Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of climatological observing windows and their impact on detecting daily temperature extrema

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climatological observing window (COW) is defined as a time frame over which continuous or extreme air temperature measurements are collected. A 24-h time interval, ending at 00UTC or shifted to end at 06UTC, has been associated with difficulties in characterizing daily temperature extrema. A fixed 24-h COW used to obtain the temperature minima leads to potential misidentification due to fragmentation of “nighttime” into two subsequent nighttime periods due to the time discretization interval. The correct identification of air temperature extrema is achievable using a COW that identifies daily minimum over a single nighttime period and maximum over a single daytime period, as determined by sunrise and sunset. Due to a common absence of hourly air temperature observations, the accuracy of the mean temperature estimation is dependent on the accuracy of determination of diurnal air temperature extrema. Qualitative and quantitative criteria were used to examine the impact of the COW on detecting daily air temperature extrema. The timing of the 24-h observing window occasionally affects the determination of daily extrema through a mischaracterization of the diurnal minima and by extension can lead to errors in determining daily mean temperature. Hourly air temperature data for the time period from year 1987 to 2014, obtained from Toronto Buttonville Municipal Airport weather station, were used in analysis of COW impacts on detection of daily temperature extrema and calculation of annual temperature averages based on such extrema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This period ends at the time of subsequent sunrise plus 1 h, to account for thermal inertia of the atmosphere.

  2. Solar declination varies from −23° 26′ (northern hemisphere summer) to +23° 26′ (northern hemisphere winter).

References

  • Bonacci O, Zeljkovic I, Sakic Trogrlic R, Milkovic J (2013) Differences between true mean daily, monthly and annual air temperatures calculated with three equations: a case study from three Croatian stations. Theor Appl Climatol 114:271–279. doi:10.1007/s00704-012-0830-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collison P, Tabony RC (1984) The estimation of mean temperature from daily maxima and minima. Meteorological Magazine, London 113:329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough WA, He D (2015) Diurnal temperature asymmetries and fog at Churchill, Manitoba. Theor Appl Climatol 121:113–119. doi:10.1007/s00704-014-1227-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris SA, Pedersen JH (1995) Comparison of three methods of calculating air temperature from electronic measurements. Z Geomorph 39:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell FZ (1919) Comparison of methods for computing daily mean temperatures: effect of discrepancies upon investigations of climatologists and biologists. Mon Weather Rev 47:799–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicosky DC, Winkelman LJ, Baker JM, Baker DG (1989) Accuracy of hourly air temperatures calculated from daily minima and maxima. Agric For Meteorol 46:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trewin B (2004) Effects of changes in algorithms used for the calculation of Australian mean temperature. Aust Meteorol Mag 53:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent LA, Xiolan LW, Milewska EJ, Hopkinson R, Malone R (2009) Bias in minimum temperature introduced by a redefinition of the climatological day at the Canadian stations. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:2160–2168. doi:10.1175/2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent LA, Xiolan LW, Milewska EJ, Wan H, Yang F, Swail V (2012) A second generation of homogenized Canadian monthly surface air temperature for climate trend analysis. J Geo Research 117:D18110. doi:10.1029/2012JD017859

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber RO (1993) Influence of different daily mean formulas on monthly and annual averages on temperature. Theor Appl Climatol 47:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss A, Hays CJ (2005) Calculating daily mean temperatures by different methods: implications from a non-linear algorithm. Agric For Meteorol 128:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X, Wang A (2012) What is monthly mean land surface temperature? Eos 93(15):156–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Scarborough, Ontario, M1C1A4, Canada

    Ana Žaknić-Ćatović & William A. Gough

Authors
  1. Ana Žaknić-Ćatović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William A. Gough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Žaknić-Ćatović.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Žaknić-Ćatović, A., Gough, W.A. A comparison of climatological observing windows and their impact on detecting daily temperature extrema. Theor Appl Climatol 132, 41–54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2068-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2068-y

Search

Navigation