Abstract
The methodology of Support Vector Machine Methods is adapted in a straightforward manner to enable the analysis of stratified outcomes such as horseracing results. As the strength of the Support Vector Machine approach lies in its apparent ability to produce generalisable models when the dimensionality of the inputs is large relative to the the number of observations, such a methodology would appear to be particularly appropriate in the horseracing context, where often the number of input variables deemed as being potentially relevant can be difficult to reconcile with the scarcity of relevant race results. The methods are applied to a relatively small (200 races in-sample) sample of Australian racing data and tested on 100 races out-of-sample with promising results, especially considering the relatively large number (12) of input variables used.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benter, W. (1994).“Computer Based Horserace Handicapping and Wagering Systems: A Report.” In L. Hausch and Ziemba (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 183–198.
Benter, W. (2003). “Advances in the Mathematical Modeling of Horse Race Outcomes.” 12th International Conference on Gambling and Risk-Taking, Vancouver, BC, Canada (May 2003) (Proceedings).
Bolton, R., and R.G. Chapman. (1986). “Searching for Positive Returns at the Track: A Multinomial Logit Model for Handicapping Horseraces.” Management Science, 32(8), 1040–1060.
Breiman, L. (1961).“Optimal Gambling Systems for Favorable Games.” Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics Statistics and Probability, 1, 63–68.
Edelman, D. (2000). “On the Financial Value of Information,” Annals of Operations Research, 100, 123–132.
Edelman, D. (2001). The Compleat Horseplayer. Sydney: De Mare Consultants.
Hausch, et al. (1994). In L. Hausch and Ziemba (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, Ch. 4. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kelly, J. (1956). “A New Interpretation of the Information Rate.” Bell System Technology Journal, 35, 917–926.
Maclean, L.C., W.T. Ziemba, and G. Blazenko. (1994). “Growth versus Security in Dynamic Investment Analysis.” L. Hausch and Ziemba (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 127–150.
Markowitz, H.M. (1952). “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.
Platt, J. (1998). “Sequential Minimal Optimisation: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines.” Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-98-14.
Platt, J. (1999). “Probabilistic Outputs for Support Vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods.” In A. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Schœlkopf, and D. Schuurmans (eds.), Advances in Large Margin Classifiers. MIT Press.
Scott, D. (1985). Winning More. Sydney: Horwitz/Grahame.
Sharpe, W. (1994). “The Sharpe Ratio.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49–58.
Shin, H.S. (1991). “Optimal Betting Odds Against Insider Traders.” Economic Journal, 101, 1179–1185.
Shin, H.S. (1993). “Measuring the Incidence of Insider Trading in a Market for State-Contingent Claims.” Economic Journal, 103, 1141–1153.
Vapnik, V. (2001). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edelman, D. Adapting support vector machine methods for horserace odds prediction. Ann Oper Res 151, 325–336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0131-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0131-7