Skip to main content
Log in

Wetland credit sales as a strategy for achieving no-net-loss: The limitations of regulatory conditions

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland restoration and creation has been undertaken by the private sector, by public agencies, and by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in order to create wetland credits for sale to wetland permit recipients. The permit recipients use credits purchased from these commercial sales ventures as compensation for activities permitted under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of the United States and related state and local government programs. For commercial sales ventures to make a, positive contribution to achieving no-net-loss of wetlands, the credits sold must be ecologically successful, ventures must receive prices adequate to cover their credit production costs, and fill permit recipients must be willing and able to pay the resulting prices. From the perspective of the individual sales venture, costs and required prices are affected by 1) regulatory conditions governing when the wetland credits are sold, 2) the cost of gaining regulatory approval to sell credits, and 3) the future certainty of wetland credit demand. The consequences of these three factors for costs, prices, and availability of wetland credits are illustrated using a financial simulation of a hypothetical wetland restoration activity. A discussion of the results of the financial simulations and of barriers to competition among sales ventures leads to the conclusion that there are significant limits to achieving no net loss in the regulatory program through wetland credit sales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Brinson, M. 1995. The HGM approach explained. National Wetlands Newsletter 17(6):7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.L. (Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works), Wayland III, R.H. (Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Environmental Protection Agency) 1997a. A wetlands protection and mitigation joint statement before the U. S. House of Representatives; Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, subcommittee on water resources and environment. Washington, DC, USA. 9 December 1997.

  • Davis, M.L. 1997b. The new nationwide permit program. National Wetlands Newsletter 19 (2):1 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, C.P., D.M. Keating, and S. Stanwick. 1997. Wetland mitigation. The Appraisal Journal January:72–76.

  • Erwin, K.L., C.M. Smith, W.R. Cox, and R.P. Rutter. 1994. Successful construction of a freshwater herbaceous marsh in south Florida USA. p. 493–508.In W.J. Mitsch (ed.) Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, A. 1997. Testimony to the water resources and environment subcommittee of the house transportation and infrastructure committee on wetlands protection and mitigation banking. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Richmond, VA, USA. 9 December 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D.M. and C.C. Bohlen. 1994. Making sense of wetlands restoration costs. Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, University of Maryland, Solomon, MD, USA. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukoy, S.J. and L.W. Canter. 1995. Mitigation banking as a tool for improving wetlands preservation via section 404 of the clean water act. The Environmental Professional 17:301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusler, J.A. and M.E. Kentula. 1990. Wetland creation and restoration: The status of the science, Volumes I and II. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.In Wetlands Program Techinical Report No. 97:7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., P. Schlanger, and C. Murray. 1997. A decision well reasoned. National Wetlands Newsletter 19:2, 5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McElfish, J. 1997. The Tulloch rule is overturned. National Wetlands Newsletter 19(2):4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, A.M. 1997. Florida moves to mitigation banking. National Wetlands Newsletter 17(6):14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. 1993. Wetlands trading is a loser’s game, say ecologists. Science 260:1890–1892.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scodari, P., L. Shabman, and D. White. 1996. Wetlands credit markets: Theory and practice. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources. Fort Belvoir, VA, USA. TWR Report 95-WMB-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scodari, P. 1995. Implementing financial assurance requirements for commercial wetland mitigation banks. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources. Alexandria, VA, USA. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scodari, P. and R. Brumbaugh. 1996. Commercial wetland mitigation credit ventures: 1995 national survey. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources. Alexandria, VA, USA. IWR Report 96-WMB-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, P.E. 1997. An economic analysis of florida’s wetlands mitigation banking program. Prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Chapter 62–342 F. A. C.

  • Sutliff, J. 1998. Letter to Hon. S.L. Boehlert from Ohio Wetlands Foundation. 8 January 1998.

  • Want, W.L. 1989. Law of Wetlands Regulation. Clark Boardman Callaghan. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.F. and W.J. Mitsch. 1996. Functional assessment of five wetlands constructed to mitigate wetlands loss in Ohio, USA. Wetlands 16:436–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shabman, L., Stephenson, K. & Scodari, P. Wetland credit sales as a strategy for achieving no-net-loss: The limitations of regulatory conditions. Wetlands 18, 471–481 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161539

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161539

Key Words

Navigation