Skip to main content
Log in

Functional outcome in patients with pontine infarction after acute rehabilitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the clinical features of patients with pontine infarction in the acute stage and the factors affecting functional prognosis and outcome. Lesions, neurological manifestations at initial physical status examinations, cognitive function, swallowing function and outcome [activities of daily living (ADL), status of nutritional intake at discharge and destination after discharge] were evaluated in 68 patients (47 males and 21 females) who had pontine lesions with acute phase cerebral infarction. The mean length of stay was 24.4 days. The symptoms (number of patients) observed included paralysis (50), dysarthria (47), ataxia (18), diplopia (11), dysphagia (49) and poor cognitive performance (37). The types of lesions (number of patients) included lacunar infarcts in the ventral pontine area (15), lacunar infarcts in the dorsal pontine area (13) and large lacunar infarcts (LLIs) (41). After hospital discharge, 23 patients were discharged home, 44 were transferred to another hospital and 1 died. Twenty-three patients were on a regular diet, 22 were receiving a dysphagia diet and 22 were on enteral feeding at discharge. Patients with LLIs more frequently had poor cognitive performance, paralysis, dysphagia at discharge and a tendency for a longer length of stay compared with patients who had lacunar infarct. Most patients who returned home were those who were younger in age, had fewer neurological symptoms, had better cognitive function and ADL performance, and could ingest food. In an acute hospital, age, neurological symptoms, ADL, cognitive function, and dysphagia were considered important factors for determining the outcome in patients with pontine infarction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teasell R, Foley N, Doherty T, Finestone H (2002) Clinical characteristics of patients with brainstem strokes admitted to a rehabilitation unit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1013–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sako K, Shirai W, Tokumitu N, Aizawa S (2008) Community-based study on intracerebral hemorrhage in northern Hokkaido: northern Hokkaido stroke study (NOHSS). Jpn J Stroke 30:484–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelley PJ, Stein J, Shafqat S et al (2001) Functional recovery after rehabilitation for cerebellar stroke. Stroke 32:530–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cote R, Hachinski VC, Shurvell BL et al (1986) The Canadian neurological scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke 17:731–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oguchi K, Saitoh E, Mizuno M, Baba M, Okui M, Suzuki M (1999) The repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST) as a screening test of functional dysphagia (1) normal values of RSST. Jpn J Rehabil Med 37:375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oguchi K, Saitoh E, Baba M, Kusudo S, Tanaka T, Onogi K (2000) The repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST) as a screening test of functional dysphagia (2) Validity of RSST. Jpn J Rehabil Med 38:383–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tohara H, Saitoh E, Mays K, Kuhlemeier K, Palmer JB (2003) Three tests for predicting aspiration without videofluorography. Dysphagia 18:126–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shinohara Y, Ogawa A, Suzuki N, Katayama Y, Kimura A (eds) (2009) Japanese guidelines for the management of stroke, pp 318–321

  10. Fisher CM (1991) Lacunar infarcts: a review. Cerebrovasc Dis 1:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Caplan LR (1989) Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept. Neurology 39:1246–1250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung CS, Caplan LR (2001) Pontine infarcts and hemorrhage. In: Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR (eds) Stroke syndromes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 520–533

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fazekas F, Chawluk J, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA (1987) MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. Am J Roentgenol 149:351–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM (1988) CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 16:128–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chino N, Melvin JL (eds) (1996) Functional evaluation of stroke patients. Springer, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  16. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC (1993) Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:133–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassetti C, Bogousslavsky J, Barth A, Regli F (1996) Isolated infarcts of the pons. Neurology 46:165–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumral E, Bayülkem G, Evyapan D (2002) Clinical spectrum of pontine infarction. Clinical-MRI correlations. J Neurol 249:1959–1970

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garrison SJ, Rolak LA (1993) Rehabilitation of the stroke patient. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM (eds) Rehabilitation medicine: principles and practice. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 801–824

    Google Scholar 

  20. Balaban B, Tok F, Yavuz F, Yaşar E, Alaca R (2011) Early rehabilitation outcome in patients with middle cerebral artery stroke. Neurosci Lett 498:204–207

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chua KS, Kong KH (1996) Functional outcome in brain stem stroke patients after rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:194–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher CM (1965) Lacunes: small, deep cerebral infarcts. Neurology 15:774–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher CM, Caplan LR (1971) Basilar artery branch occlusion: a cause of pontine infarction. Neurology 21:900–905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmahmann JD, Sheman JC (1998) The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain 121:561–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maeshima S, Osawa A (2007) Stroke rehabilitation in a patient with cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain Inj 21:875–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maeshima S, Osawa A, Kunishio K (2010) Cognitive dysfunction in a patient with brainstem hemorrhage. Neurol Sci 31:495–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meng NH, Wang TG, Lien IN (2000) Dysphagia in patients with brainstem stroke: incidence and outcome. Am Phys Med Rehabil 79:170–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishio D, Hirano Y, Ito S, Kurata M, Kigawa H, Osawa A, Maeshima S (2010) A study on the outcome and clinical features of stroke patients with severe disability in a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Jpn J Stroke 32:86–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Maeshima.

Appendix

Appendix

Repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST)

The RSST is an assessment of the patient’s potential to swallow saliva. The frequency of swallowing saliva is measured over a 30 s period. Fewer than three swallows in 30 s is considered abnormal [7].

Modified water swallowing test (MWST)

For the MWST, cold water (3 mL) was placed on the floor of the mouth using a 5 mL syringe; placement on the floor of the mouth prevented premature spillage into the pharynx. Patients were then instructed to swallow. If the patient was unable to swallow or experienced dyspnoea, coughing or wet-hoarse dysphonia after swallowing, a score was recorded (1 for inability to swallow, 2 for dyspnoea and 3 for cough or dysphonia), and the test was terminated. Otherwise, the patient was asked to perform two dry (saliva) swallows. If the patient was able to swallow the water but unable to perform either of the two dry swallows, a score of 4 was recorded. If the patient was able to complete the water and both dry swallows, a score of 5 was recorded. The entire procedure was repeated twice, and the final score was defined as the lowest score on any trial [8].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maeshima, S., Osawa, A., Miyazaki, Y. et al. Functional outcome in patients with pontine infarction after acute rehabilitation. Neurol Sci 33, 759–764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0812-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0812-0

Keywords

Navigation