Abstract
Wetland restoration and creation has been undertaken by the private sector, by public agencies, and by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in order to create wetland credits for sale to wetland permit recipients. The permit recipients use credits purchased from these commercial sales ventures as compensation for activities permitted under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of the United States and related state and local government programs. For commercial sales ventures to make a, positive contribution to achieving no-net-loss of wetlands, the credits sold must be ecologically successful, ventures must receive prices adequate to cover their credit production costs, and fill permit recipients must be willing and able to pay the resulting prices. From the perspective of the individual sales venture, costs and required prices are affected by 1) regulatory conditions governing when the wetland credits are sold, 2) the cost of gaining regulatory approval to sell credits, and 3) the future certainty of wetland credit demand. The consequences of these three factors for costs, prices, and availability of wetland credits are illustrated using a financial simulation of a hypothetical wetland restoration activity. A discussion of the results of the financial simulations and of barriers to competition among sales ventures leads to the conclusion that there are significant limits to achieving no net loss in the regulatory program through wetland credit sales.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Brinson, M. 1995. The HGM approach explained. National Wetlands Newsletter 17(6):7–13.
Davis, M.L. (Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works), Wayland III, R.H. (Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Environmental Protection Agency) 1997a. A wetlands protection and mitigation joint statement before the U. S. House of Representatives; Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, subcommittee on water resources and environment. Washington, DC, USA. 9 December 1997.
Davis, M.L. 1997b. The new nationwide permit program. National Wetlands Newsletter 19 (2):1 13–17.
Edmonds, C.P., D.M. Keating, and S. Stanwick. 1997. Wetland mitigation. The Appraisal Journal January:72–76.
Erwin, K.L., C.M. Smith, W.R. Cox, and R.P. Rutter. 1994. Successful construction of a freshwater herbaceous marsh in south Florida USA. p. 493–508.In W.J. Mitsch (ed.) Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jennings, A. 1997. Testimony to the water resources and environment subcommittee of the house transportation and infrastructure committee on wetlands protection and mitigation banking. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Richmond, VA, USA. 9 December 1996.
King, D.M. and C.C. Bohlen. 1994. Making sense of wetlands restoration costs. Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, University of Maryland, Solomon, MD, USA. Working Paper.
Kukoy, S.J. and L.W. Canter. 1995. Mitigation banking as a tool for improving wetlands preservation via section 404 of the clean water act. The Environmental Professional 17:301–308.
Kusler, J.A. and M.E. Kentula. 1990. Wetland creation and restoration: The status of the science, Volumes I and II. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.In Wetlands Program Techinical Report No. 97:7.
Lee, G., P. Schlanger, and C. Murray. 1997. A decision well reasoned. National Wetlands Newsletter 19:2, 5.
McElfish, J. 1997. The Tulloch rule is overturned. National Wetlands Newsletter 19(2):4.
Redmond, A.M. 1997. Florida moves to mitigation banking. National Wetlands Newsletter 17(6):14–17.
Roberts, L. 1993. Wetlands trading is a loser’s game, say ecologists. Science 260:1890–1892.
Scodari, P., L. Shabman, and D. White. 1996. Wetlands credit markets: Theory and practice. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources. Fort Belvoir, VA, USA. TWR Report 95-WMB-7.
Scodari, P. 1995. Implementing financial assurance requirements for commercial wetland mitigation banks. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources. Alexandria, VA, USA. Working Paper.
Scodari, P. and R. Brumbaugh. 1996. Commercial wetland mitigation credit ventures: 1995 national survey. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources. Alexandria, VA, USA. IWR Report 96-WMB-9.
Sorenson, P.E. 1997. An economic analysis of florida’s wetlands mitigation banking program. Prepared for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Chapter 62–342 F. A. C.
Sutliff, J. 1998. Letter to Hon. S.L. Boehlert from Ohio Wetlands Foundation. 8 January 1998.
Want, W.L. 1989. Law of Wetlands Regulation. Clark Boardman Callaghan. New York, NY, USA.
Wilson, R.F. and W.J. Mitsch. 1996. Functional assessment of five wetlands constructed to mitigate wetlands loss in Ohio, USA. Wetlands 16:436–451.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shabman, L., Stephenson, K. & Scodari, P. Wetland credit sales as a strategy for achieving no-net-loss: The limitations of regulatory conditions. Wetlands 18, 471–481 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161539
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161539