Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of complementary and alternative medicine and breast cancer survival in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common among breast cancer patients, but less is known about whether CAM influences breast cancer survival.

Methods

Health Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) Study participants (n = 707) were diagnosed with stage I–IIIA breast cancer. Participants completed a 30-month post-diagnosis interview including questions on CAM use (natural products such as dietary and botanical supplements, alternative health practices, and alternative medical systems), weight, physical activity, and comorbidities. Outcomes were breast cancer-specific and total mortality, which were ascertained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registries in Western Washington, Los Angeles County, and New Mexico. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to data to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for mortality. Models were adjusted for potential confounding by sociodemographic, health, and cancer-related factors.

Results

Among 707 participants, 70 breast cancer-specific deaths and 149 total deaths were reported. 60.2 % of participants reported CAM use post-diagnosis. The most common CAM were natural products (51 %) including plant-based estrogenic supplements (42 %). Manipulative and body-based practices and alternative medical systems were used by 27 and 13 % of participants, respectively. No associations were observed between CAM use and breast cancer-specific (HR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.61–1.76) or total mortality (HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.63–1.29).

Conclusion

Complementary and alternative medicine use was not associated with breast cancer-specific mortality or total mortality. Randomized controlled trials may be needed to definitively test whether there is harm or benefit from the types of CAM assessed in HEAL in relation to mortality outcomes in breast cancer survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2015) Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65(1):5–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, Lipkus IM et al (2007) Main outcomes of the FRESH START trial: a sequentially tailored, diet and exercise mailed print intervention among breast and prostate cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2709–2718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Hedderson MM, Schwartz SM, Standish LJ, Bowen DJ (2003) Changes in diet, physical activity, and supplement use among adults diagnosed with cancer. J Am Diet Assoc 103(3):323–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams RN, Mosher CE, Blair CK, Snyder DC, Sloane R, Demark-Wahnefried W (2015) Cancer survivors’ uptake and adherence in diet and exercise intervention trials: an integrative data analysis. Cancer 121(1):77–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM et al (2015) Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 65(3):167–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burstein HJ, Gelber S, Guadagnoli E, Weeks JC (1999) Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340(22):1733–1739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL et al (1998) Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 280(18):1569–1575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mao JJ, Palmer SC, Straton JB et al (2008) Cancer survivors with unmet needs were more likely to use complementary and alternative medicine. J Cancer Surviv 2(2):116–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthews AK, Sellergren SA, Huo D, List M, Fleming G (2007) Complementary and alternative medicine use among breast cancer survivors. J Altern Complement Med 13(5):555–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wanchai A, Armer JM, Stewart BR (2010) Complementary and alternative medicine use among women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Clin J Oncol Nurs 14(4):E45–E55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedderson MM, Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML et al (2004) Sex differences in motives for use of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients. Altern Ther Health Med 10(5):58–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Hedderson MM et al (2002) Types of alternative medicine used by patients with breast, colon, or prostate cancer: predictors, motives, and costs. J Altern Complement Med 8(4):477–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McLay JS, Stewart D, George J, Rore C, Heys SD (2012) Complementary and alternative medicines use by Scottish women with breast cancer. What, why and the potential for drug interactions? Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68(5):811–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedersen CG, Christensen S, Jensen AB, Zachariae R (2009) Prevalence, socio-demographic and clinical predictors of post-diagnostic utilisation of different types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a nationwide cohort of Danish women treated for primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 45(18):3172–3181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rebbeck TR, Troxel AB, Norman S et al (2007) A retrospective case-control study of the use of hormone-related supplements and association with breast cancer. Int J Cancer 120(7):1523–1528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Newton KM, Reed SD, LaCroix AZ, Grothaus LC, Ehrlich K, Guiltinan J (2006) Treatment of vasomotor symptoms of menopause with black cohosh, multibotanicals, soy, hormone therapy, or placebo: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 145(12):869–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McTiernan A, Rajan KB, Tworoger SS et al (2003) Adiposity and sex hormones in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 21(10):1961–1966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie H, Ballard-Barbash R (2000) Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Arch Intern Med 160(7):953–958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wayne SJ, Neuhouser ML, Koprowski C et al (2009) Breast cancer survivors who use estrogenic botanical supplements have lower serum estrogen levels than non users. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(1):111–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma H, Sullivan-Halley J, Smith AW et al (2011) Estrogenic botanical supplements, health-related quality of life, fatigue, and hormone-related symptoms in breast cancer survivors: a HEAL study report. BMC Complement Altern Med 11:109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruendwald J, Brendler T, Jaenicke C (2007) Physician’s desk reference for herbal products, 4th edn. Thompson Healthcare, Montvale

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cassileth BRLC (2003) Herb-drug interactions in oncology. BC Decker I, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Natural medicine comprehensive database (2007). www.naturaldatabase.com Accessed 11 Jun 2006

  24. Harlan LC, Klabunde CN, Ambs AH et al (2009) Comorbidities, therapy, and newly diagnosed conditions for women with early stage breast cancer. J Cancer Surviv 3(2):89–98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Villasenor A, Ballard-Barbash R, Baumgartner K et al (2012) Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: the HEAL study. J Cancer Surviv 6(4):398–406

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. George SM, Irwin ML, Smith AW et al (2011) Postdiagnosis diet quality, the combination of diet quality and recreational physical activity, and prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 22(4):589–598

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenlee H, Kwan ML, Ergas IJ et al (2014) Changes in vitamin and mineral supplement use after breast cancer diagnosis in the pathways study: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 14:382

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. John GM, Hershman DL, Falci L, Shi Z, Tsai WY, Greenlee H (2016) Complementary and alternative medicine use among US cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. doi:10.1007/s11764-016-0530-y

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenlee H, Kwan ML, Ergas IJ et al (2009) Complementary and alternative therapy use before and after breast cancer diagnosis: the pathways study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(3):653–665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wyatt G, Sikorskii A, Rahbar MH, Victorson D, Adams L (2010) Intervention fidelity: aspects of complementary and alternative medicine research. Cancer Nurs 33(5):331–342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Roberts H (2010) Safety of herbal medicinal products in women with breast cancer. Maturitas 66(4):363–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Greenlee H, Balneaves LG, Carlson LE et al (2014) Clinical practice guidelines on the use of integrative therapies as supportive care in patients treated for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2014(50):346–358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (2006) Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. JAMA 295(23):2727–2741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Burstein HJ, Temin S, Anderson H et al (2014) Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol 32(21):2255–2269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chirgwin JH, Giobbie-Hurder A, Coates AS et al (2016) Treatment adherence and its impact on disease-free survival in the breast international group 1–98 trial of tamoxifen and letrozole, alone and in sequence. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.63.8619

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dai Q, Franke AA, Yu H et al (2003) Urinary phytoestrogen excretion and breast cancer risk: evaluating potential effect modifiers endogenous estrogens and anthropometrics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12(6):497–502

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Allred CD, Ju YH, Allred KF, Chang J, Helferich WG (2001) Dietary genistin stimulates growth of estrogen-dependent breast cancer tumors similar to that observed with genistein. Carcinogenesis 22(10):1667–1673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ju YH, Doerge DR, Allred KF, Allred CD, Helferich WG (2002) Dietary genistein negates the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells implanted in athymic mice. Cancer Res 62(9):2474–2477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Greenlee H, Neugut AI, Falci L et al (2016) Association between complementary and alternative medicine use and breast cancer chemotherapy initiation: the Breast Cancer Quality of Care (BQUAL) study. JAMA Oncol 2(9):1170–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ma H, Carpenter CL, Sullivan-Halley J, Bernstein L (2011) The roles of herbal remedies in survival and quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors-results of a prospective study. BMC Cancer 11:222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Caan BJ, Natarajan L, Parker B et al (2011) Soy food consumption and breast cancer prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20(5):854–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shu XO, Zheng Y, Cai H et al (2009) Soy food intake and breast cancer survival. JAMA 302(22):2437–2443

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bright-Gbebry M, Makambi KH, Rohan JP et al (2011) Use of multivitamins, folic acid and herbal supplements among breast cancer survivors: the black women’s health study. BMC Complement Altern Med 11:30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Greenlee H, Kwan ML, Kushi LH et al (2012) Antioxidant supplement use after breast cancer diagnosis and mortality in the Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) cohort. Cancer 118(8):2048–2058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nechuta S, Lu W, Chen Z et al (2011) Vitamin supplement use during breast cancer treatment and survival: a prospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20(2):262–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hietala M, Henningson M, Ingvar C, Jonsson PE, Rose C, Jernstrom H (2011) Natural remedy use in a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients in southern Sweden. Acta Oncol 50(1):134–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Han E, Johnson N, DelaMelena T, Glissmeyer M, Steinbock K (2011) Alternative therapy used as primary treatment for breast cancer negatively impacts outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 18(4):912–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hathcock J (2001) Dietary supplements: how they are used and regulated. J Nutr 131(3s):1114S–1117S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The HEAL study was funded by National Cancer Institute (N01-CN-75036-20), N01-CN-05228, N01-PC-67010, National Institutes of Health M01-RR-00037), University of New Mexico NCRR M01-RR-0997, California Department of Health Services 050Q-8709-S1528.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marian L. Neuhouser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human participants

The HEAL study complied with all federal regulations for human subjects research.

Informed consent

All participating institutions have approved and on-going IRB files and all participants signed written informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neuhouser, M.L., Smith, A.W., George, S.M. et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine and breast cancer survival in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 160, 539–546 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4010-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4010-x

Keywords

Navigation