Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance of bucket drip irrigation powered by treadle pump on tomato and maize/bean production in Malawi

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of a bucket drip irrigation system (BDI) powered by treadle pump was evaluated on tomato and intercropped maize/bean crops, between 2005 and 2007 in Malawi. It was a split plot experiment with three replicates. The BDI system consisted of a 1,300-l tank mounted 1.5 m above ground and connected with a 32-mm mainline and 15-mm lateral lines spaced at 1 m by 0.6 m. A treadle pump was used to uplift water to the tank. Tomato and intercropped maize/bean were irrigated every 4 days. The system reduced labour and water by >25% and it showed high uniform application depth and wetted diameter. Yields were significantly different between tomato varieties (P < 0.05). Maize/bean yields were highly significantly different between monoculture, intercropping system and bean varieties (P < 0.001). Consequently, an economic analysis shows that there is a significant difference, in terms of net income, between the various crop enterprises. Tomato was more valuable with BDI, compared to maize and beans. It can be concluded that BDI, powered by a treadle pump, saves labour and time and it provides uniform irrigation for crop production. Therefore, tomato is recommended for use with this system, compared to maize and bean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RA, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements (FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56). FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Alva AK, Prakash A, Hornsby A, Fares A (1999) Distribution of rainfall and soil moisture content in soil profile under citrus tree canopy and dripline. Irrig Sci 18:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André RGB, Churata-Masca MGC (1992) Water requirement and crop coefficient for processing tomatoes. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 301:165–170 http://www.actahort.org/books/301/301_18.htm

  • Barak E (1986) In-service training irrigation research project. December 1981 to November. Final activity available: ministry of agriculture. Department of Agriculture Research, Malawi

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt CM, O’Connor K, Ruehr T (1995) Fertigation, California polytechnic state university. Order from: the irrigation training and research center, California polytechnic state university (Cal Poly). San Luis Obispo, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Busscher WJ (1987) A comparison of uniformity measures for drip irrigation systems. Trans ASAE 40(4):1013–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin O, Uygan D (2008) The effect of drip line spacing, irrigation regimes and planting geometries of tomato on yield, irrigation water use efficiency and net return. Agric Water Manage 95(8):949–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin O, Yildirim O, Uygan D, Boyaci H (2002) Irrigation scheduling of drip irrigated tomato using class A pan evaporation. Turk J Agric For 26:171–178 TUB/TAK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cevik B (1978) The effect of trickle irrigation method applied to different textured soils in greenhouse on the yield, quality and earliness of tomatoes under Çukurova conditions. Yearbook of Çukurova University of Agriculture Faculty, Adana, Turkey. No 9(8), 204–218

  • Çevik B (1977) A research on selection of most suitable irrigation methods for tomato growth under greenhouse conditions in Çukurova. Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Agricultural Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana, 124 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanson B, Schwankl L, Grattan S, Prichard T (1994) Drip irrigation for row crops. University of California, Davis. Order from Cooperative Extension office, Department of LAWR, 113 Veihmeyer Hall, University of California, Davis

  • Enciso JM, Coloaizzi PD, Multer WL (2005) Economic analysis of subsurface drip irrigation lateral spacing and installation depth for cotton. Trans ASAE 48(1):197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandika IR, Burgess P (2008) Comparative response of irrigated maize to organic and inorganic fertilizer at Kasinthula Research Station in Malawi. In: Nhira C, Mapiki A, Rankhumise P (eds) In land and water management for the Southern Africa: towards sustainable agriculture. Chapter 17. RSA, Pretoria, pp 216–236

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1966) Water development for food security, irrigation technology transfer to East and Southern Africa. Irrigation economist,- Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe, by K. Palanisami, Water development management services, land and water development division, Rome July, 1996

  • Fares A, Alva AK (2000) Evaluation of capacitance probes for optimal irrigation of citrus through soil moisture monitoring in an Entisol profile. Irrig Sci 19:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D, Gornat B, Rimon D (1976) Drip irrigation. Drip Irrigation Scientific Publications, Kfar Shmaryahu, 296 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan FA (1998) Microirrigation management and maintenance, agro industrial management. Fresno, California, p 233

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell T (2001) Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agron J 19:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhaw SS, Gutal GB, Chougule AA (1990) Cost economies of the drip irrigation system for tomatoes crop. Department of agricultural engineering, college of agriculture, Pune

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabutha C, Blank H, van Koppen B (2000) Drip irrigation kits for small-holder farmers in Kenya: experience and way forward. In: 6th international microirrigation congress, South Africa. 22–27 Oct 2000

  • Kadyampakeni D, Mangisoni JH, Singa DD, Mloza-Banda HR, Ferguson A, Snapp S, Mwendo-Phiri E (2004) Impact of irrigated and water management practices on bean production in Chingale area development programme, Zomba, Malawi. East African Journal of Rural Development, Msc Thesis

  • Kaluwa PWR, Mtambo FM, Fatch R (1997) The country situation report on water resources in Malawi. UNDP/SADC Water Initiative

  • Kauta GJC, Kadwa FE (1994) Yield response to water. A paper presented at the soils and agricultural engineering group project meeting, August, 1994, Chitedze Agricultural Research station, Lilongwe, Malawi

  • Kay M, Brabben T (2000) Treadle pumps for irrigation in Africa. International programme for technology and research in irrigation and drainage. Knowledge synthesis report No 1, Oct 2001, ISSN 1607-6613

  • Keller J, Bleisner RD (1990) Sprinkler and trickle irrigation. Chapman and Hall. Republished by Blackburn Press, Nov 2000, ISBN 1-930665-19-9

  • Keller J, Karmeli D (1974) Trickle irrigation design for optimal soil wetting. Proceedings of II International Drip Irrigation Congress 7–14 July 1974, San Diego, California, USA

  • Koral AI, Altun A (2000) The production inputs guidelines of agricultural products in Turkiye. The General Directorate of Rural Services Publications, No: 104, Ankara, pp 360

  • Malawi Government (2006) Guide to agriculture production manual. Ministry of Agriculture, Lilongwe

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangison JH (2006) Impact of treadle pump irrigation technology on smallholder poverty and food security in Malawi. A case study of Blantyre and Mchinji District report to IWMI Southern Africa Sub-Region Office. Pretoria, RSA. http://treadle-pump.com/download/Malawi%20Treadle%20Pump.pdf

  • Martin EC, Obermyer KC, Pegelow FJ, Sheedy M, Ditmar S (1999) Effects of high frequency irrigation on irrigation uniformity. In: COTTON. A College of Agriculture Report. The University of Arizona. Series P-116, Pub. AZ1123

  • Maweru SCY (2004) Current initiatives on micro-irrigation and smallholder markets in Malawi. In: Mangisoni JH (ed) Proceedings of stakeholders experience and lesson sharing workshop on small scale irrigation and market development. Malawi Institute of Management, Lilongwe, pp 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture and irrigation (2003) Simple priority Irrigation programs, Lilongwe, Malawi

  • Mzembe CP (1994) Overview of irrigation development in Malawi. Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Lilongwe

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir D (1982) Drip irrigation. In: Finkel HJ (ed) Handbook of irrigation technology, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 247–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Payero JO, Tarkalson DD, Irmak S, Davison D, Petersen JL (2008) Effects of irrigation amounts applied with subsurface drip irrigation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, and dry matter production in semiarid climate. Agric Water Manage 95:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shock CC (2006) Drip irrigation: an introduction. EM8782. In: sustainable agricultural technique. Oregon State University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Tanner CB, Bennet JM (1984) Water use efficiency in crop production. Bioscience 34:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gulik BC (1999) BC trickle irrigation manual. Ministry of agriculture and food resource management branch. Order from irrigation association of British Columbia, Abbotsford

  • Wilson TP, Zoldoske DF (1997) Evaluation of sprinkler irrigation uniformity. Department of Water Resources, California CATI Publication #970703

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazzar A, Sezen SM, Gencel B (2002) Drip irrigation of corn in Southeast Anatalia Project (GAP) area in Turkey. Irrig Drain 51:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zotarelli L, Scholberg JM, Dukes MD, Mun¯oz-Carpena R, Icerman I (2009a) Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agric Water Manage 96:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zotarelli L, Dukes MD, Scholberg JM, Mun¯oz-Carpena R, Icerman I (2009b) Tomato nitrogen accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency on a sandy soil, affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agric Water Manage 96:1247–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the Malawi National Research Council for awarding a research grant and the Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Dr. A.T. Daudi and the Director of Department of Agricultural Services, Dr. A.P. Mtukuso, for partly funding this project, in addition to their collaborative support for the Bucket Drip Irrigation Research Project. We are also grateful to Mr. Henry Mapwesera, Cathren Bottomani, Horace Kakhiwa, Collins Chitawo, Gift Mafunga and Charles Nthewa, for their technical support during the Bucket Drip Irrigation Experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Rhinnexious Fandika.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Trooien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fandika, I.R., Kadyampakeni, D. & Zingore, S. Performance of bucket drip irrigation powered by treadle pump on tomato and maize/bean production in Malawi. Irrig Sci 30, 57–68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0260-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0260-2

Keywords

Navigation