Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elective Inguinal Hernia Repair with Mesh: Is there a Need for Antibiotic Prophylaxis? — A Review

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although it is widely accepted that antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated in elective mesh repair of inguinal hernia, the evidence for its value has been controversial. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis showed that there is insufficient data overall to demonstrate a clear advantage of prophylaxis and illustrated the classic problem in evidence-based medicine where a lack of evidence in support of an intervention may be interpreted as a reason not to implement it. This review of the literature evaluates the evidence for the effectiveness of intravenous antibiotics as prophylaxis in inguinal hernia repair with mesh. Pubmed and Embase searches revealed seven trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in mesh repair of inguinal hernia. The quality of the evidence and the limitations of the seven trials are discussed. Analysis of these seven trials adds to the Cochrane meta-analysis of Sanchez-Manuel and Seco-Gil. Only two of the trials support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, and those were the only double-blind randomized controlled trials reviewed. In evidence-based medicine the absence of evidence in clear support of an intervention (as in this review, where only two of the seven trials support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis) may be taken as reason not to implement the intervention. It is possible, however, that what is needed to clarify the issue are further randomized controlled trials, rigorously performed and recruiting significantly larger numbers of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown RB, Bradley S, Opitz E, et al. Surgical wound infections documented after hospital discharge. Am. J. Infect. Control 1987;15:54–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Law DJW, Mishriki SF, Jeffrey PJ. The importance of surveillance after discharge from hospital in the diagnosis of postoperative wound infection. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1990;72:207–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosendorf LL, Octavio J, Estes JP. Effect of method of post discharge wound infection surveillance on reported infection rates. Am. J. Infect. Control 1983;11:226–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey SI, Karran SE, Toyn K. Community surveillance of complications after hernia surgery. B. M. J. 1992;304:469–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Santos KRN, Neto GPB, Fonseca LS, et al. Incidence surveillance of wound infection in hernia surgery during hospitalisation and after discharge in a university hospital. J. Hosp. Infect. 1997;36:229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor EW, Byrne DJ, Leaper DJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis and open groin hernia repair. World J. Surg. 1997;21:811–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am. J. Surg. 1989;157:188–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cainzos MA. Antibiotic prophylaxis. New Horiz, 1998;6(2):S11–S17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong-Beringer A, Corelli RL, Schrock TR. Influence of the timing of antibiotic administration on tissue concentrations during surgery. Am. J. Surg. 1994;167:391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Classen DC, Evans RC, Pestotnik SL. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical wound infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992;326:281–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; Centers for Disease Control; Surgical Infection Society. Consensus Paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1992;13:606–608

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mann DV, Prout J, Havranek E, et al. Late-onset deep prosthetic infection following mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Am. J. Surg. 1998;176:12–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Condon RE, Wittmann DH. The use of antibiotics in general surgery. Curr. Probl. Surg. 1991;28:803–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Page CP, Bohnen JMA, Fletcher JR, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds. Guidelines for clinical care. Arch. Surg. 1993;128:79–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woods RK, Dellinger EP. Current guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wounds. Am. Family Physician 1998:57:2731–2734

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network 2003

  17. Yerdel MA, Akin EB, Dofalan S, et al. Effect of single dose prophylactic ampicillin and sulbactam on wound infection after tension-free inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh. Ann. Surg. 2001;233;1:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Celdran A, Frieyro O, De La Pinta JC, et al. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infection after mesh hernia repair under local anesthesia on an ambulatory basis. Hernia 2004;8:20–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Platt R, Zaleznik DF, Hopkins CC, et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for herniorraphy and breast surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990;322:3:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbert AI, Felton LL. Infection in inguinal hernia repair considering biomaterials and antibiotics. Surg. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1993;177:126–130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gervino L, Cangioni G, Renzi F. A retrospective study on the efficacy of short-term perioperative prophylaxis in abdominal surgery for hernia repair in 1254 patients. J. Chemother. 2000;12(suppl 3):34–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahmy EA. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in abdominal surgery for hernia repair: retrospective study of 1524 consecutive patients. J. Chemother. 1998;10:248–253

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hill C, Flamant R, Mazas F, et al. Prophylactic cefazolin versus placebo in total hip replacement. Lancet 1981;1:795–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaiser AB, Petracek MR, Lea JV. Efficacy of cefazolin and gentamicin as prophylactic agents in cardiac surgery: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in 1030 patients. Ann. Surg. 1987;206:791–797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Conte JE, Jacob IS, Polk HC. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery—A Comprehensive Review, 1st edition, Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  26. Glasgow F. Is post operative wound infection following simple inguinal herniorraphy a predisposing cause for recurrent hernia? Can. J. Surg. 1964;91:870–871

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Seco-Gil JL. Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair. (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This review was prepared as part of the M.Sc. in Surgical Practice programme developed by the Kent Institute of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Kent. I am grateful to Mr. Tom Bates and Dr. Helen Thomas for their help in its preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema Biswas BSc, MRCS.

Additional information

This review was prepared as part of the MSc in Surgical Practice programme developed by the Kent Institute of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Kent

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biswas, S. Elective Inguinal Hernia Repair with Mesh: Is there a Need for Antibiotic Prophylaxis? — A Review. World J. Surg. 29, 830–836 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7854-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7854-5

Keywords

Navigation