Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fracture dislocations of the cervical spine: a review of 106 conservatively and operatively treated patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We compared clinical outcomes following conservative treatment of subaxial fracture dislocations of the cervical spine and posterior fusion using bone grafts and interspinous Roger’s wiring (Bohlman modification). We reviewed 106 patients: 51 were treated primarily surgically, and 55 treated conservatively served as historical controls. Those patients who neurologically recovered at least one Frankel grade had on average less displacement on discharge (1.3 mm vs 3.1 mm, p=0.04). Although anatomical outcomes were better in the operatively treated group (1.6 mm vs 2.9 mm displacement at end of follow-up, p=0.001), there was no difference in neurological recovery. Late neck pain correlated with residual displacement (p=0.04) and was more common in the conservatively treated patients (p=0.01). Time in hospital was shorter in the group with posterior fusions, and complication rates were similar to those found after conservative treatment. A significant number of the conservatively treated patients developed kyphotic deformity, and 29% needed later surgery because of chronic instability or unacceptable anatomical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–D
Fig. 2A, B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allred CD, Sledge JB (2001) Irreducible dislocations of the cervical spine with a prolapsed disc. Preliminary results from a treatment technique. Spine 26:1927–1930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beyer CA, Cabanela ME (1992) Unilateral facet dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine: A review. Orthopedics 15:311–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beyer CA, Cabanela ME, Berquist TH (1991) Unilateral facet dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73B:977–981

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bohlman HH (1979) Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61A:1119–1142

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF Jr, Holford TR, Baskin DS, Eisenberg HS, Flamm E, Leo-Summers L, Maroon JC, Marshall LF et al (1992) Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow-up data. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurosurg 76:23–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang DG, Tencer AF, Ching RP, Treece B, Senft D, Anderson PA (1994) Geometric changes in the cervical spinal canal during impact. Spine 19:973–980

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eismont FJ, Arena MJ, Green BA (1991) Extrusion of an intervertebral disc associated with traumatic subluxation or dislocation of the cervical facets. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73A:1555–1560

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fehlings MG, Sekhon LHS, Tator C (2001) The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury. Spine 26:S101–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, Vernon JD, Walsh JJ (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 7:179–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grant GA, Mirza SK, Chapman JR, Winn HR, Newell DW, Jones DT, Grady MS (1999) Risk of early closed reduction in cervical spine subluxation injuries. J Neurosurg 90 [Suppl 1]:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guha A, Tator CH, Endrenyi L, Piper I (1987) Decompression of the spinal cord improves recovery after acute experimental spinal cord compression injury. Paraplegia 25:324–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadley MN, Fitzpatrick BC, Sonntag VKH, Browner CM (1992) Facet fracture-dislocation injuries of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 30:661–666

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hart RA, Vaccaro AR, Nachwalter RS (2002) Controversies in spine—cervical facet dislocation. When is magnetic resonance imaging indicated? Spine 27:116–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrington JF, Likavec MJ, Smith AS (1991) Disc herniation in cervical fracture subluxation. Neurosurgery 29:374–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hisanori M, Cheng BC, David SM, Ohnari K, Zdeblick TA (2001) Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation. Spine 26:1662–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee AS, MacLean JCB, Newton DA (1994) Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76B:352–356

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nockels RP (2001) Nonoperative management of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 26:S31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pettersson K, Toolanen G (1998) High-dose methylprednisolone prevents extensive sick leave after whiplash injury. A prospective, randomized double-blind study. Spine 23:984–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Short DJ, El Masry WS, Jones PW (2000) High dose methylprednisolone in the management of acute spinal cord injury—a systematic review from a clinical perspective. Spinal Cord 38:273–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Flanders AE, Balderston RA, Northrup BE, Cotler JM (1999) Magnetic resonance evaluation of the intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments, and spinal cord before and after closed traction reduction of cervical spine dislocations. Spine 24:1210–1217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaccaro AR, Madigan L, Schweitzer ME, Flanders AE, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of soft-tissue disruption after flexion-distraction injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. Spine 26:1866–1872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO (1975) Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 109:85–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mika P. Koivikko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koivikko, M.P., Myllynen, P. & Santavirta, S. Fracture dislocations of the cervical spine: a review of 106 conservatively and operatively treated patients. Eur Spine J 13, 610–616 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0688-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0688-2

Keywords

Navigation