Skip to main content
Log in

Community of learners: charting learning in first year graduate entry medical students during problem-based learning (PBL) study

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study considers social learning practices within and outside the overt curriculum. A thematic approach was used to analyse data from six focus group interviews with 11 graduate entry medical students from a UK university over a year of study. The results indicate that: (1) during their first year of study students form a community of learning practice, (2) this community of practice influences learning inside and outside the overt curriculum, (3) there is a changing community profile over the year of practice, (4) the students’ engagement in problem-based learning (PBL) as part of their overt curriculum strongly influences the development of a community of practice and hence learning both inside and outside the overt curriculum. Findings are discussed in terms of Wenger’s community of practice framework, the role of distributed cognition and social learning. It is concluded that PBL is an effective approach for academics to enrich students’ social learning practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, M. (2000). Problem-based learning: Why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical Education, 34, 729–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnacle, R., & Mewburn, I. (2010). Learning networks and learning: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctorial study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine, 75, 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organisation Science, 14(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durning, S. J., & Artino, A. R. (2011). Situativity theory: A perspective on how participants and the environment can interact: AMEE guide no. 52. Medical Teacher, 33, 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K., Barr, P. S., & Hargadon, A. B. (2005). Identifying situated cognition in organisation. Organization Science, 16(4), 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N. (1994). Qualitative interviewing. In N. Gilbert (Eds.), Researching social life. London: Sage.

  • Fyrenius, A., Wirell, S., & Silén, C. (2007). Student approaches to achieving understanding—Approaches to learning revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 32(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2003). Phenomenology. In J. A. Smith (Eds.), Qualitative psychology. London: Sage.

  • GMC. (2009). Tomorrows doctors. London: General Medical Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havnes, A. (2008). Peer-mediated learning beyond the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 53(2), 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imafuku, R., Kataoka, R., Mayahara, M., Suzuki, H., & Saiki, T. (2014). Student’ experience in interdisciplinary problem-based learning: a discourse analysis of group interaction. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 8(2), Article 1. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1388.

  • James, M. (2008). Assessment and learning. In S. Swaffield (Eds), Unlocking assessment (pp. 20–35). London: Routledge.

  • John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). ‘Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. www.sld.demon.co.uk/resmthv.pdf.accessed.

  • Lycke, K. H. (2002). Inside PBL groups: Observation, confirmation and challenges. Education for Health, 15(30), 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K. V. (2011). Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Medical Education, 45, 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning 1—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, A. (2009). Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. Medical Principles and Practice, 18, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education, 34, 721–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyon, C. (2012). Problem-based learning; a review of the educational and psychological theory. Clinical Teacher, 9, 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Callaghan, A. (2013). Communities of practice and ways to learning: Charting the progress of biology undergraduates. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 890–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, M. F. (2003). The two faces of variation: on continuity in the phenomenographic movement (1). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powis, D., Hamilton, J., & Gordon, J. (2004). Are graduate entry programmes the answer to recruiting and selecting tomorrows doctors. Medical Education, 38, 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2003). No distribution without individuals’ cognition. In G. Salomon (Eds.), Distributed cognition (pp. 111–138). Cambridge: University Press.

  • Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundation of problem-based learning: some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27, 422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45, 792–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiers, J. A., Gibson, W. B., Kabotoff, W., Mcllwraith, D., Sculley, A., & Richard, E. (2014) Graduate nurses’ learning trajectories and experiences of problem-based learning; a foucsed ethography study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. doi:10.1016/j.ijnur-stu.2014.03.002.

  • Taylor, D., & Miflin, B. (2008). Problem-based learning: where are we now? Medical Teacher, 30, 742–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visschers-Pleijers, A. J., Dolmans, D. H., de Grave, W. S., Wolfhagen, I. H., Jacobs, J. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2006a). Students perceptions about the characteristics of an effective discussion during the reporting phase in problem-based learning. Medical Education, 40, 924–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visschers-Pleijers, A. J., Dolmans, D. H., de Leng, B. A., Wolfhagen, I. H., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2006b). Analysis of verbal interaction in tutorial groups: A process study. Medical Education, 40, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole & V. John-Steiner (Eds.), Mind in society; the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer.

  • Wimpenny, P. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The names used in this study are fictitious and are not those of the students who participated in the study. The authors would like to acknowledge Professor Alan Bleakley for critically reading the manuscript.

Ethical standard

The study was approved by the Birmingham University Ethics Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Orsmond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orsmond, P., Zvauya, R. Community of learners: charting learning in first year graduate entry medical students during problem-based learning (PBL) study. Adv in Health Sci Educ 20, 479–497 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9542-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9542-4

Keywords

Navigation