Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vegetation structural and compositional heterogeneity as a key feature in Alpine black grouse microhabitat selection: conservation management implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

European Alpine landscapes are facing marked land-use changes. On the one hand, outdoor winter recreation is spreading, with ski infrastructure degrading fragile mountain habitats, and snowsports causing disturbance and stress to wildlife. On the other hand, the abandonment of traditional grazing practices on timberline grasslands is leading to their encroachment by shrubs and forest, which decreases habitat heterogeneity and negatively affects biodiversity. We used the black grouse, a declining key indicator species of the Alpine timberline ecosystem, to assess optimal breeding habitat characteristics, with the goal of providing guidelines for appropriate restoration. Using Mixed Effects Logistic Regression analyses, we compared habitat features both at visited and at pseudo-absence locations within individual home ranges in order to determine the optimal habitat for males and females. Horizontal and vertical structural heterogeneity within all vegetation layers was the best predictor of occurrence for both sexes. In contrast, vegetation composition affected the presence of females, but not that of males. Females preferred a diverse, complex mosaic consisting of isolated mature coniferous trees and scattered small regenerating trees, associated with shrub cover (Ericacea) and Alpine meadows (Nardion). Chick-rearing females furthermore avoided roads, forest tracks and walking paths. The optimal predicted proportions of habitat types obtained from the model provide guidelines for the restoration of timberline ecosystems through corrective forestry measures and/or adapted grazing practices. These measures are likely to also benefit other Alpine timberline biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arlettaz R (1999) Habitat selection as a major resource partitioning mechanism between the two sympatric sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. J Anim Ecol 68:460–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlettaz R, Patthey P, Baltic M, Leu T, Schaub M, Palme R, Jenni-Eiermann S (2007) Spreading free-riding snow sports represent a novel serious threat for wildlife. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1219–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollmann K, Weibel P, Graff RF (2005) An analysis of central Alpine Capercaillie spring habitat at the forest stand scale. For Ecol Manage 215:307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarero JJ, Gutiérrez E (2002) Plant species distribution across two contrasting treeline ecotones in the Spanish Pyrenees. Plant Ecol 162:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delarze R, Gonseth Y, Galland P (1999) Lebensräume der Schweiz. Ott Verlag (ed). Thun, pp 413

  • Delgado R, Sánchez-Marañón M, Martín-García JM, Aranda V, Serrano-Bernardo F, Rosúa JL (2007) Impact of ski pistes on soil properties: a case study from a mountainous area in the Mediterranean region. Soil Use Manage 23:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour A, Gadallah F, Wagner HH, Guisan A, Buttler A (2006) Plant species richness and environmental heterogeneity in a mountain landscape: effects of variability and spatial configuration. Ecography 29:573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer KC, Hill JK, Benedick S, Mustaffa N, Sherratt TN, Maryati M, Chey VK (2003) Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity. J Appl Ecol 40:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Davey S, Peace AJ, Ferris R, Harding K (2002) Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biol Conserv 107:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold P (2005) Freizeitaktivitäten im Lebensraum der Alpentiere. Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Boyce MS, Case RL, Cluff HD, Gau RJ, Gunn A, Mulders R (2005) Cumulative effects of human developments on arctic wildlife. Wildl Monogr 160:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus S, Bergmann HH, Marti C, Müller F, Vitovic OA, Wiesner J (1990) Die Birkhühner. A. Ziemsen, Lutherstadt Wittenberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner C (2000) The alpine life zone under global change. Gayana Bot 57:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurki S, Nikula A, Helle P, Lindén H (2000) Landscape fragmentation and forest composition effects on grouse breeding success in boreal forests. Ecology 81:1985–1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström J, Ranta E, Lindén M, Lindén H (1997) Reproductive output, population structure and cyclic dynamics in Capercaillie, Black Grouse and Hazel Grouse. J Avian Biol 28:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig GX, Alatalo RV, Helle P, Nissinen K, Siitari H (2008) Large-scale drainage and breeding success in boreal forest grouse. J Appl Ecol 45:325–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti C (1985) Differences in the winter ecology between cock and hen black grouse Tetrao tetrix in the Swiss Alps. Ornithol Beob 82:31–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti C, Pauli HR (1985) Wintergewicht, Masse und Altersbestimmung in einer alpinen Population des Birkhuhns Tetrao tetrix. Ornithol Beob 82:231–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer K, Weyand A, Fischer M, Stöcklin J (2006) Old cultural traditions, in addition to land use and topography, are shaping plant diversity of grasslands in the Alps. Biol Conserv 130:438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller S, Dutoit T, Alard D, Grévilliot F (1998) Restoration and rehabilitation of species-rich grassland ecosystems in France: a review. Restor Ecol 6:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pärt T (2001) The effects of territory quality on age-dependent reproductive performance in the northern wheatear, Oenanthe oenanthe. Anim Behav 62:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patthey P, Wirthner S, Signorell N, Arlettaz R (2008) Impact of outdoor winter sports on the abundance of a key indicator species of alpine ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 45:1704–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce F (1992a) Régime alimentaire du Tétras lyre Tetrao tetrix dans les Alpes françaises. Alauda 60:260–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce FMJ (1992b) Régime et sélection alimentaires des poussins de Tétras lyre (Tetrao tetrix) dans les Alpes françaises. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9:27–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce F, Magnani Y (1988) Régime alimentaire des poussins de Tétras lyre (Tetrao tetrix) sur deux zones des Alpes françaises: méthodologie et résultats préliminaires. In: Office National de la Chasse (ed) Colloque Galliformes de montagne. Paris, pp225–228

  • Reisigl H, Keller R (1999) Lebensraum Bergwald, 2nd edn. Spektrum Akademischer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolando A, Caprio E, Rinaldi E, Ellena I (2007) The impact of high-altitude ski-runs on alpine grassland bird communities. J Appl Ecol 44:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorell N, Wirthner S, Patthey P, Schranz R, Rotelli L, Arlettaz R (2010) Concealment from predators drives foraging habitat selection in brood-rearing Alpine black grouse Tetrao tetrix hens: habitat management implications. Wildl Biol 16:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sippola AL, Siitonen J, Punttila P (2002) Beetle diversity in timberline forests: a comparison between old-growth and regeneration areas in Finnish Lapland. Ann Zool Fenn 39:69–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch I (2007) Grouse. Status survey and conservation action plan 2006–2010. IUCN, the world pheasant association. Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter W, Graf RF, Hess R (2002) Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept. Conserv Biol 16:778–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasser E, Walde J, Tappeiner U, Teutsch A, Noggler W (2007) Land-use changes and natural reforestation in the Eastern Central Alps. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanska KM, Fattorini M (2000) Seed rain in high-altitude restoration plots in Switzerland. Restor Ecol 8:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ (2005) The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models. J Appl Ecol 42:720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery JA, Tallowin JR, Feber RE, Asteraki EJ, Atkinson PW, Fuller RJ, Brown VK (2001) The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food resources. J Appl Ecol 38:647–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson A, Moss R (2004) Impacts of ski-development on ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) at Cairn Gorm, Scotland. Biol Conserv 116:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P, Kastdalen L (2008) Habitat and diet of young grouse broods: resource partitioning between Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and Black Grouse (Tetrao tetrix) in boreal forests. J Ornithol 149:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP (2006) Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J Anim Ecol 75:1182–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wipf S, Rixen C, Fischer M, Schmid B, Stoeckli V (2005) Effects of ski piste preparation on alpine vegetation. J Appl Ecol 42:306–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf BO, Walsberg GE (2000) The role of the plumage in heat transfer processes of birds. Am Zool 40:575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbinden N, Salvioni M (2004) Bedeutung der Temperatur in der frühen Aufzuchtzeit für den Fortpflanzungserfolg des Birkhuhns Tetrao tetrix auf verschiedenen Höhenstufen im Tessin, Südschweiz. Ornithol Beob 101:307–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank S. Mettaz, S. Wirthner, G. Obrist, N. Reusser, F. Bancala, J. Beguin, R. Egli, U. Kormann, P. Nyffeler, P.-L. Obrist and C. Buchli for assistance in the field; G. Wittwer, J. Zbinden, M. Häusler, N. Zbinden and two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript; M. Schaub and F. Abadi Gebreselassie for providing advice on statistics. The Parco Naturale Veglia Devero, Italy, and the Naturschutzzentrum Aletsch provided free accommodation, and the ski resorts of Verbier and Les Diablerets provided free access to their facilities. A. and P. Buhayer corrected the language. This research was funded by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation to R.A. Additional funding was obtained from the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, the Cantons of Valais, Vaud and Ticino, as well as a European Interreg IIIa grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Patthey.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Patrick Patthey and Natalina Signorell contributed equally to the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1

Explanatory variables (n = 91) mapped in the field, regrouped in main categories (in bold) and sub-categories (roman numerals), with format (continuous, ordinal, categorical), function (quadratic or linear, for both continuous and ordinal variables) and levels (categorical variables, see nomenclature in the respective column; ordinal variables, 0–3, or 0–4). Variables belonging to the same sub-category are marked with vertical bars. A variable followed by brackets indicates that this variable has been eliminated in favour of the variable number given in parentheses. See text for more details (DOC 145 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patthey, P., Signorell, N., Rotelli, L. et al. Vegetation structural and compositional heterogeneity as a key feature in Alpine black grouse microhabitat selection: conservation management implications. Eur J Wildl Res 58, 59–70 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0540-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0540-z

Keywords

Navigation