Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ranking canadian universities

A case of controversy

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dowsett Johnston, A. (1994) ‘Measuring excellence.’MacLean’s, November 14, 107, 46, p.17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, P. (1993)Benchmarking and the University Mission. Measuring Up — Using Indicators to Manage Change. Proceedings of an AUCC Symposium. Ottawa: AUCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, V. (1994) ‘The story behind the rankings.’MacLean’s, November 14, 107, 46, p.30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kells, H.R. (1992)Self-Regulation in Higher Education: A Multi-National Perspective on Collaborative Systems on Quality Assurance and Control. Higher Education Policy Series 15. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewington, J. (1995) ‘Universities’ mission: no more missions.’The Globe and Mail. Toronto, May 8.

  • Lucier, P. (1992) ‘Performance indicators in higher education: lowering the tension of the debate.’Higher Education Management 4, 2, 204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. (1994) Letter addressed toMacLean’s, September 20.

  • Sibley, W.M. (1993) ‘The university in the 1990s: crisis or predicament?’The Canadian Journal of Higher Education 23, 1, 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Freitag, M. (1994) ‘Le MacDonald du savoir.’Le Devoir, Montréal, April 12.

  • Kells, H.R. (1993)The Development of Performance Indicators for Higher Education. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklin, J.L. (1995) ‘The hum of corporate buzzwords.’The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington, D.C., January 27.

  • Sizer, J. (1990) ‘Funding councils and performance indicators in quality assessment in the United Kingdom.’ In L.C.J. Goedegebuure, P.A.M. Maassen and D.F. Westerheijen (eds)Peer Review and Performance Indicators — Quality Assessment in British and Dutch High Education. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Lemma B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.L. (1991)Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Canadian University Education. Ottawa: AUCC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the School of Commerce and Business Administration at Laurentian University, 457 Cole Avenue, K2A 2B1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Charles H. Bélanger (Professor of Business Research Methods)

  2. the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada, 600-350 Alberta Street, K1R 1B1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Robert Davidson (Director of Research and Policy Analysis)

Authors
  1. Charles H. Bélanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Davidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bélanger, C.H., Davidson, R. Ranking canadian universities. Tert Educ Manag 3, 44–51 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679367

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679367

Keywords

Search

Navigation