Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laboratory fire ant colonies (Solenopsis invicta) fail to grow with Bhatkar diet and three other artificial diets

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various artificial diets have been used for rearing imported fire ants; however most of these diets include insect supplements. This study was designed to examine growth of red imported fire ant colonies (Solenopsis invicta Buren) on four artificial diets: a chemically undefined “oligidic” predator diet, two partly defined “meridic” diets utilized by Bhatkar and Whitcomb (Florida Entomol. 53: 229–232, 1970) and Dussutour and Simpson (Insect. Soc. 55: 329–333, 2008) for Solenopsis fire ants and Rhytido-ponera ants, respectively, and finally a completely chemically defined “holidic” diet utilized by Straka and Feldhaar (Insect. Soc. 54: 100–104, 2007a, Insect. Soc. 54: 202, 2007b Erratum) for carpenter ants. Crickets and sugar water were used as a standard diet. After 6 weeks, fire ant colonies fed crickets and sugar water were healthy and had grown considerably. In contrast, colonies fed the artificial diets showed little or no growth demonstrating that these diets are not suitable for rearing healthy fire ant colonies. Nevertheless, the holidic or entirely synthetic Straka diet may provide a suitable basis for further studies of fire ant dietary requirements because it resulted in modest production of all brood stages. We advise caution in using diets that mix sugar and protein into a single “all in one” diet because workers and brood have differing dietary requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloway T.M., Leighl A. and Ryckman D. 1991. Diet does not affect intercolonial fighting in Leptothoracine ants. Insect. Soc. 38: 189–193

  • Bailey L. 1952. The action of the proventriculus of the worker honeybee, Apis-mellifera L. J. Exp. Biol. 29: 310–327

  • Banks W.A., Lofgren C.S., Jouvenaz D.P., Stringer C.E., Bishop P.M., Williams D.F., Wojcik D.P. and Glancey B.M. 1981. Techniques for collecting, rearing, and handling imported fire ants. USDA, SEA, AATS-S-21, 9 pp

  • Bhatkar A.P. and Whitcomb W.H. 1970. Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Florida Entomol. 53: 229–232

  • Blüthgen N. and Feldhaar H. 2009. Food and shelter: how resources influence ant ecology. In: Ant Ecology (Lach L., Parr C. and Abbott K., Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 115–136

  • Buschinger A. and Pfeifer E. 1988. Effects of nutrition on brood production and slavery in ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 35: 61–69

  • Cassill D.L. and Tschinkel W. 1999. Regulation of diet in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. J. Insect Behav. 12: 307–328

  • Cook S.C., Eubanks M.D., Gold R.E. and Behmer S.T. 2010. Colony-level macronutrient regulation in ants: mechanisms, hoarding and associated costs. Anim. Behav. 79: 429–437

  • Dadd R.H. 1970. Arthropod Nutrition. In: Chemical Zoology. Arthro-poda Part A, vol 5 (M. Florkin and B.T. Scheer, Eds), Academic Press, New York, pp 35–96

  • Dougherty E.C. 1959. Introduction to axenic culture of invertebrate metazoa: A goal. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 77: 27–54

  • Dussutour A. and Simpson S.J. 2008. Description of a simple synthetic diet for studying nutritional responses in ants. Insect. Soc. 55: 329–333

  • Dussutour A. and Simpson S.J. 2009. Communal nutrition in ants. Curr. Biol. 19: 740–744

  • Dussutour A. and Simpson S.J. 2012. Ant workers die young and colonies collapse when fed a high-protein diet. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 279: 2402–2408

  • Eisner T. and Happ G.M. 1962. The infrabuccal pocket of a formicine ant: a social filtration device. Psyche 69: 107–116

  • Fielde A.M. 1904. Portable Ant-Nests. Biol. Bull. 7: 215–220

  • Gavilanez-Slone J.M. and Porter S.D. 2013. Colony growth of two species of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) reared with crickets and beef liver. Florida Entomol. 96: 1482–1488

  • Glancey B.M., Vander Meer R.K., Glover A., Lofgren C.S. and Vinson S.B. 1981. Filtration of microparticles from liquids ingested by the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Insect. Soc. 28: 395–401

  • Hintze J. 2001. NCSS 2001. NCSS, LLC., Kaysville, Utah

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

  • Howard D.F. and Tschinkel W.R. 1981. The flow of food in colonies of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta: a multifactorial study. Physiol. Entomol. 6: 297–306

  • Kaspari M., Yanoviak S.P. and Dudley R. 2008. On the biogeography of salt limitation: a study of ant communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 17848–17851

  • Keller L., Cherix D. and Ulloa Chacón P. 1989. Description of a new artificial diet for rearing ant colonies as Iridomyrmex humilis, Monomorium pharaonis and Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 36: 348–352

  • Khan A.R., Green H.B. and Brazzel J.R. 1967. Laboratory rearing of the imported fire ant. J. Econ. Entomol. 60: 915–917

  • Lapointe S.L., Evens T.J. and Niedz R.P. 2008. Insect diets as mixtures: optimization for a polyphagous weevil. J. Insect Physiol. 54: 1157–1167

  • Lubertazzi D., Aliberti Lubertazzi M.A., McCoy N., Gove A.D., Majer J.D. and Dunn R.R. 2010. The ecology of a keystone seed disperser, the ant Rhytidoponera violacea. J. Insect Sci. 10: 1–15

  • Macom T.E. and Porter S.D. 1995. Food and energy requirements of laboratory fire ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol. 24: 387–391

  • Mankowski M.E. 2002. Biology of the carpenter ants Camponotus vicinus (Mayr) and Camponotus modoc (Wheeler) in western Oregon. Thesis/Dissertation

  • Mankowski M.E. and Morrell J.J. 2004. Yeasts associated with the infrabuccal pocket and colonies of the carpenter ant Camponotus vicinus. Mycologia 96: 226–231

  • NCSS L. 2001. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, Utah

  • Oi D.H. 2006. Effect of mono- and polygyne social forms on transmission and spread of microsporidium in fire ant populations. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 92: 146–151

  • Pamilo P., Crozier R.H. and Fraser J. 1985. Inter-nest interactions, nest autonomy, and reproductive specialization in an Australian arid-zone ant, Rhytidoponera sp. 12. Psyche 92: 217–236

  • Petralia R.S. and Vinson S.B. 1978. Feeding in the larvae of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta: behavior and morphological adaptations. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71: 643–648

  • Petti J.M. 1998. The structure and function of the buccal tube filter in workers of the ant species Solenopsis invicta, Camponotus floridanus, Monomorium pharaonis. M.S. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 132 p

  • Porter S.D. 1988. Impact of temperature on colony growth and developmental rates of the ant, Solenopsis invicta. J. Insect Physiol. 34: 1127–1133

  • Porter S.D. 1989. Effects of diet on the growth of laboratory fire ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 62: 288–291

  • Porter S.D. and Tschinkel W.R. 1985. Fire ant polymorphism: the ergonomics of brood production. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 323–336

  • Resasco J. 2013. Environmental changes affecting dominant ant species. Environmental changes affecting dominant ant species. University of Florida, Gainesville

  • Sorensen A.A., Busch T.M. and Vinson S.B. 1983. Factors affecting brood cannibalism in laboratory colonies of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 56: 140–150

  • Sorensen A.A. and Vinson S.B. 1981. Quantitative food distribution studies within laboratory colonies of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Insect. Soc. 28: 129–160

  • Sorvari J. and Haatanen M.-K. 2012. Aspartame-based sweetener as a strong ant poison: Falsifying an urban legend? Sociobiology 59: 343

  • Straka J. and Feldhaar H. 2007a. Development of a chemically defined diet for ants. Insect. Soc. 54: 100–104

  • Straka J. and Feldhaar H. 2007b. Development of a chemically defined diet for ants (Erratum). Insect. Soc. 54: 202

  • Tennant L.E. and Porter S.D. 1991. Comparison of diets of two fire ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): solid and liquid components. J. Entomol. Sci. 26: 450–465

  • Valles S.M. and Porter S.D. 2013. Procedures to mitigate the impact of Solenopsis invicta virus 3 in fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) rearing facilities. Florida Entomol. 96: 252–254

  • Vanderzant E.S. 1974. Development, significance, and application of artificial diets for insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19: 139–160

  • Vinson S.B. 1968. The distribution of an oil, carbohydrate, and protein food source to members of the imported fire ant colony. J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 712–714

  • Vinson S.B. and Greenberg L. 1986. The biology, physiology, and ecology of imported fire ants. In: Economic Impact and Control of Social Insects (Vinson S.B., Ed), Praeger, New York. pp 193–226

  • Vogt J.T. 2003. Attractiveness and effectiveness of an artificial diet fed to hybrid imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta x richteri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomol. 86: 456–459

  • Weeks R.D., Jr., Wilson L.T., Vinson S.B. and James W.D. 2004. Flow of carbohydrates, lipids, and protein among colonies of polygyne red imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 105–110

  • Williams D.F., Lofgren C.S. and Lemire A. 1980. A simple diet for rearing laboratory colonies of the red imported fire ant. J. Econ. Entomol. 73: 176–177

  • Williams D.F., Vander Meer R.K. and Lofgren C.S. 1987. Diet-induced nonmelanized cuticle in workers of the imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 4: 251–259

  • Winston M.L. 1991. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the assistance provided by Darrell Hall (CMAVE, Gainesville, Florida) in helping with processing samples and feeding the colonies. We thank Ulrich Bernier, Alisa Huffaker, Rodney Nagoshi, Peter Teal, Steven Valles, Robert Vander Meer (all CMAVE), and Aaron Hirko (SFC, Gainesville) for sharing chemicals needed for the diets. We thank Robert Vander Meer (CMAVE), Deby Cassill (USF, Tampa, Florida), Andrea Dussutour (CNRS, Toulouse, France) and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Gavilanez-Slone.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 4316 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gavilanez-Slone, J., Porter, S.D. Laboratory fire ant colonies (Solenopsis invicta) fail to grow with Bhatkar diet and three other artificial diets. Insect. Soc. 61, 281–287 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-014-0353-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-014-0353-7

Keywords

Navigation