Skip to main content
Log in

A direct demand model for downtown work trips

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article documents the development of a direct travel demand model for bus and rail modes. In the model, the number of interzonal work trips is dependent on travel times and travel costs on each available mode, size and socioeconomic characteristics of the labor force, and the number of jobs.

In estimating the models’ coefficients constraints are imposed to insure that the travel demand elasticities behave according to the economic theory of consumer behavior.

The direct access time elasticities for both transit modes are estimated to be approximately minus two, and the direct linehaul time elasticities approximately minus one. The cross-elasticities with respect to the travel time components are estimated to be less than the corresponding direct elasticities. In general, the time cross-elasticities are such that rail trip characteristics but not car trip characteristics affect bus travel, and car trip characteristics but not bus trip characteristics affect rail travel. The cost elasticities lie between zero and one-half.

Thus, the success of mass transit serving a strong downtown appears to depend on good access arrangements. This success can be confirmed with competitive linehaul speeds. The cost of travel appears to assume a minor role in choice of mode and tripmaking decisions.

In the paper, a comparison is also made between the predictive performance of the models developed and that of a traditional transit model. The results indicate that the econometric models developed attain both lower percent error and lower variation of the error than the traditional model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An Evaluation of Free Transit Service (1968). Cambridge: Charles River Associates, Inc. Domencich, T. A. et al. 1968. Estimation of Urban Passenger Travel Behavior;an Economic Demand Model. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Highway Research Board, January.

  • Kraft, G. and Wohl, M. (1967). “New Directions for Passenger Demand Analysis and Forecasting,”Transportation Research I: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,”Journal of Political Economy LXXXIV: 132–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Glauber, R. (1963). Investment Decisions, Economic Forecasting and Public Policy. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Model of Urban Passenger Travel Demand in the San Francisco Metropolitan Area (1967). Cambridge: Charles River Associates.

  • Morlok, E. K. (1970). “A Goal Directed Transportation Planning Model,”Transportation Research 4: 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W. and Shuldiner, P. (1962).An Analysis of Urban Traffic Demand. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talvitie, A. P. (1971).An Econometric Model for Downtown Work Trips. Ph.D. dissertation. Evanston, Illinois: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1966).Applied Economic Forecasting. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S.-(1971).Five Trip End Transit Model. M.S. thesis, Evanston, Illinois: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. and Jureen, L. (1953).Demand Analysis: A Study in Econometrics. Stockholm: Almquist and Wicksell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talvitie, A. A direct demand model for downtown work trips. Transportation 2, 121–152 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428556

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428556

Keywords

Navigation