Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanized thinning of walnut plantations established on ex-arable land

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study compares two product strategies—chips versus firewood—and two technological levels—manual versus mechanized—as applied to the thinning of walnut agroforestry plantations, established on ex-arable land. Such plantations are widespread all across Europe, and their establishment was subsidized under the provisions of EU Directive 2080/90, and of regional grant schemes. Field test data were used to build a simple deterministic model for estimating thinning productivity and cost under varying work and economic conditions. This model can assist prospective users when checking the profitability of an operation, or when assessing the competitiveness of alternative options. Removing nurse alder from young walnut plantations yields between 25 and 50 t of fresh biomass per hectare and is crucial to the good development of the stand. The study shows that the removal of nurse alder from walnut plantations is economically viable, and it can also offer some profits if stand and market conditions are favourable. As a rule, the average DBH of removal trees should not be smaller than 12 cm. Best results are obtained with mechanized harvesting, which does not seem to cause heavier stand and soil damage than manual harvesting. Manual harvesting is preferable only if the annual utilization of machinery is very low, and in this case it should be geared to firewood production. The manual whole-tree harvesting (WTH) method used in this study offers the lowest performance under all conditions, and should be replaced with some other manual alternative to WTH. Mechanized WTH offers a significant cost reduction over mechanized short-wood (SWS) harvesting, but this difference is still rather limited: hence, other parameters come into play when deciding what system to apply, and namely product price and mass output. In this respect, one also has to consider the cost of managing the harvesting residue, and that of fertilizing, if soil nutrient depletion is to be feared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adebayo A, Han H, Johnson L (2007) Productivity and cost of cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting in a mixed-conifer stand. For Prod J 57:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendfeldt E, Feldhake C, Burger J (2001) Establishing trees in an Appalachian silvopasture: response to shelters, grass control, mulch, and fertilization. Agrofor Syst 53:291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand KG (1991) Planning and analysis of forestry operation studies. Skogsarbeten Bulletin No. 17, 63 pp

  • Björheden R (2008) Optimal point of comminution in the biomass supply chain. In: Proceedings of the Nordic-Baltic conference on forest operations, Copenhagen, 23–25 September 2008. Danish Forest and Landscape, Copenhagen

  • Björheden R, Apel K, Shiba M, Thompson MA (1995) IUFRO forest work study nomenclature. Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Garpenberg, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohanek J, Groninger J (2003) Impacts of intensive management on black walnut growth and bole quality at mid-rotation. For Sci 49:522–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohanek J, Groninger J (2005) Productivity of European black alder (Alnus glutinosa) interplanted with black walnut (Juglans nigra) in Illinois, USA. Agrofor Syst 64:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chifflot V, Bertoni G, Cabanettes A, Gavaland A (2006) Beneficial effects of intercropping on the growth and nitrogen status of young wild cherry and hybrid walnut trees. Agrofor Syst 66:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogliastro A, Gagnon D, Bouchard A (1997) Experimental determination of soil characteristics optimal for the growth of ten hardwoods planted on abandoned farmland. For Ecol Manage 96:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colletti L (2001) Risultati dell’applicazione del Regolamento CEE 2080/92 in Italia. Sherwood 70:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings J, Reid N (2008) Stand-level management of plantations to improve biodiversity values. Biodivers Conserv 17:1187–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter B, Coggeshall M, Phelps J, Stokke D (2004) Impacts of forest management activities on selected hardwood wood quality attributes: a review. Wood Fiber Sci 36:84–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Scisciolo B, Leopold D, Walton D (1990) Seasonal patterns of juglone in soil beneath Juglans nigra (black walnut) and influence of J. nigra on understory vegetation. J Chem Ecol 16:1111–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupraz C (1994) Prospects for easing land tenure conflicts with agroforestry in Mediterranean France: a research approach for intercropped timber orchards. Agrofor Syst 25:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupraz C, Simorte V, Dauzat M, Bertoni G, Bernadac A, Masson P (1999) Growth and nitrogen status of young walnuts as affected by intercropped legumes in a Mediterranean climate. Agrofor Syst 43:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson E (2006) Thinning operations and their impact on biomass production in stands of Norway spruce and Scots pine. Biomass Bioenergy 30:848–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fady B, Ducci F, Aleta N, Becquey J, Diaz Vazquez R, Fernandez Lopez F, Jay-Allemand C, Lefevre F, Ninot A, Panetsos K, Paris P, Pisanelli A, Rumpf H (2003) Walnut demonstrates strong genetic variability for adaptive and wood quality traits in a network of juvenile field tests across Europe. New For 25:211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R (1978) Juglone inhibits pine growth under certain moisture regimes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:801–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich J, Dawson J (1984) Soil nitrogen concentration and Juglans nigra growth in mixed plots with nitrogen-fixing Alnus, Elaeagnus, Lespedeza and Robinia species. Can For Res 14:864–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier M, Jacobs D (2010) Ecophysiological responses of black walnut (Juglans nigra) to plantation thinning along a vertical canopy gradient. For Ecol Manage 259:867–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold M, Hanover J (1987) Agroforestry systems for the temperate zones. Agrofor Syst 5:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg T (1995) Evaluating operator-machine interactions in comparative time studies. Int J For Eng 7:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman P (1995) Siwork 3: User Guide. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Vejle, 37 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman P, Kent T (2007) Harvesting and processing forest biomass for energy production in Ireland. In: The ForestEnergy 2006 programme. COFORD, Dublin, p 68. ISBN-1-902696-56-5

  • Laitila J, Asikainen A (2006) Energy wood logging from early thinnings by harwarder method. Baltic For 12:94–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitila J, Kärhä K, Jylhä P (2009) Time consumption models and parameters for off- and on-road transportation of whole-tree bundles. Baltic For 15:105–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhler J, Kerley M, Garrett H, Cutter B, McGraw R (1999) Comparison of continuous and rotational silvopastoral systems for established walnut plantations in southwest Missouri, USA. Agrofor Syst 44:267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limbeck-Lilienau B (2003) Residual stand damage caused by mechanized harvesting systems. In: Limbeck-Lilienau, Steinmüller, Stampfer (eds) Proceedings of the Austro2003 meeting: High Tech Forest Operations for Mountainous Terrain, Schlaegl, Austria, October 5–9, 2003, p 11. CD ROM

  • Mary F, Dupraz C, Delannoy E, Liagre F (1999) Incorporating agroforestry practices in the management of walnut plantations in Dauphiné, France: an analysis of farmers’ motivations. Agrofor Syst 43:243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead D (2005) Opportunities for improving plantation productivity. How much? How quickly? How realistic? Biomass Bioenergy 28:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minotta G (2002) Gli impianti di latifoglie pregiate: una risorsa da valorizzare. Monti e Boschi 2:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyata ES (1980) Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. General Technical Report NC-55. Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, 14 pp

  • Nord-Larsen T (2002) Stand and site productivity response following whole-tree harvesting in early thinnings of Norway spruce. Biomass Bioenergy 23:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen E, Hossain M, Miller M (1998) Statistical comparison of methods used in harvesting work studies, Research Contribution No. 23. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 31 pp

  • Paris P, Olimpieri G, Todaro L, Cannata F (1998) Leaf-water potential and soil-moisture depletion of walnut mulched with polyethylene and intercropped with alfalfa in central Italy. Agrofor Syst 40:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder F (1998) Fertilizer combinations benefit diameter growth of plantation black walnut. J Plant Nutr 21:1329–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld W, Schlesinger R, Kessler K (1983) Allelopathic effects of black walnut on European black alder coplanted as a nurse species. J Chem Ecol 9:1119–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999) StatView Reference. SAS Publishing, Cary, NC, pp 84–93. ISBN-1-58025-162-5

  • Schlesinger R, Williams R (1984) Growth response of black walnut to interplanted trees. For Ecol Manage 9:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider U, McCarl B (2003) Economic potential of biomass based fuels for greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Environ Resour Econ 24:291–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (1973) Work measurement: observed time to standard time. In: Wittering W (ed) Work study in forestry. Forestry Commission Bulletin No. 47, pp 26–39

  • Scott R, Sullivan W (2003) A review of suitable companion crops for black walnut. Agrofor Syst 71:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Siardi E, Alberti G (2005) Imboschimenti realizzati con il PSR. Sherwood No. 117, pp 39–44

  • Spinelli R, Hartsough B (2001) A survey of Italian chipping operations. Biomass Bioenergy 21:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Magagnotti N (2010) Performance and cost of a new mini-forwarder for use in thinning operations. J For Res. doi:10.1007/s10310-010-0193-x

  • Spinelli R, Visser R (2008) Analyzing and estimating delays in harvester operations. Int J For Eng 19:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Visser R (2009) Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. Biomass Bioenergy 33:429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Nati C, Magagnotti N (2006) Biomass harvesting from buffer strips in Italy: three options compared. Agrofor Syst 68:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Nati C, Magagnotti N (2009) Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations. Biomass Bioenergy 33:817–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot B, Suadicani K (2005) Analysis of two simulated in-field chipping and extraction systems in spruce thinnings. Biosyst Eng 91:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velge F, Harrison S (2009) Financing methods for small-scale hardwood plantations in Queensland, Australia. Small-Scale For 8:411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venn T (2005) Financial and economic performance of long-rotation hardwood plantation investments in Queensland, Australia. For Policy Econ 7:437–454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to thank the Provincial Administration of Vicenza (field support), the municipality of Montecchio Precalcino (field support), Veneto Agricoltura (project funding), the Lombardy Region (project funding) and Agriteam (project coordination).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNR IVALSA, Via Biasi 75, 38010, San Michele all’Adige, TN, Italy

    Natascia Magagnotti & Gianni Picchi

  2. CNR IVALSA, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy

    Carla Nati & Raffaele Spinelli

Authors
  1. Natascia Magagnotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carla Nati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gianni Picchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raffaele Spinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaele Spinelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magagnotti, N., Nati, C., Picchi, G. et al. Mechanized thinning of walnut plantations established on ex-arable land. Agroforest Syst 82, 77–86 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9348-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9348-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation