Abstract
The evolving intermodal transportation network of North America is resulting in a concentration of traffic at a number of inland load centers. A wide range of services are involved in the organization and transfer of unitized freight, and it is postulated that the traffic concentration has been particularly favorable to the growth of services in the hub cities. This paper examines the way in which services have responded to the evolving intermodal system. It reports on a survey of producer services undertaken in Toronto, Winnipeg, Calgary, Columbus and Memphis. It reveals that despite the recent recession, producer services linked to intermodal transportation have been growing, but that the growth has come mainly from enterprises with a relatively small labor force. Many are branch offices of large national and multi-national corporations that are themselves directing the intermodal revolution. The evidence suggests that the vertical disintegration taking place in the broader service economy is not being repeated in the transport sector.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baxter R.E. and Allera S.V. 1980. Freight transport: shippers and forwarders.Transport and the Challenge of Structural Change. OECD, Paris, 459–501.
Bowman, R.J. 1992. Shippers to Carriers: Add value or Die.World Trade, 5: 70–73.
Coffey, W.J. 1992. The Role of Producer Services in Systems of Flexible Production. In Ernste H. and Meir V. (eds),Regional Development and Contemporary Industrial Response. Bellhaven Press, London, 133–146.
Crichton, J. 1992. The End of the Line?.Containerisation International. March, 30–34.
Daniels, P.W. 1985.Service Industries. Methuen, London.
Dunning J.H. and Morgan E.V. (eds.). 1971.An Economic Study of the City of London. George Allen & Unwin, London.
Erasmus University 1994. “Companies in the Port of Rotterdam Should Contemplate the Future”.International Newsletter Erasmus, No. 14, p. 13.
Jacobs, J. 1993. Fast forwarding.International Business, 6: 29–32.
Mahoney, J.H. 1985.Intermodal Freight Transportation. Eno Foundation, Westport.
Manalytics Inc. 1990.Double Stack Container Systems: impacts for US Railroads and Ports. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington.
Matthew M.R. 1993. The suburbanisation of Toronto Offices.The Canadian Geographer, 37: 293–306.
O'Connor, K. 1987. The Location of Services Involved With Trade.Environment and Planning A. 19: 687–700.
Sayer, A. 1989. Postfordism in question.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 13: 666–695
Scott, A.J. 1988. “Flexible Production Systems and Regional Development”.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 12: 171–186.
Seah, C. M. 1984.Freight Forwarding in Singapore. Singapore University Press, Singapore.
Semple, R.K. and Phipps, A.G. 1985. The Spatial Evolution of Corporate Headquarters within an Urban System.Urban Geography, 3: 258–279.
Slack B. 1986. Persistence and Change in the port service industry inProts et Mers J. Charlier (ed), Paradigme, Caen
Slack B. 1989. The Port Service Industry in an Environment of Change.Geoforum. 20:447–457.
Slack B. 1990. Intermodal Transportation in North America and the Development of Inland Load Centre.Professional Geographer. 42: 236–243.
Wong, K.L. 1982.Office Location Study of Shipping Companies. Undergraduate thesis, Department of Geography, University of Hong Kong.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slack, B. Services linked to intermodal transportation. Papers in Regional Science 75, 253–263 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406754
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406754