Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A bioeconomic analysis of carbon sequestration in farm forestry: a simulation study of Gliricidia sepium

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trees provide many environmental services including improved soil fertility and soil structure, which often leads to increased productivity and sustainability of the land. Trees also increase the average carbon stocks of land-use systems. Under the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol, landholders may receive payments for the carbon-sequestration services provided. This study is the first of a series aimed at assessing the appropriateness of tree-based land-use systems as alternatives to continuous cropping and/or Imperata-fallow systems. The performance of a Gliricidia sepium woodlot, grown over 25 years and under various pruning and harvesting regimes, was assessed through modelling. The assessment was based on the system’s ability to sequester and store carbon, maintain land productivity, and be financially profitable for landholders. It was found that the system was profitable under most management regimes tested. Profits were maximised by pruning and harvesting as much biomass as possible when no carbon payments were available, but this strategy decreased system productivity and profitability in the long run. Carbon-sequestration payments encouraged landholders to adopt less intensive practices since net revenues were higher with carbon payments. It was also shown that the carbon pools included in a carbon-trading scheme were sensitive to carbon-measuring costs. For example, if the annual cost of measuring soil carbon was greater than US$1.19 ha−1 it would not be economical to account for this pool in a carbon-sequestration project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Boer (2001) ArticleTitleEconomic assessment of mitigation options for enhancing and maintaining carbon sink capacity in Indonesia Mitigat. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 6 257–290

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bohlin F. and Hektor B. 1998. Twice carbon dioxide – biofuels help pay the bill. In: Berger A. (eds), Twice Humanity: Implications for Local and Global Resource Use. Nordic Africa Institute: Forum for Development Studies, pp. 333–338.

  3. O.J. Cacho R.L. Hean R.M. Wise (2003a) ArticleTitleCarbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 47 IssueID2 153–179

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cacho O.J., Wise R.M. and MacDicken K.G. 2003b. Carbon monitoring costs and their effect on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry. Mitigat. Adapt. Strat. Global Change (Articles in AdvancePrepublication Date: 11/03/2003).

  5. H. de Foresta G. Michon (1997) ArticleTitleThe agroforest alternative to Imperata grasslands: when smallholder agriculture and forestry reach sustainability Agroforest. Syst. 36 105–120

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Delaney K. Hairiah P. Purnomosidhi J.M. Roshetko (2002) ArticleTitleCarbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: can smallholder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage? Am. J. Alternat. Agric. 17 IssueID3 138–148

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.M. Fagi (1992) Upland crop production in Indonesia with regard to fertilizer utilization Sukamandi Research Institute for food crops. Agency for Agriculture Research and Development Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.P. Garrity M. Soekardi M. van Noordwijk R. de la Cruz P.S. Pathak H.P.M. Gunasena N. Van so G. Huijun N.M. Majid (1997) ArticleTitleThe Imperata grasslands of tropical Asia: areadistribution, and typology Agroforest. Syst. 36 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ginoga K. 2001. Center for Socio Economic Research on Forestry (CESERF), personal communication.

  10. M.M. Gowen W.R. Bentley E. Stijfhoorn (1994) Tropical forest management and wood-based biomass energy as development assets W.R. Bentley M.M. Gowen (Eds) Forest Resources and Wood-based Biomass Energy as Rural Development Assets Science Publishers, Inc Lebanon, NH 27–63

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grist P., Menz K., Amarasinghe A. and K. 1999a. Private and social benefits from the use of clonal rubber. In: Menz K., Magcale-Macandog D. and Wayan Rusastra I. (eds), Imperata Areas of Southeast Asia: Alternatives to Shifting Cultivation. ACIAR Monograph No. 52, pp. 251–258.

  12. Grist P., Menz K. and Nelson R. 1999b. Gliricidia as Improved Fallow. In: Menz K., Magcale-Macandog D. and Wayan Rusastra I. (eds), Improving Smallholder Farming Systems in Imperata Areas of Southeast Asia: Alternatives to Shifting Cultivation. ACIAR Monograph No. 52, pp. 133–147.

  13. Grist P., Menz K. and Thomas. 1999c. Rubber: Indonesia. In: Menz K., Magcale-Macandog D. and Wayan Rusastra I. (eds), Improving Smallholder Farming Systems in Imperata Areas of Southeast Asia: Alternatives to Shifting Cultivation. ACIAR Monograph No. 52, pp. 161–171.

  14. K. Hairiah M. van Noordwijk B. Santoso M.S. Syekhfani (1992) ArticleTitleBiomass production and root distribution of eight trees and their potential for hedgerow intercropping on an Ultisol in southern Sumatra Agrivita 15 IssueID1 75–86

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Hairiah M. van Noordwijk G. Cadisch (2000a) ArticleTitleBiological N2 fixation of hedgerow trees in N. Lampung Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 48 47–59 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXosl2kur0%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Hairiah M. van Noordwijk G. Cadisch (2000b) ArticleTitleCrop yieldC and N balance of three types of cropping systems on an ultisol in Northern Lampung Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 48 3–17 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXosl2kur8%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B.T. Kang L. Reynolds A.N. Atta-Krah (1989) ArticleTitleAlley farming Adv. Agron. 43 315–359

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Kauppi R. Sedjo J. Liski (2001) Technological and economic potential of options to enhancemaintain and manage biological carbon reservoirs and geo-engineering B. Metz O. Davidson R. Swart J. Pan (Eds) Climate Change 2001, Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Cambridge University Press Cambridge 303–343

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Marland K. Fruit R. Sedjo (2001) ArticleTitleAccounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence Environ. Sci. Policy 4 IssueID6 259–268 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00038-7 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXotF2ht7w%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Menz P. Grist (1997) ArticleTitleEconomic opportunities for smallholders to combine pulpwood trees and food crops Agroforest. Syst. 36 221–232

    Google Scholar 

  21. Menz K. and Magcale-Macandog D. 1999. Introduction. In: Menz K., Magcale-Macandog D. and Wayan Rusastra I. (eds), Improving Smallholder Farming Systems in Imperata Areas of Southeast Asia: Alternatives to Shifting Cultivation. ACIAR Monograph No. 52, pp. 1–10.

  22. R.A. Nelson R.A. Cramb K.M. Menz M.A. Mamicpic (1998) ArticleTitleCost-benefit analysis of alternative forms of hedgerow intercropping in the Phillipine uplands Agroforest. Syst. 39 241–262 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005953032133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ORNL 2004. Bioenergy conversion factors. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), US Department of Energy, 2004 [cited 2004]. Available from http://bioenergy.ornl.gov/papers/ misc/energy_conv.html.

  24. C. Palm T.P. Tomich M. van Noordwijk S. Vosit J. Gockowski J. Alegre L. Verchot (2004) ArticleTitleMitigating GHG emissions in the humid tropics: case studies from the alternatives to slash-and-burn program (ASB) Environ. Develop. Sustain. 6 145–162

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Pingoud A.-L. Perala A. Pussinen (2001) ArticleTitleCarbon dynamics in wood products Mitigat. Adaptat. Strat. Global Change 6 91–111

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Sedjo G. Marland (2003) ArticleTitleInter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives Climate Policy 3 435–444 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1469-3062(03)00051-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S.M. Sitompul M.S. Syekhfani J. der Heide (1992) ArticleTitleYield of maize and soybean in a hedgerow intercropping system Agrivita 15 IssueID1 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Smith K. Mulongoy R. Persson J. Sayer (2000) ArticleTitleHarnessing carbon markets for tropical forest conservation: towards a more realistic assessment Environmental Conservation 27 IssueID3 300–311 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0376892900000345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J.L. Stewart (1996) Utilization J.L. Stewart G.E. Allison A.J. Simons (Eds) Gliricidia sepium: Genetic Resources for Farmers Oxford Forestry Institute Oxford 33–48

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tomich T.P., Kuusipalo J., Menz K. and Byron N. 1996. Imperata economics and policy. Agroforest. Syst. 36(1–3): 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tomich T.P., van Noordwijk M., Budidarsono S., Gillison A., Kusumanto T., Murdiyarso D., Stolle F. and Fagi A.M. 2001. Agricultural intensification, deforestation and the environment: assessing tradeoffs in Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Lee D.R. and Barrett C.B. (eds), Tradeoffs or Synergies? CAB International, pp. 221–244.

  32. T.P. Tomich M. van Noordwijk S.A. Vosti J. Witcover (1998) ArticleTitleAgricultural development with rainforest conservation: methods for seeking best bet alternatives to slash-and-burn, with applications to Brazil and Indonesia Agric. Econ. 19 IssueID1–2 159–174

    Google Scholar 

  33. Turvey N.D. 1994. Afforestation and Rehabilitation of Imperata Grasslands in Southeast Asia: Identification of Priorities for Research, Education, Training and Extension. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

  34. M. van Noordwijk B. Lusiana (2000) WaNuLCAS V2.0. Background on a model of WaterNutrient and Light Capture in Agroforestry Systems International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) BogorIndonesia

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. van Noordwijk B. Lusiana (2001) WaterNutrient and Light Capture in Agroforestry systems – WaNuLCAS V2.1 (Biophysical Process Model run in the Stella V7 and Microsoft Excel software environments) International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) BogorIndonesia

    Google Scholar 

  36. van Noordwijk M., Sitompul S.M., Hairiah K., Listyarini E. and Syekhfani 1995. Nitrogen supply from rotational or spatially zoned inclusion of Leguminosae for sustainable maize production on an acid soil in Indonesia. In: Date R.A. (ed.), Plant Soil Interactions at Low pH. Kluwer Academic publishers, pp. 779–784.

  37. M. van Noordwijk B. Verbist G. Vincent T.P. Tomich (2001) Simulation models that help to understand local action and its consequences for global concerns in a forest margin landscape. Paper read at: Towards Integrated Natural Resource Management in Forest Margins of the Humid Tropics: Local Action and Global Concerns ASB Lecture Note 11A BogorJava

    Google Scholar 

  38. R.T. Watson I.R. Noble B. Bolin N.H. Ravindranath D.J. Verardo D.J. Dokken (Eds) (2000) Land UseLand-use Changeand Forestry Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Whitmore A.P., Cadisch G., van Noordwijk M., Toomsan B. and Purnomosidhi P. 2000. An analysis of the economic values of novel cropping systems. In: Thailand N.E. and Sumatra S. (eds), Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 48: 105–114.

  40. A. Young (1997) Agroforestry for Soil Management CAB International Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia

    Russell Wise & Oscar Cacho

Authors
  1. Russell Wise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oscar Cacho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Cacho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wise, R., Cacho, O. A bioeconomic analysis of carbon sequestration in farm forestry: a simulation study of Gliricidia sepium . Agroforest Syst 64, 237–250 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-3938-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-3938-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation