Skip to main content
Log in

The time course of visuo-motor affordances

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To measure dynamic visuo-motor coupling within the two hemispheres, we showed observers an animation of a rotating cup. They indicated with left or right buttons when a fixation dot in the center of the animation changed color. For either hand, response times changed continuously with the irrelevant position of the cup’s handle, even when the perceptual asymmetry of the handle was controlled. This spontaneous lateralized motor preparation showed both top-down and bottom-up components and was more pronounced for the right than the left hand. The dynamic affordance method will help understand perception–action coupling in the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We averaged across cup rotations as this factor did not reliably interact with the other factors in RT, all P > 0.18. The only reliable interaction for cup rotation was with response buttons in the error rates, F(2, 38) = 3.48, P < 0.05, MSE = 127.56, eta2 = 0.16, due to a transition from more left to more right errors with later rotations.

References

  • Aziz-Zadeh L, Koski L, Zaidel E, Mazziotta J, Iacoboni M (2006) Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system. J Neurosci 26:2964–2970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craighero L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G, Umilta C (1999) Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1673–1692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:761–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH, Deubel H, Wohlschlaeger A, Schneider WX (1999) Visuomotor mental rotation of saccade direction. Exp Brain Res 127:224–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez CL, Ganel T, Goodale MA (2006) Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. J Neurophysiol 95:3496–3501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD (2004) Sight unseen. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano MS, Gross CG (1998) Spatial maps for the control of movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:195–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handy TC, Grafton ST, Shroff NM, Ketay S, Gazzaniga MS (2003) Graspable objects grasp attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat Neurosci 6:421–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handy TC, Borg JS, Turk DJ, Tipper CM, Grafton ST, Gazzaniga MS (2005) Placing a tool in the spotlight: spatial attention modulates visuomotor responses in cortex. NeuroImage 26:266–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ (2001) Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nat Neurosci 4:84–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meegan DV, Tipper SP (1998) Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects. Q J Exp Psychol A 51:225–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzer G, Georgopoulos AP (1993) Common processing constraints for visuo-motor and visual mental rotation. Exp Brain Res 93:165–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JC, Ward R (2002) S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: time Course and specificity of response activation. Vis Cogn 9:540–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Edwards S, Baker T, Willson K (2003) Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat Neurosci 6:82–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy EA (1985) Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders. North Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (2001) The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Vis Cogn 8:769–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol (Amst) 116:185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev Monogr Suppl 3(2(whole no. 13)):1–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin H. Fischer.

Additional information

MHF was supported by the British Academy through grant SG-39222. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, M.H., Dahl, C.D. The time course of visuo-motor affordances. Exp Brain Res 176, 519–524 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0781-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0781-3

Keywords

Navigation