Skip to main content
Log in

Fair ranking of teachers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic theory suggests that it is optimal to reward teachers depending on the relative performance of their students. We develop an econometric approach, based on stochastic frontier analysis, to construct a fair ranking that accounts for the socio-economic background of students and schools and the imprecision inherent in achievement data. Using German PIRLS (IGLU) data, we exploit the hierarchical structure of the data to estimate the efficiency of each teacher. A parsimonious set of control variables suffices to get a “fair” estimate of unobserved teacher quality. A Hausman–Taylor type estimator is the preferred estimator because teacher efficiency and some exogenous variables may be correlated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angrist JD, Guryan J (2004) Teacher testing, teacher education, and teacher characteristics. Am Econ Rev 94:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou D (2001) Pay for performance in public and private schools. Econ Educ Rev 20:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black SE, Lynch LM (2001) How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev Econ Stat 83:434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertig M, Kluve J (2005) The effect of age at school entry on educational attainment in Germany. RWI Discussion Papers No. 27

  • Goldstein, H (1997) Methods in school effectiveness research. School Eff School Improv 8:369–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong B, Sickles RC (1992) Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis. J Econom 51:259–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Rivkin SG (1999) Do higher salaries buy better teachers? NBER Working Paper 7082

  • Hanushek EA, Raymond ME (2004) The effect of school accountability systems on the level and distribution of student achievement. J Eur Econ Assoc 2:406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA, Taylor WE (1981) Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49:1377–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby CM (2002) The cost of accountability. NBER Working Paper 8855

  • Jacob BA (2005) Accountability, incentives and behavior: the impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. J Public Econ 89:761–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürges H, Schneider K, Büchel F (2005a) The effect of central exit examinations on student achievement: quasi-experimental evidence from TIMSS Germany. J Eur Econ Assoc 3:1134–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürges H, Richter WF, Schneider K (2005b) Teacher quality and incentives. Theoretical and empirical effects of standards on teacher quality. FinanzArchiv 61:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürges H, Schneider K (2006) Age at school entry and teacher’s recommendations for secondary school track choice in Germany. Paper presented at the 20th annual ESPE conference, Verona

  • Kane TJ, Staiger DO (2002a) Volatility in school test scores: implications for test-based accountability systems, Brookings Papers on Education Policy 2002, pp 235–283

  • Kane TJ, Staiger DO (2002b) The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. J Econ Perspect 16:91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic Frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd HF, Walsh RP (2002) Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness: getting the incentives right. Econ Educ Rev 21:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy V (2002) Evaluating the effect of teachers’ group performance incentives on pupil achievement. J Polit Econ 110:1286–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy V (2004) Performance pay and teachers’ effort, productivity and grading ethics, NBER Working Paper 10622

  • Mullis IVS, Martin MO, Gonzalez EJ, Kennedy AM (2003) PIRLS2001 International Report: IEA’s Study of Reading Literacy Achievement in Primary Schools. Boston College, Chestnut Hill MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne J (2000) School teachers’ review body gives green light to performance-related pay. http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2000/11/feature/uk0011100f.html

  • Propper C, Wilson D (2003) The use and usefulness of performance measures in the public sector. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 19:250–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhani P, Weber A (2005) Does the early bird catch the worm? Instrumental variable estimates of the educational effects of age at school entry in Germany. IZA Discussion Paper 1827

  • Skrondal A, Rabe-Hasketh S (2004) Generalized latent variable modeling Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles RC (2005) Panel estimators and the identification of firm-specific efficiency levels in parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric settings. J Econom 126:305–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan K (1999) Teachers standards and professionalism: contested perspectives in a decade of reform. Paper presented at the AARE-NZARE 1999. http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/ sul99090.htm

  • West MR, Wößmann L (2006) Class-size effects in school systems around the world: evidence from between-grade variation in TIMSS. Eur Econ Rev 50:695–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrik Jürges.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jürges, H., Schneider, K. Fair ranking of teachers. Empirical Economics 32, 411–431 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0112-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0112-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation