Skip to main content
Log in

Daily Smoking in Saskatoon: The Independent Effect of Income and Cultural Status

  • Quantitative Research
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Smoking prevalence in the Saskatoon Health Region (SHR) went from 23.9% in 2003 to 23.3% in 2005 to 26.2% in 2007. The prevalence of smoking within the SHR Aboriginal population is substantially higher than the rest of the population. The purpose of the current study was to determine the independent effects of Aboriginal cultural status and income status on daily smoking status.

Methods

Data from three cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2001, 2003, 2005) were merged with identical data collected by the SHR in 2007. All four cycles were random telephone survey samples.

Results

5948 participants (81.1% response rate) completed the survey. After cross-tabulation, Aboriginal cultural status and income were strongly associated with daily smoking status. Using logistic regression, the odds of daily smoking for residents of Aboriginal cultural status was reduced substantially from the initial odds of 3.43 to 2.26 after adjusting for income alone, and reduced further to 1.57 after full multivariate adjustment.

Conclusion

Given the association between smoking status and income status, future policies to reduce smoking prevalence should include generic policies to reduce income disparity as well as targeted strategies to improve the social conditions of Aboriginal people.

Résumé

Objectif

La prévalence du tabagisme dans la région sanitaire de Saskatoon (RSS) a reculé de 23,9 % en 2003 à 23,3 % en 2005, puis augmenté à 26,2 % en 2007. La prévalence du tabagisme dans la population autochtone de la RSS est considérablement plus élevée que dans le reste de la population. Notre étude visait à déterminer les effets indépendants du statut culturel autochtone et du revenu sur l’usage quotidien du tabac.

Méthode

Nous avons fusionné les données de trois cycles de l’Enquête sur la santé dans les collectivités canadiennes (2001, 2003, 2005) avec des données identiques recueillies par la RSS en 2007. Les quatre cycles utilisaient des échantillons aléatoires d’enquêtes téléphoniques.

Résultats

5 948 participants ont répondu aux enquêtes (taux de réponse de 81,1 %). Une tabulation en croix a mis au jour de fortes corrélations entre le statut culturel autochtone et le revenu et l’usage quotidien du tabac. L’analyse de régression logistique a toutefois considérablement réduit la probabilité pour les résidents de statut culturel autochtone d’être des fumeurs quotidiens: cette probabilité est passée de 3,43 (initialement) à 2,26 après rajustement selon le revenu, et à 1,57 après rajustement multivarié.

Conclusion

Étant donné l’association entre l’usage du tabac et le revenu, les futures politiques de réduction de la prévalence du tabagisme devraient inclure des politiques générales pour réduire l’écart dans les revenus, ainsi que des stratégies ciblées pour améliorer les conditions sociales des Autochtones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health Canada. Building and sustaining partnerships. A resources guide to address non-traditional tobacco use. Ottawa, ON: First Nations and Inuit Branch, Health Canada, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tjepkema M. The health of the off-reserve Aboriginal population. Health Rep 2002;13:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey, cycle 2.1. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey, cycle 3.1. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey, cycle 4.1. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saskatchewan Health. Healthier places to live, work and play: A population health promotion strategy for Saskatchewan. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Health, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Tobacco use among U.S. racial/ethnic minority groups — African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Hispanics: A report of the Surgeon General 1998. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Novotny TE, Warner KE, Kendrick JS, Remington PL. Smoking by Blacks and Whites: Socioeconomic and demographic differences. Am J Public Health 1988;78(9):1187–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey — Methodological overview. Health Rep 2002;13(3):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lemstra M, Neudorf C, Opondo J. Health disparity by neighbourhood income. Can J Public Health 2006;97:435–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lip-pincott Williams and Wilkins, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lantz PM, House JS, Lepkowski JM, Williams DR, Mero RP, Chen J. Socio-economic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: Results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA 1998;279(21):1703–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pomerleau J, Pederson LL, Østbye T, Speechley M, Speechley KN. Health behaviours and socio-economic status in Ontario, Canada. Eur J Epidemiol 1997;13(6):613–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, Fortmann SP. Socioeconomic status and health: How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health 1992;82(6):816–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laaksonen M, Prättälä R, Helasoja V, Uutela A, Lahelma E. Income and health behaviours. Evidence from monitoring surveys among Finnish adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:711–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: Comparing education and income. Prev Med 2005;40:756–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Lenthe FJ, Mackenbach JP. Neighbourhood and individual socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: The role of physical neighbourhood stressors. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mykletum A, Overland S, Aaro LE, Liabo HM, Stewart R. Smoking in relation to anxiety and depression: Evidence from a large population survey: The HUNT study. Eur Psychiatry 2008;23(2):77–84. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller M, Hemenway D, Bell NS, Yore MM, Amoroses PJ. Cigarette smoking and suicide: A prospective study of 300,000 male active duty Army soldiers. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:1060–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eaton WW, Muntaner C. Socioeconomic stratification and mental disorder. In: Horwitz AV, Scheid TL (Eds.), A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health: Social Contexts, Theories and Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frohlich KL, Ross N, Richmond C. Health disparities in Canada today: Some evidence and a theoretical framework. Health Policy 2006;79:132–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jarvis MJ. Why people smoke. BMJ 2004;328:277–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Lemstra PhD, PhD.

Additional information

At time of submission of manuscript. Current affiliation is Saskatoon Tribal Council, Saskatoon, SK

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemstra, M., Mackenbach, J., Neudorf, C. et al. Daily Smoking in Saskatoon: The Independent Effect of Income and Cultural Status. Can J Public Health 100, 51–54 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405493

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405493

Key words

Mots clés

Navigation