Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nasal douches for diseases of the nose and the paranasal sinuses—a comparative in vitro investigation

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nasal douches are applied in great number of diseases of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. For this purpose, many different kinds of nasal douching systems have been introduced into the market. The aim of this study was to examine the irrigation characteristics of the current nasal douching systems. In this context, 26 nasal douching systems were compared regarding irrigation volume, irrigation duration, flow rate and pressure and course of the irrigation stream. The following procedure was applied: First, the spontaneous flow through the nasal douche was measured, then the flow under compression. Finally, these procedures were repeated using a nose model. Furthermore, we asked the manufacturers for information concerning possible cleaning and disinfection techniques. Douching period and flow rate highly depend on physical parameters: distance between liquid column and outlet (hydrostatic pressure) and form and size of the outlet (energy loss because of friction/turbulence). A weak irrigation stream was found in spontaneous release of the douching system when both douching pressure and flow rate offered low values. The douching of the nose model showed that the incompressible nasal douches only reached the lower nasal passage. Only the compressible nasal douching systems led to a diffuse moisturization as well as to a perfusion of the entire nasal cavity. Systematic evaluation of the different recommended cleaning and disinfection methods of the nasal douching systems is still missing. Nasal douches are often recommended in many diseases of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. In this comparative in vitro study, physical parameters and material properties of the nasal douching systems were examined for the first time. For irrigation of the whole nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, compressible douching systems are recommended which have a minimum output pressure of 120 mbar, a good connection of the outlet to the nostril with a possible insertion into the nasal vestibule and an irrigation stream which is directed upwards (45°). The material should be transparent, easy to clean and disinfect and should not contain harmful elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown CL, Graham SC (2004) Nasal irrigation: good or bad? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12:9–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fokkens WJ et al (2007) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Rhinol Suppl 20:1–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabago D, Zgierska A (2009) Saline nasal irrigations for upper respiratory conditions. Am Fam Physician 80:1117–1119 (21–22)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenfeld RM, Andes D, Bhattacharyya N, Cheung D, Eisenberg S, Ganiats TG, Gelzer A, Hamilos D, Haydon RC 3rd, Hudgins PA, Jones S, Krouse HJ, Lee LH, Mahoney MC, Marple BF, Mitchell CJ, Nathan R, Shiffman RN, Smith TL, Witsell DL (2007) Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:S1–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, Wright ED, Kaplan A, Bouchard J, Ciavarella A, Doyle PW, Javer AR, Leith ES, Mukherji A, Robert Schellenberg R, Small P, Witterick IJ (2011) Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 40 Suppl 2:S99–S193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey R, Hannan SA, Badia L, Scadding G (2007) Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD006394

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hermelingmeier KE, Weber R, Hellmich M, Heubach C, Mösges R (2012) Nasal irrigations as an adjunctive treatment in allergic rhinitis—Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hildenbrand T, Weber R, Heubach C, Mösges R (2011) Nasal douching in acute rhinosinusitis. Laryngorhinootologie 90(6):346–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hildenbrand T, Weber RK, Brehmer D (2011) Rhinitis sicca, dry nose and atrophic rhinitis: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(1):17–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Michel O (2006) Nasenspülung bei Rhinosinusitis. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 85:448–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt T. Die tägliche Nasenspülung mit Salzwasser zur Vorbeugung und Behandlung von Atemwegserkrankungen. http://www.nasespuelen.de

  12. Schmidt Th, Bitzer EM, Dörning H, Lüpsen H, Schwartz FW, Robra BP (2004) Tägliches Nasespülen reduziert Atemwegsbeschwerden - eine randomisierte Crossover-Studie. Gesundheitswesen :66. doi:10.1055/s-2004-833862

  13. Georgitis JW (1994) Nasal hyperthermia and simple irrigation for perennial rhinitis. Changes in inflammatory mediators. Chest 106(5):1487–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boek WM, Keleş N, Graamans K, Huizing EH (1999) Physiologic and hypertonic saline solutions impair ciliary activity in vitro. Laryngoscope 109(3):396–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Talbot AR, Herr TM, Parsons DS (1997) Mucociliary clearance and buffered hypertonic saline solution. Laryngoscope 107(4):500–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber R (2010) Nasenspülungen–Wirksamkeit und Indikationen. Eine Literaturübersicht. HNO kompakt 18:151–164

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beule A, Athanasiadis T, Athanasiadis E, Field J, Wormald PJ (2009) Efficacy of different techniques of sinonasal irrigation after modified Lothrop procedure. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(1):85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harvey RJ, Goddard JC, Wise SK, Schlosser RJ (2008) Effects of endoscopic sinus surgery and delivery device on cadaver sinus irrigation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harvey RJ, Schlosser RJ (2009) Local drug delivery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:829–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller TR, Muntz HR, Gilbert ME, Orlandi RR (2004) Comparison of topical medication delivery systems after sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 114:201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JM, Nayak JV, Doghramji LL, Welch KC, Chiu AG (2010) Assessing the risk of irrigation bottle and fluid contamination after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24(3):197–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Welch KC, Cohen MB, Doghramji LL, Cohen NA, Chandra RK, Palmer JN, Chiu AG (2009) Clinical correlation between irrigation bottle contamination and clinical outcomes in post-functional endoscopic sinus surgery patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(4):401–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Keen M, Foreman A, Wormald PJ (2010) The clinical significance of nasal irrigation bottle contamination. Laryngoscope 120(10):2110–2114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have a financial relationship with any organization that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ENT Department, Hospital of Karlsruhe, Moltkestr. 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Janna Campos & Werner Heppt

  2. Rhinology Center, ENT Department, Philipps-University of Marburg, UKGM, Marburg, Germany

    Rainer Weber

Authors
  1. Janna Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Werner Heppt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rainer Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janna Campos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campos, J., Heppt, W. & Weber, R. Nasal douches for diseases of the nose and the paranasal sinuses—a comparative in vitro investigation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 2891–2899 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2398-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2398-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation