Abstract
While we understand a great deal on the impacts of introduced generalist pollinators on the native ecosystems, very little is known about the impacts of naturalized specialist pollinators. The oil-collecting bee Centris nitida, which has recently naturalized in southern Florida, has been identified as a novel participant in an endemic specialized mutualism between Byrsonima lucida, a threatened native oil plant, and Centris errans, its sole native pollinator. In this study, we determined the impacts of this novel pollinator on B. lucida by assessing the degree of its pollen limitations in sites with and without the introduced oil bee, as well as in natural and garden settings. We also compared the key processes of pollination for both of the Centris bee species. The degrees of pollen limitation sustained by B. lucida were similar among sites with or without the introduced oil bee, and among natural or garden sites. The native oil bee’s visitation rates (no. of visits/minute/flower) to B. lucida plants were not significantly reduced at sites where the introduced oil bees were present. The native oil bee had a lower foraging rate (no. of flowers visited/minute) and was a less efficient pollinator than the introduced oil bee. There has been no observed negative impact to either the native oil plant or bee, the introduced bee is absent in most natural areas, and it is also possible that the bee may arrive naturally given the trend in global warming. In light of these facts, we do not recommend any management action towards this introduced oil bee.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, Morgan MT, Wilson WG (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85:2408–2421
Barthell JF, Randall JM, Thorp RW, Wenner AM (2001) Promotion of seed set in yellow star-thistle by honey bees: evidence of an invasive mutualism. Ecol Appl 11:1870–1883
Buchmann SL (1987) The ecology of oil flowers and their bees. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:343–369
Burd M (1994) A probabilistic analysis of pollinator behavior and weed production in Lobelia Deckenii. Ecology 75:1635–1646
Butz Huryn VM (1997) Ecological impacts of introduced honey bees. Q Rev Biol 72:275–297
Dafni A (1992) Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Institute of Evolution Haifa University. Oxford University Press, New York
Dafni A, Shmida A (1996) The possible ecological implications of the invasion of Bombus terrestris (L.) (Apidae) at Mt. Carmel, Isreal. In: Matheson AC, Buchmann SL, O’Toole C (eds) The conservation of bees. The Linnean Society of London and the International Bee Research Association, London, pp 183–200
Donovan BJ (1990) Interactions between native and introduced bees in New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 3:104–117
Downing J (2011) Impacts of the naturalized bee Centris nitida on a specialized native mutualism in Southern Florida. Thesis, Florida International University
Frankie GW, Vinson SB, Newstrom E, Barthell JF (1988) Nest site and habitat preferences of Centris bees in the Costa Rican Dry Forest. Biotropica 20:301–310
Gardner RO, Early JW (1996) The naturalisation of banyan figs (Ficus spp., Moraceae) and their pollinating wasps (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae) in New Zealand. NZ J Bot 34(1): 103–110
Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:1–26
Groom MJ (1998) Allee effects limit population of an annual plant. Am Nat 151:487–496
Gross CL, Mackay D (1998) Honeybees reduce fitness of pioneer shrub Melastoma affine (Melastomataceae). Biol Conserv 86:169–178
Hingston ABM, McQuillan PB (1999) Displacement of Tasmanian native megachilid bees by the recently introduced bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Hymenoptera : Apidae). Aust J Zool 47:59
Horskins K, Turner VB (1999) Resource foraging patterns of honeybees, Apis mellifera, and native insects on flowers of Eccalyptus costata. Aust J Ecol 24:2221–2227
Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112
Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston JO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman TL (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Ecology 36:467–497
Koptur S (2006) The conservation of specialized and generalized pollination systems in subtropical ecosystems: a case study. In: Ollerton J, Waser NM (eds) Plant-pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 341–361
Liu H, Pemberton RW (2009) Solitary invasive orchid bee outperforms co-occurring native bees to promote fruit set of an invasive Solanum. Oecologia 159:515–525
Liu H, Pemberton RW, Stiling P (2006) Native and introduced pollinators promote a self-incompatible invasive woody vine (Paederia foetida L) in Florida. J Torrey Bot Soc 133:304–311
Lodge TE, Ebrary I (2005) The Everglades handbook: understanding the ecosystem. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Long RK, Lakela O (1971) A floral of Tropical Florida. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables
McDade LA, Kinsman S (1980) The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. Evolution 34:944–958
Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Myers RL, Ewel JJ (1990) Ecosystems of Florida. The University of Central Florida Press, Gainsville, pp 230–271
Olmstead AL, Wooten DB (1987) Bee pollination and productivity growth: the case of Alfalfa. Am J Agric Econ 69:56–63
Olson DM, Dinerstein E (2002) The global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 89:199–224
Paini D, Roberts DR (2005) Commercial honey bees reduce the fecundity of an Australian native bee. Biol Conserv 123:103–112
Pascarella JB, Waddington KD, Neal PR (1999) The bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of Everglades National Park Florida and adjacent areas: distribution, phenology, and biogeography. J Kans Entomol Soc 72:32–45
Paton DC (1990) Budgets for the use of floral resources in malee heath. In: Noble JC, Joss PJ, Jones GK (eds) The Malee lands: a conservation perspective. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 189–193
Paton DC (1996) Overview of feral and managed honeybees in Australia: distribution, abundance, extent of interactions with native biota, evidence of future impacts and research. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canaberra
Pemberton RW, Liu H (2008a) Potential of invasive and native solitary specialist bee pollinators to help restore the rare cowhorn orchid (Cyrtopodium punctatum) in Florida. Biol Conserv 141:1758–1764
Pemberton RW, Liu H (2008b) Naturalization of the Oil Collecting Bee Centris nitida (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Centrini), a potential pollinator of selected native, ornamental, and invasive plants in Florida. Fla Entomol 91:101–109
Pemberton RW, Liu H (2008c) Naturalized orchid bee pollinates resin-reward flowers in Florida: novel and known mutualisms. Biotropica 40:714–718
Ramsey MW (1988) Differences in pollinator effectiveness of birds and insects visiting Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae). Oecologia 76:119
Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Reimanek M (2000) Plant invasions—the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:65–93
Roubik DW (1996) Measuring the meaning of honey bees. In: Matheson AC, Buchmann SL, O’Toole C (eds) The conservation of bees. The Linnean Society of London and the International Bee Research Association, London, pp 163–172
Roubik DW (2002) The value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature 417:708
Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2011) The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conserv Biol 25:428–437
Snelling RR (1984) Studies on the taxonomy and distribution of American centridine bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Studies on the taxonomy and distribution of American centridine bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Contributions Sci (Los Angeles) 347:1–69
Stout JC, Kells AR, Goulson D (2002) Pollination of the invasive exotic shrub Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae) by introduced bees in Tasmania. Biol Conserv 106:425–434
Walther G, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT, Pysek P, Kuehn I, Zobel M et al (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24:686–693
Weaver RE, Anderson PJ (2010) Notes on Florida’s endangered and threatened plants, 5th edn. Buerau of Entomology, Nematology, and Plant Pathology-Botany Section. Contribution No. 38
Wunderlin RP (1982) Guide to the vascular plants of Central Florida. University of South Florida Press, Tampa
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Suzanne Koptur for her advice to the project. Jennifer Possley is thanked for her kind help with the map. Special thanks to Daniel Alfonso, Cara Cooper, Andrew Gonzalez, David Herbella, Wuying Lin, Oliver Ljustina, Derick Rogers for their help with the fieldwork. Thanks to Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, and Montgomery Botanical Center for access to the amazing collections and support during the study. Comments from two anonymous reviewers improved previous version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Downing, J.L., Liu, H. Friend or foe? Impacts of the introduced tropical oil bee Centris nitida on a threatened and specialized native mutualism in Southern Florida. Biol Invasions 14, 2175–2185 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0223-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0223-z