Skip to main content
Log in

A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the reliability of an instrumented patellofemoral (PF) stress-testing—the Porto Patellofemoral Testing Device (PPTD)—and validate the instrumented assessment method comparing to manual physical examination.

Methods

Eight asymptomatic volunteers underwent bilateral PF-instrumented examination with the PPTD and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess intra-rater reliability of the instrumented assessment methodology. Six patients with unilateral PF instability underwent physical examination and PPTD concomitantly with MRI. Manual examination was performed by two blinded surgeons and compared with PPTD test. Ligament stiffness was calculated and compared between injured and non-injured lower limbs.

Results

PPTD showed a pre-determined and reproducible stress-force application with excellent intra-rater agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.83–0.98). The manual exam was imprecise with variable examiner-dependent stress-force application. The PPTD resulted in greater lateral patellar translation (converted in quadrants) than manual exam for patients that have reached maximum translation force. Measurement of patellar position and displacement using PPTD was more accurate and precise than the visual estimation of translated quadrants by manual exam. Ligament stiffness curves showed no relevant changes in patellar displacement after 62 N.

Conclusion

The PPTD instrumented stress-testing is a valid device to quantify PF position and displacement with high intra-rater reliability, showing more accuracy, more precision and less variability than physical examination. This device provides an accurate and objective measure to quantify the patellar movement which can augment the physical examination procedures and assist clinicians in the management of decision-making and in the assessment of post-treatment outcomes of PF pathological conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PPTD:

Porto Patellofemoral Testing Device

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PF:

Patellofemoral

MPFL:

Medial patellofemoral ligament

PP:

Patellar position

ICC:

Intra-class coefficient

SEM:

Standard error of measurement

References

  1. Amis A, Firer P, Mountney J, Senavongse W, Thomas N (2003) Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee 10:215–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arendt EA, Dejour D (2013) Patella instability: building bridges across the ocean a historic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arendt EA, England K, Agel J, Tompkins MA (2017) An analysis of knee anatomic imaging factors associated with primary lateral patellar dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3099–3107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Askenberger M, Janarv PM, Finnbogason T, Arendt EA (2017) Morphology and anatomic patellar instability risk factors in first-time traumatic lateral patellar dislocations: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study in skeletally immature children. Am J Sports Med 45:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Denegar CR, Ball DW (1993) Assessing reliability and precision of measurement: an introduction to intraclass correlation and standard error of measurement. J Sport Rehabil 2:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S (2010) MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics 30:961–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietrich TJ, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CW (2016) Imaging of individual anatomical risk factors for patellar instability. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 20:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Egusa N, Mori R, Uchio Y (2010) Measurement characteristics of a force-displacement curve for chronic patellar instability. Clin J Sport Med 20:458–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fithian DC, Mishra DK, Balen PF, Stone ML, Daniel DM (1995) Instrumented measurement of patellar mobility. Am J Sports Med 23:607–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fithian DC, Neyret P, Servien E (2008) Patellar instability: the Lyon experience. Curr Orthop Pract 19:328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haj-Mirzaian A, Thawait GK, Tanaka MJ, Demehri S (2017) Diagnosis and characterization of patellofemoral instability: review of available imaging modalities. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 25:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Joshi R, Heatley F (2000) Measurement of coronal plane patellar mobility in normal subjects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:40–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaiser P, Schmoelz W, Schoettle P, Zwierzina M, Heinrichs C, Attal R (2017) Increased internal femoral torsion can be regarded as a risk factor for patellar instability—a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech 47:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kantaras AT, Selby J, Johnson DL (2001) History and physical examination of the patellofemoral joint with patellar instability. Oper Tech Sports Med 9:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolowich PA, Paulos LE, Rosenberg TD, Farnsworth S (1990) Lateral release of the patella: indications and contraindications. Am J Sports Med 18:359–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kujala UM, Kvist M, Osterman K, Friberg O, Aalto T (1986) Factors predisposing army conscripts to knee exertion injuries incurred in a physical training program. Clin Orthop Relat Res 210:203–212

    Google Scholar 

  19. LaPrade MD, Kallenbach SL, Aman ZS, Moatshe G, Storaci HW, Turnbull TL et al (2018) Biomechanical evaluation of the medial stabilizers of the patella. Am J Sports Med 46:1575–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leal A, Andrade R, Flores P, Silva FS, Espregueira-Mendes J, Arendt E (2019) High heterogeneity in in vivo instrumented-assisted patellofemoral joint stress testing: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:745–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leal A, Pereira R, Pereira H, Flores P, Silva FS, Espregueira-Mendes J (2015) Design of a new medical device for aiding clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral disorders. In: Flores P, Viadero F (eds) New trends in mechanism and machine science. Springer, New York, pp 633–641

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Leal A, Pereira R, Pereira H, Silva FS, Flores P, Espregueira-Mendes J (2014) Patellofemoral evaluation: do we need an objective kinematic approach? In: Gobbi A, Espregueira-Mendes J, Nakamura N (eds) The patellofemoral joint. Springer, New York, pp 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mountney J, Senavongse W, Amis A, Thomas N (2005) Tensile strength of the medial patellofemoral ligament before and after repair or reconstruction. Bone Jt J 87:36–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ota S, Nakashima T, Morisaka A, Ida K, Kawamura M (2008) Comparison of patellar mobility in female adults with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 38:396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reider B, Marshall JL, Warren RF (1981) Clinical characteristics of patellar disorders in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 9:270–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ridley TJ, Hinckel BB, Kruckeberg BM, Agel J, Arendt EA (2016) Anatomical patella instability risk factors on MRI show sensitivity without specificity in patients with patellofemoral instability: a systematic review. J ISAKOS 1:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchis-Alfonso V (2016) How to deal with chronic patellar instability: what does the literature tell us? Sports Health 8:86–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Skalley TC, Terry GC, Teitge RA (1993) The quantitative measurement of normal passive medial and lateral patellar motion limits. Am J Sports Med 21:728–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith TO, Clark A, Neda S, Arendt EA, Post WR, Grelsamer RP et al (2012) The intra-and inter-observer reliability of the physical examination methods used to assess patients with patellofemoral joint instability. Knee 19:404–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith TO, Davies L, Donell ST (2009) The reliability and validity of assessing medio-lateral patellar position: a systematic review. Man Ther 14:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Teitge RA, Faerber W, Des Madryl P, Matelic TM (1996) Stress radiographs of the patellofemoral joint. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:193–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tompkins MA, Arendt EA (2015) Patellar instability factors in isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions—what does the literature tell us? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 43:2318–2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tompkins MA, Rohr SR, Agel J, Arendt EA (2018) Anatomic patellar instability risk factors in primary lateral patellar dislocations do not predict injury patterns: an MRI-based study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wong Y-m, Ng GY (2008) The relationships between the geometrical features of the patellofemoral joint and patellar mobility in able-bodied subjects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 87:134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamada Y, Toritsuka Y, Horibe S, Nakamura N, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H et al (2018) Patellar instability can be classified into four types based on patellar movement with knee flexion: a three-dimensional computer model analysis. J ISAKOS 3:328–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely acknowledge: the Clinical Director of SMIC Dragão (Dr. Rui Aguiar) and the Head of the CMRR (Juta Ellerman) and their teams for the technical support in the imaging study; the University of Minnesota Professors Joan Bechtold and Jack Lewis for their valuable discussions on the validity study approach and the Department of Orthopedics Research Fund from University of Minnesota for the financial support for the validity study.

Funding

One author (AL) reports funding from FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia and FLAD—Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento, for the Ph.D. Studentship in Industry (SFRH/BDE/51821/2012) and Internship grant (Proj.16/2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AL, PF, FSS, JEM developed the PPTD device and protocol; AL carried out the PPTD procedure and measurements; BH, MT, EA, JEM validated and interpreted the PPTD measurements. AL and RA drafted the manuscript and performed the statistical analysis. AL, MT, EA, JEM designed the study. BH, MT, PF, FS, EA, JEM validated and critically reviewed the scientific content of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Espregueira-Mendes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No financial or non-financial competing interest exists for this manuscript. The manuscript was not influenced by personal or financial relationship with other people or organizations.

Ethical approval

Reliability study approval by the Institutional Review Board of Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre—FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence: protocol number #003/0015. Validity study approval by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board: protocol number #1507M7652.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leal, A., Andrade, R., Hinckel, B.B. et al. A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 389–397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05601-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05601-4

Keywords

Navigation