Skip to main content
Log in

Non-invasive measurement of liver iron concentration using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: validation against biopsy

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Gastrointestinal to this article was published on 09 January 2018

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the performance and limitations of the R2* and signal intensity ratio (SIR) methods for quantifying liver iron concentration (LIC) at 3 T.

Methods

A total of 105 patients who underwent a liver biopsy with biochemical LIC (LICb) were included prospectively. All patients underwent a 3-T MRI scan with a breath-hold multiple-echo gradient-echo sequence (mGRE). LIC calculated by 3-T SIR algorithm (LICSIR) and by R2* (LICR2*) were correlated with LICb. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. The comparison of methods was analysed for successive classes.

Results

LICb was strongly correlated with R2* (r = 0.95, p < 0.001) and LICSIR (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). In comparison to LICb, LICR2* and LICSIR detect liver iron overload with a sensitivity/specificity of 0.96/0.93 and 0.92/0.95, respectively, and a bias ± SD of 7.6 ± 73.4 and 14.8 ± 37.6 μmol/g, respectively. LICR2* presented the lowest differences for patients with LICb values under 130 μmol/g. Above this value, LICSIR has the lowest differences.

Conclusions

At 3 T, R2* provides precise LIC quantification for lower overload but the SIR method is recommended to overcome R2* limitations in higher overload. Our software, available at www.mrquantif.org, uses both methods jointly and selects the best one.

Key points

Liver iron can be accurately quantified by MRI at 3 T

At 3 T, R2* provides precise quantification of slight liver iron overload

At 3 T, SIR method is recommended in case of high iron overload

Slight liver iron overload present in metabolic syndrome can be depicted

Treatment can be monitored with great confidence

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

area under the curve

BMI:

body mass index

DIOS:

dysmetabolic iron overload syndrome

LIC:

liver iron concentration

LICb :

LIC assessed by biopsy using biochemical analysis

LICR2* :

LIC calculated by T2* conversion

LICSIR :

LIC calculated by SIR method

mGRE:

multiple-echo gradient-echo sequence

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

NASH:

non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

SIR:

signal intensity ratio

References

  1. Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M et al (2013) The burden of liver disease in Europe: a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol 58:593–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moukhadder HM, Halawi R, Cappellini MD, Taher AT (2017) Hepatocellular carcinoma as an emerging morbidity in the thalassemia syndromes: a comprehensive review. Cancer 123:751–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deugnier Y, Turlin B (2011) Pathology of hepatic iron overload. Semin Liver Dis 31:260–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hatfield MK, Beres RA, Sane SS, Zaleski GX (2008) Percutaneous imaging-guided solid organ core needle biopsy: coaxial versus noncoaxial method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wood JC, Zhang P, Rienhoff H et al (2015) Liver MRI is more precise than liver biopsy for assessing total body iron balance: a comparison of MRI relaxometry with simulated liver biopsy results. Magn Reson Imaging 33:761–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B et al (2001) Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J 22:2171–2179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. St Pierre TG, Clark PR, Chua-anusorn W et al (2005) Noninvasive measurement and imaging of liver iron concentrations using proton magnetic resonance. Blood 105:855–861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood JC, Enriquez C, Ghugre N et al (2005) MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration in transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients. Blood 106:1460–1465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hankins JS, McCarville MB, Loeffler RB et al (2009) R2* magnetic resonance imaging of the liver in patients with iron overload. Blood 113:4853–4855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Garbowski MW, Carpenter J-P, Smith G et al (2014) Biopsy-based calibration of T2* magnetic resonance for estimation of liver iron concentration and comparison with R2 Ferriscan. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16:40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Henninger B, Zoller H, Rauch S et al (2015) R2* relaxometry for the quantification of hepatic iron overload: biopsy-based calibration and comparison with the literature. Rofo 187:472–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gandon Y, Olivié D, Guyader D et al (2004) Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI. Lancet 363:357–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alústiza JM, Artetxe J, Castiella A et al (2004) MR quantification of hepatic iron concentration. Radiology 230:479–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ernst O, Rose C, Sergent G, L’Herminé C (1999) Hepatic iron overload: quantification with MR imaging at 1.5 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1141–1142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brissot P, Troadec M-B, Bardou-Jacquet E et al (2008) Current approach to hemochromatosis. Blood Rev 22:195–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meloni A, Positano V, Keilberg P et al (2012) Feasibility, reproducibility, and reliability for the T*2 iron evaluation at 3 T in comparison with 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 68:543–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paisant A, Boulic A, Bardou-Jacquet E et al (2017) Assessment of liver iron overload by 3 T MRI. Abdom Radiol N Y 42:1713–1720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD et al (2009) Liver biopsy. Hepatology 49:1017–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bacon BR, Adams PC, Kowdley KV et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of hemochromatosis: 2011 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 54:328–343

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Barry M, Sherlock S (1971) Measurement of liver-iron concentration in needle-biopsy specimens. Lancet 1:100–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Storey P, Thompson AA, Carqueville CL et al (2007) R2* imaging of transfusional iron burden at 3T and comparison with 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 25:540–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anwar M, Wood J, Manwani D et al (2013) Hepatic iron quantification on 3 Tesla (3 T) magnetic resonance (MR): technical challenges and solutions. Radiol Res Pract 2013:628150

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose C, Vandevenne P, Bourgeois E et al (2006) Liver iron content assessment by routine and simple magnetic resonance imaging procedure in highly transfused patients. Eur J Haematol 77:145–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krafft AJ, Loeffler RB, Song R et al (2017) Quantitative ultrashort echo time imaging for assessment of massive iron overload at 1.5 and 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26592

Download references

Acknowledgements

We received support from the national clinical research program for public hospitals of France. Thanks to Tracey Westcott for the language help. Thanks to all the MRI team of University Hospital of Rennes.

Funding

This study has received funding by the French national research program “Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Gandon.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof Yves Gandon

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors (MJ) is a senior biostatistician and has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

The study protocol (Clinical trial NCT00401336) was approved by the local institutional review board (ref. 05/17-544).

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

This series of patients have been previously used to define a liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) algorithm from five different monoecho sequences. Here we report the R2* results calculated from a multiecho sequence. We also calculated SIR results from this unique sequence using the previously reported algorithm based on monoecho sequences.

Methodology

• prospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

d’Assignies, G., Paisant, A., Bardou-Jacquet, E. et al. Non-invasive measurement of liver iron concentration using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: validation against biopsy. Eur Radiol 28, 2022–2030 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5106-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5106-3

Keywords

Navigation