Skip to main content
Log in

Penal austerity: Perceived utility, desert, and public attitudes toward prison amenities

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several states have reduced or eliminated a variety of amenities for prisoners. It is unclear, however, whether the general public supports making prisons harsher and more austere. Using a sample of 200 citizens from central Florida, the present study finds less support for prison austerity than commonly assumed. In addition, these preferences are linked to particular correctional goals, especially concerns about utility and desert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. S. (1997). Public support for correctional treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal.Prison Journal, 77, 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Turner, M. G., & Sundt, J. L. (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you’re-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes.Crime and Delinquency, 42, 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. R. (1998).The practice of social research (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidinnoto, R. J. (1994). Must our prisons be resorts?Reader’s Digest, 145(November), 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1980). Sentencing of convicted offenders: An analysis of the public’s view.Law and Society Review, 14, 223–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, M. J. (1997). Southern subculture of punitiveness? Regional variation in support for capital punishment.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J., Vandiver, M., & Dugan, P. H. (1994). A new look at public opinion on capital punishment: What citizens and legislators prefer.American Journal of Criminal Law, 22, 77–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. T., & Morris, E. (1998). What does the public really think? A survey of the general public’s perceptions of corrections yields some surprising results.Corrections Today, 59(1), 26–28, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T. R. (1994).Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims, and their communities. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Applegate, B. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.),Crime and justice: A review of research: Vol. 27 (pp. 1–79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumberland, J., & Zambie, E. (1992). General and specific measures of attitudes toward early release of criminal offenders.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24, 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (1998).Crime and punishment in America. New York: Metropolitan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida statistical abstract. (1999). Gainesville, FL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida.

  • Hurwitz, J., & Smithey, S. (1998). Gender and differences on crime and punishment.Political Research Quarterly, 51, 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingley, S. J. (1995). It’s the wave of the past: Getting tough (nasty) on criminals.American Jails, 9(4), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1987).Hard time: Understanding and reforming the prison. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. W., Bennett, K., & Flanagan, T. J. (1997). Getting tough on prisoners: Results from the National Corrections Executive Survey, 1995.Crime and Delinquency, 43, 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, A., & Wright, P. (1998). Prison TV: Luxury or management tool? In D. BurtonRose (Ed.),The celling of America: An inside look at the U. S. prison industry (pp. 48–54). Monroe, ME: Common Courage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. L., Rossi, P. H., & Simpson, J. E. (1986). Perceptions of justice: Race and gender differences in judgments of appropriate prison sentences.Law and Society Review, 20, 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nossiter, A. (1994, September 17). Making hard time harder: states cut jail TV and sports.New York Times, pp. A1, A10.

  • Sandys, M., & McGarrell, E. F. (1995). Attitudes toward capital punishment: Preference for the penalty or mere acceptance?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981).Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. (1996). Penal “austerity:” The doctrine of less eligibility reborn? In R. Matthews & P. Francis (Eds.),Prisons 2000 (pp. 74–93). New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundt, J. L., Cullen, F. T., Applegate, B. K., & Turner, M. G. (1998). The tenacity of the rehabilitative ideal revisited: Have attitudes toward offender treatment changed?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 426–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (1995). Public opinion on crime and punishment.Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. T., & Blankenship, M. B. (2000). The gender gap in capital punishment attitudes: An analysis of support and opposition.American Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. (1998). Prison weight-lifting is a nonsense issue. In D. Burton-Rose (Ed.),The celling of America: An inside look at the U.S. prison industry (pp. 45–47). Monroe, ME: Common Courage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, A. (1995). The extinction of inmate privileges.Corrections Compendium, 20(6), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon K. Applegate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Applegate, B.K. Penal austerity: Perceived utility, desert, and public attitudes toward prison amenities. Am J Crim Just 25, 253–268 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886849

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886849

Keywords

Navigation