Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical comparison of meniscal repair devices with mattress suture devices in vitro

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

We report the load to failure in tensile testing of the MaxFire™ meniscal repair system (Biomet Inc, Warsaw, IN) and compare it to other current meniscal repair devices and mattress suture techniques. After creating a longitudinal tear in 42 one-year-old bovine menisci, 7 specimen groups defined by the meniscal repair device, suture, and/or mattress technique used for meniscal repair were randomly established: (Group 1: Fiberwire™ vertical mattress (VM), Group 2: Fiberwire™ horizontal mattress (HM), Group 3: FasT-Fix™ VM, Group 4: FasT-Fix™ HM, Group 5: RapidLoc™, Group 6: MaxFire™ VM, Group 7: MaxFire™ HM). After completing the repairs, the meniscal specimens were cyclically pre-loaded before load to failure testing was performed. The mean load to failure for each group was: Fiberwire VM (185 ± 41 N), Fiberwire HM (183 ± 36 N), FasT-Fix VM (125 ± 8 N), FasT-Fix HM (107 ± 29 N), RapidLoc (70 ± 12 N), MaxFire VM (145 ± 44 N), MaxFire HM (139 ± 50 N). An analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference in the mean load to failure (F = 8.31 P < 0.01). Statistically significant differences were seen between both Fiberwire groups verses FasT-Fix HM and Rapid-Loc (P < 0.05). Three modes of failure were observed: suture breakage (17/42, 40.5%), tissue failure (18/42, 42.9%), and knot failure (7/42, 16.7%). 2-0 Fiberwire™ VM and HM repairs had the highest load to failure of all groups tested. The load to failure for the MaxFire™ meniscal repair system is comparable to other available all-inside meniscal repair systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecht-Olsen P, Lind T, Kristensen G, Falkenberg B (1997) Failure strength of a new meniscus arrow repair technique: biomechanical comparison with horizontal suture. Arthroscopy 13:183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnoczky SP, Lavagnino M (2001) Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study. Am J Sports Med 29:118–123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asik M, Sener N (2002) Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Richards DP (2004) Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy 20:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Schroeder FA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Sutker MJ (2009) Biomechanical testing of new meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene suture. Arthroscopy 25:959–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boenisch UW, Faber KJ, Ciarelli M, Steadman JR, Arnoczky SP (1999) Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures. Am J Sports Med 27:626–631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borden P, Nyland J, Caborn DN, Pienkowski D (2003) Biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system with vertical mattress sutures and meniscus arrows. Am J Sports Med 31:374–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Joshi MD, Suh JK, Marui T, Woo SL (1995) Interspecies variation of compressive biomechanical properties of the meniscus. J Biomed Mater Res 29:823–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocabey Y, Chang HC, Brand JC Jr, Nawab A, Nyland J, Caborn DN (2006) A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus. Arthroscopy 22:406–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kocabey Y, Taser O, Nyland J, Doral MN, Demirhan M, Caborn DN, Sarban S (2006) Pullout strength of meniscal repair after cyclic loading: comparison of vertical, horizontal, and oblique suture techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:998–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta VM, Terry MA (2009) Cyclic testing of 3 all-inside meniscal repair devices: a biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 37:2435–2439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller MD, Kline AJ, Gonzales J, Beach WR (2002) Pitfalls associated with FasT-Fix meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 18:939–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miura H, Kawamura H, Arima J, Mawatari T, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Iwamoto Y (1999) A new, all-inside technique for meniscus repair. Arthroscopy 15:453–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Papageorgiou CD, Gil JE, Kanamori A, Fenwick JA, Woo SL, Fu FH (2001) The biomechanical interdependence between the anterior cruciate ligament replacement graft and the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med 29:226–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Post WR, Akers SR, Kish V (1997) Load to failure of common meniscal repair techniques: effects of suture technique and suture material. Arthroscopy 13:731–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rankin CC, Lintner DM, Noble PC, Paravic V, Greer E (2002) A biomechanical analysis of meniscal repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 30:492–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweigart MA, Zhu CF, Burt DM, DeHoll PD, Agrawal CM, Clanton TO, Athanasiou KA (2004) Intraspecies and interspecies comparison of the compressive properties of the medial meniscus. Ann Biomed Eng 32:1569–1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh SP, Evans SL, O’Doherty DM, Barlow IW (2001) Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Knee 8:151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zantop T, Eggers AK, Musahl V, Weimann A, Hassenpflug J, Petersen W (2004) A new rigid biodegradable anchor for meniscus refixation: biomechanical evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:317–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zantop T, Eggers AK, Musahl V, Weimann A, Petersen W (2005) Cyclic testing of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors: biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 33:388–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Green Mountain Orthopaedic Surgery, Berlin, VT, USA

    Brian C. Aros

  2. Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, 2050 Kenny Rd, Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43221, USA

    Angela Pedroza, Alan S. Litsky & David C. Flanigan

  3. Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA

    William K. Vasileff

  4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Alan S. Litsky

Authors
  1. Brian C. Aros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angela Pedroza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William K. Vasileff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alan S. Litsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David C. Flanigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Flanigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aros, B.C., Pedroza, A., Vasileff, W.K. et al. Mechanical comparison of meniscal repair devices with mattress suture devices in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 1594–1598 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1188-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1188-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation