Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geometric morphometric methods for three-dimensional virtual reconstruction of a fragmented cranium: the case of Angelo Poliziano

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The process of forensic identification of missing individuals is frequently reliant on the superimposition of cranial remains onto an individual's picture and/or facial reconstruction. In the latter, the integrity of the skull or a cranium is an important factor in successful identification. Here, we recommend the usage of computerized virtual reconstruction and geometric morphometrics for the purposes of individual reconstruction and identification in forensics. We apply these methods to reconstruct a complete cranium from facial remains that allegedly belong to the famous Italian humanist of the fifteenth century, Angelo Poliziano (1454–1494). Raw data was obtained by computed tomography scans of the Poliziano face and a complete reference skull of a 37-year-old Italian male. Given that the amount of distortion of the facial remains is unknown, two reconstructions are proposed: The first calculates the average shape between the original and its reflection, and the second discards the less preserved left side of the cranium under the assumption that there is no deformation on the right. Both reconstructions perform well in the superimposition with the original preserved facial surface in a virtual environment. The reconstruction by means of averaging between the original and reflection yielded better results during the superimposition with portraits of Poliziano. We argue that the combination of computerized virtual reconstruction and geometric morphometric methods offers a number of advantages over traditional plastic reconstruction, among which are speed, reproducibility, easiness of manipulation when superimposing with pictures in virtual environment, and assumptions control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Işcan MY, Solla HE, McCabe BQ (2005) Victim of a dictatorial regime: identification of Mr. Roberto Gomensoro Josman. Forensic Sci Int 151:213–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferenbach D, Schwidetzky I, Stloukal M (1980) Recommendations for age and sex diagnosis of skeletons. J Hum Evol 9:517–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Angelis D, Cattaneo C, Grandi M (2007) Dental superimposition: a pilot study for standardising the method. Int J Legal Med 121:501–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Işcan MY, Helmer RP (1993) Forensic analysis of the skull: craniofacial analysis, reconstruction and identification. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshino M, Matsuda H, Kubota S, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S, Seta S (1997) Computer-assisted skull identification system using video superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 90:231–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh AK, Sinha P (2001) An economised craniofacial identification system. Forensic Sci Int 117:109–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Solla HE, Işcan MY (2001) Skeletal remains of Dr. Eugenio Antonio Berrios Sagredo. Forensic Sci Int 116:201–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenton TW, Heard AN, Sauer NJ (2008) Skull–photo superimposition and border deaths: identification through exclusion and the failure to exclude. J Forensic Sci 53:34–40. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00624.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prag J, Neave R (1997) Making faces. British Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor KT (2001) Forensic art and illustration. CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilkinson C (2004) Forensic facial reconstruction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson C, Neave R (2003) The reconstruction of a face showing a healed wound. J Arch Sci 30:1343–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quatrehomme G, Balaguer T, Staccini P, Alunni-Perret V (2007) Assessment of the accuracy of three-dimensional manual craniofacial reconstruction: a series of 25 controlled cases. Int J Legal Med 121:469–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Claes P, Vandermeulen D, De Greef S, Willems G, Suetens P (2006) Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation. Forensic Sci Int 159:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vandermeulen D, Claes P, Loeckx D, De Greef S, Willems G, Suetens P (2006) Computerized craniofacial reconstruction using CT-derived implicit surface representations. Forensic Sci Int 159:164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee K (1999) Principles of CAD CAM CAE systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petronilli S (2002) Prototipazione rapida, ingegneria inversa, beni culturali. Innovare 2:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL, Weber GW (2004) Computer aided reconstruction of incomplete human crania using statistical and geometrical estimation methods. Enter the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, BAR International Series 1227. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 92–94

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Persiani F, Benazzi S, Gruppioni G (2006) Computer assisted archaeo-anthropology on damaged mummified remains. Project papers from the joint event CIPA/VAST/EG/EuroMed 2006: The evolution of Information Communication Technology in Cultural Heritage, pp 112–118

  20. Benazzi S, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Mallegni G, Mallegni F, Persiani F, Gruppioni G (2008) The face of the poet Dante Alighieri reconstructed by virtual modelling and forensic anthropology techniques. J Archaeol Sci 36:278–283. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eckardt A, Swennen GR (2005) Virtual planning of composite mandibular reconstruction with free fibula bone graft. J Craniofac Surg 16:1137–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mann F, Gatinel D, Morax S, Hoang-Xuan T (2006) Three-dimensional computer-assisted modeling of the orbital cavity and the eyelids. J Fr Ophtalmol 29:381–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Poukens J, Haex J, Riediger D (2003) The use of rapid prototyping in the preoperative planning of distraction osteogenesis of the cranio-maxillofacial skeleton. Comput Aided Surg 8:146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Bassi M, Gori R, Lamberti C, Sarti A (2006) Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillo-facial virtual surgery (VISU). J Craniofac Surg 17:661–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de Leon MS, Martin RD, Stucki P (1995) Neanderthal computer skulls. Nature 375:283–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ponce de León MS, Zollikofer CPE (1999) New evidence from Le Moustier 1: computer-assisted reconstruction and morphometry of the skull. Anat Rec 254:474–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Neubauer S, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Weber GW (2004) Geometric reconstruction of the MLD 37/38 endocranium. Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 38:152

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS, Lieberman DE et al (2005) Virtual cranial reconstruction of Sahelanthropus tchadensis. Nature 434:755–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogihara N, Nakatsukasa M, Nakano Y, Ishida H (2006) Computerized restoration of nonhomogeneous deformation of a fossil cranium based on bilateral symmetry. Am J Phys Anthropol 130:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Frassetto F (1933) Dantis ossa. La forma corporea di Dante, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pearson K, Morant GM (1934) The Wilkinson head of Oliver Cromwell and its relationship to busts, masks and painted portraits. Biometrika 1934(26):1–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fabroni A (1800) “Elogj di Dante Alighieri, di Angelo Poliziano, di Lodovico Ariosto, e di Torquato Tasso”. Stamperia Reale, Pre-1801 Imprint Collection (Library of Congress), pp 142–143

  33. Cantù C (1865) “Storia della letteratura italiana”. F. Le Monnier, p 140

  34. Andreolli B (1994) Ioannis Pici Mirandulae viri omni disciplinarum genere consumatissimi vita per Ioannem Franciscum illustris principis galeotti Pici filium conscripta. Aedes Muratoriana, Modena

    Google Scholar 

  35. Giovio P, Caruso C (1999) Ritratti degli uomini illustri. Sellerio, Palermo, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gunz P (2005) Statistical and geometric reconstruction of hominid crania: reconstructing australopithecine ontogeny. PhD Thesis. Ph.D. Dissertation

  37. Gawlikowska SA (2006) Radiological and anthropometric analysis of the symmetry and direction of evolution of skulls from some historic populations. Ann Acad Med Stetin 52:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gawlikowska A, Szczurowski J, Czerwiński F, Miklaszewska D, Adamiec E, Dzieciołowska E (2007) The fluctuating asymmetry of medieval and modern human skulls. Homo 58:159–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Deleon VB (2007) Fluctuating asymmetry and stress in a medieval Nubian population. Am J Phys Anthropol 132:520–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL (2005) Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In: Slice DE (ed) Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. Kluwer Academic, New York, pp 73–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mardia KV, Bookstein FL, Moreton IJ (2000) Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika 87:285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dryden IL, Mardia KV (1998) Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  44. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-d shapes. PAMI 14:239–256

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang ZY (1994) Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces. Int J Comput Vision 13:119–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ubelaker DH, Bubniak E, O'Donnell G (1992) Computer-assisted photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 37:750–762

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Philipp Gunz for providing the formulae that he developed in order to reconstruct missing data in Mathematica. We wish to express our thanks to the staff of the Radiology Department of Ravenna Hospital (Ravenna, Italy) and Clinica Pinna Pintor (Turin, Italy), in particular to Dr Gino Carnazza, for support in this project on the technical aspects of CT scanning. Thanks to Prof. Giacomo Giacobini for help in the choice of the reference skull. Many thanks to Stephanie Kozakowski for copy editing our manuscript. This work was supported by EU Marie Curie Training Network MRTN-CT-2005-019564 EVAN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Benazzi.

Additional information

S. Benazzi and E. Stansfield contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benazzi, S., Stansfield, E., Milani, C. et al. Geometric morphometric methods for three-dimensional virtual reconstruction of a fragmented cranium: the case of Angelo Poliziano. Int J Legal Med 123, 333–344 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0339-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0339-6

Keywords

Navigation