Bases of Consumer Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, M.: 2007, ‹Sony Champions Free Recycling’, Fortune, August 22

  • Hua, S., Wemmerlov, U. (2006) Product Change Intensity, Product Advantage and Market Performance: An Empirical Investigation into the PC Industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka, T. (2007) An Empirical Analysis of Planned Obsolescence. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 191–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, G. (1999) Business, Consumers, and Sustainable Living in an Interconnected World: A Multilateral Ecocentric Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, M., et al. (2007) Design for Adaptability – A New Concept for Achieving Sustainable Design. Robotics & Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 23, 727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., Burgess, S. (2005) The Development of a Remanufacturing Platform Design: A Strategic Response to the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 219(Part B), 623–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leire, C., and Thidell, A. (2005) Product-related Environmental Information to Guide Consumer Purchases –Research on Perceptions, Understanding and Use among Nordic Consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 1061–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, R. (2005) Integrated Product Policy – a New Regulatory Paradigm for a Consumer Society?. European Environmental Law Review, 14, 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1985) Ethics and the Supply of Status Goods. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 457–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D., and van de Horst, R. (2003) Developing Sustainable Products and Services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 883–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, J. (2007) The Effect of Income Growth on the Mix of Purchases Between Disposable Goods and Reusable Goods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moisander, J. (2007) Motivational Complexity of Green Consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niva, M. and Timonen, P. (2001) The Role of Consumers in Product-oriented Environmental Policy: Can the Consumer be the Driving Force for Environmental Improvements? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25, 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, V. (1960) The Waste Makers (David McKay, NewYork).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D. (2006) Eco-innovation and New Product Development: Understanding the Influences on Market Performance. Technovation, 26, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. and Jobber, D. (1994) Product Replacement: Strategies for Simultaneous Product Deletion and Launch. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, G. (2006) Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America. (Harvard University Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, V. (2000) Sustainability – in Light of Competitiveness. Ecological Economics, 34, 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. and Golder, P. (2001) Will & Vision (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgerson, J. (2000) Psychological Determinants of Paying Attention to Eco-label in Purchase Decisions: Model Development and Multinational Validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingstrom, J., and Karlsson, R. (2006) The Relationship between Environmental Analyses and the Dialogue Process in New Product Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1409–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffel, M. (2004) Strategic Management of Product Recovery. California Management Review, 46, 120–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utaka, A. (2006a) Durable-goods Warranties and Social Welfare. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22, 508–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Nes, N. and Cramer, J. (2006) Product Lifetime Optimization: A Challenging Strategy towards More Sustainable Consumption Patterns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1307–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. (2002) Moral Imagination and Systems Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, R. (1997) Discounting and its Impact on Durables Buying Decisions. Marketing Science, 8, 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development: 2000, Eco-Efficiency: Creating More Value with Less Impact (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva)

  • Zafarmand, S., Suguyama, K., and Watanabe, M. (2003) Aesthetics and Sustainability: The Aesthetic Attributes Promoting Sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 3, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marketing, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, U.S.A.

    Joseph Guiltinan

Authors
  1. Joseph Guiltinan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Guiltinan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guiltinan, J. Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence. J Bus Ethics 89 (Suppl 1), 19–28 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9907-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9907-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation