Abstract
Clonal production of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) through somatic embryogenesis has the potential to meet the increasing industrial demands for high-quality uniform raw materials. A major barrier to the commercialization of this technology is the low quality of the resulting embryos. Twenty-five newly initiated loblolly pine genotypes were followed through the process of liquid culture establishment, embryo maturation, germination, and retrieval from cryogenic storage. A maturation medium, capable of promoting the development of loblolly pine somatic embryos that can germinate, is presented that combines 1/2 P6 modified salts, 2% maltose, 13% polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG), 5 mg/l abscisic acid (ABA), and 2.5 g/l Gelrite. A procedure for converting and acclimating germinants to growth in soil and greenhouse conditions is also described. A set of somatic seedlings, produced from the maturation medium, showed 100% survival when planted in a field setting. Somatic seedlings showed normal yearly growth relative to standard seedlings from natural seed. The quality of the resulting embryos was examined and compared to that of zygotic embryos using such parameters as morphology, dry weight, germination performance, and gene expression. All of the observations that were made support the conclusion that even with the new maturation medium somatic embryos grow approximately only halfway through the normal sequence of development and then prematurely discontinue growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attree SM, Fowke LC (1993) Embryogeny of gymnosperms: advances in synthetic seed technology of conifers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 35:1–35
Attree SM, Moore D, Sawhney VK, Fowke LC (1991) Enhanced maturation and desiccation tolerance of white spruce (Picea glauca) somatic embryos: effect of a non-plasmolyzing water stress and abscisic acid. Ann Bot 68:519–525
Becwar MR, Pullman GS (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). In: Jain S, Gupta PK, Newton RJ (eds) Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants, vol 3. Gymnosperms. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 287–301
Becwar MR, Wann SR, Johnson MA, Verhagen SA, Feirer RP, Nagmani R (1988) Development and characterization of in vitro embryogenic systems in conifers. In: Ahuja MR (ed) Somatic cell genetics of woody plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–18
Cairney J, Xu N, Pullman GS, Ciavatta VT, Johns B (1999) Natural and somatic embryo development in loblolly pine: Gene expression studies using differential display and DNA Arrays. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77–79:5–17
Cairney J, Xu N, Mackay J, Pullman J (2000) Transcript profiling: a tool to assess the development of conifer embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:155–162
Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1985) Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Rep 4:177–179
Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1987) Biotechnology of somatic polyembryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in loblolly pine. Biotechnology 5:147–151
Gupta PK, Pullman GS (1990) Method for reproducing coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis. U.S. Patent No. 4,957,866, September 18, 1990
Gupta PK, Pullman G, Timmis R, Kreitinger M, Carlson W, Grob J, Welty E (1993) Forestry in the 21st century: the biotechnology of somatic embryogenesis. Biotechnology 11:454–459
Handley LW, Becwar MR, Chesick EE, Coke JE, Godbey AP, Rutter MR (1994) Research and development of commercial tissue culture systems in loblolly pine, Pinus taeda L. In: Proc TAPPI Biol Sci Symp. TAPPI Press, pp 47–55
Iraqi D, Tremblay FM (2001) The role of sucrose during maturation of black spruce (Picea mariana) and white spruce (Picea glauca) somatic embryos. Physiol Plant 111:381–388
Jalonen P, von Arnold S (1991) Characterization of embryogenic cell lines of Picea abies in relation to their competence for maturation. Plant Cell Rep 10:384–387
Kartha KK, Fowke LC, Leung NL, Caswell KL, Hakman I (1988) Induction of somatic embryos and plantlets from cryopreserved cell cultures of white spruce (Picea abies). J Plant Physiol 132:529–539
Li XY, Huang H, Gbur EE Jr (1997) Polyethylene glycol-promoted development of somatic embryos in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 33:184–189
Li XY, Huang H, Murphy BJ, Gbur Jr EE (1998) Polyethylene glycol and maltose enhance somatic embryo maturation in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 34:22–26
McNutt J, Rennel J (1997) Future of fiber in tomorrow's world. Pulp Paper Int 39:48–51
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Pullman GS (1997) Osmotic measurements of whole ovules during loblolly pine embryo development. In: Proc TAPPI Biol Sci Sym. TAPPI Press, pp 41–48
Pullman GS, Gupta PK (1991) Method for reproducing coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis using adsorbent materials in the development stage. U.S. Patent No. 5034326, July 23, 1991
Pullman GS, Johnson S (2002) Somatic embryogenesis in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.): improving culture initiation rates. Ann For Sci 59:663–668
Pullman GS, Webb DT (1994) An embryo staging system for comparison of zygotic and somatic embryo development. In: Proc TAPPI Biol Sci Symp. TAPPI Press, pp 31–34
Pullman GS, Cairney J, Peter G (1998) Clonal forestry and genetic engineering: where we stand, future prospects, and potential impacts on mill operations. TAPPI J 81:57–64
Rutter MR, Handley III LW, Becwar MR (1998a) Method for regeneration of coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis employing polyethylene glycol. U. S. Patent No. 5,731,191, March 24, 1998
Rutter MR, Handley III LW, Becwar MR (1998b) Method for regeneration of coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis employing polyethylene glycol. U.S. Patent No. 5,731,204, March 24, 1998
Schenk RU, Hildebrandt AC (1972) Medium and techniques for induction and growth of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Can J Bot 50:199–204
Schultz RP (1999) Loblolly—the pine for the twenty-first century. New For 17:71–88
Sutton B, Plonenko D, Ingraham K, Eastman A, Grossnickle S (1997) Operational production of seedlings for reforestation using somatic embryogenesis. In: Proc TAPPI Biol Sci Symp. TAPPI Press, pp 191–194
Tang W, Ouyang F, Guo ZC (1998) Studies on embryogenic callus induction and plant regeneration in loblolly pine. Sci Silv Sin 34:115–119
Tautorus TE, Fowke LC, Dunstan DI (1991) Somatic embryogenesis in conifers. Can J Bot 69:1873–1899
Uddin MR (1993) Somatic embryogenesis in gymnosperms. U.S. Patent No. 5,187,092
Uddin MR, Dinus RJ, Webb DT (1990) Effects of different carbohydrates on maturation of Pinus taeda somatic embryos. In: Seventh Int Congr Plant Tissue Cell Cult. Abstr B-127. Amsterdam, p 272
Westvaco Company (1998) Workhorse of the South. For Focus 22:10–13
Xu N, Johns B, Pullman GS, Cairney J (1997) Rapid and reliable differential display from minute amounts of tissue: mass cloning and characterization of differentially expressed genes from loblolly pine embryos. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:377–391
Yu WC, Joyce PJ, Cameron DC, McCown BH (2000) Sucrose utilization during potato microtuber growth in bioreactors. Plant Cell Rep 19:407–413
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Member Companies of IPST and the Georgia Consortium for Pulp and Paper Competitiveness for their support. We also thank Barbara Johns, Paul Montello, Yolanda Powell, Teresa Vales, Greg Elay, Chantal Murenzi, Sarah Sward, and Jennifer Langstraat for technical assistance and Mike Cunningham, Randy Purvis, and Jerome Martin at Union Camp Corporation for establishment of these seedlings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by G.C. Phillips
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pullman, G.S., Johnson, S., Peter, G. et al. Improving loblolly pine somatic embryo maturation: comparison of somatic and zygotic embryo morphology, germination, and gene expression. Plant Cell Rep 21, 747–758 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-003-0586-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-003-0586-9