Abstract
The functions of snake mobbing by Siberian chipmunks were studied in the context of potencial benefit to the mobbers themselves. In experiment I, the threatening effect of the mobbing was examined, and following results were obtained. The snake retreated almost always into a shelter box when it was mobbed, and the time span from the beginning of the mobbing until the completion of the snake's retreat into the box was shorter when the snake was mobbed by 2 chipmunks than when mobbed by a single one. These results indicate that mobbing has a threatening effect against the snake that increases when more chipmunks mob. In experiment II, I examined whether chipmunks get information about the snake during the mobbing. The experiment showed that the chipmunks performed tail shakings after the mobbing more frequently at large snakes than at small ones, and also indicated that mobbing functions to obtain useful information about snakes. This study clarified that the snake mobbing by Siberian chipmunks provides benefits to the mobbers themselves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Curio, E. 1975 The functional organization of anti-predator behavior in the pied flycatcher. A study of avian visual perception.Anim. Behav. 23: 1–115.
Curio, E. 1978 The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z. Tierpsychol. 47, 175–183.
Kawamichi, M. & T. Kawamichi 1980 Process of independence of chipmunks pups.Shiretoko Shiryokan Hokoku 2: 23–32. (in Japanese)
Kobayashi, T. 1986 Why do chipmunks mob snakes?Anima 162: 100–104. (in Japanese)
Kobayashi, T. 1987 Does the Siberian chipmunk respond to the snake by identifying it?J. Ethol. 5: 137–144.
Kobayashi, T. 1994 The biological function of snake mobbing by Siberian chipmunks: I. Does it function as a signal to other conspecifics?J. Ethol. 12: 89–95.
Kobayashi, T. & M. Watanabe 1986 An analysis of snake-scent application behavior in Siberian chipmunks (Eutamias sibiricus asiaticus).Ethology 72: 40–52.
Kruuk, H. 1976 The biological function of gulls' attraction toward predators.Anim. Behav. 24: 146–153.
Owings, D.H. & S.C. Owings 1979 Snakedirected behavior by black-tailed prarie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus).Z. Tierpsychol. 49: 35–54.
Regelmann, K. & E. Curio 1986 Why do great tit (Parus major) males defend their brood more than females do?Anim. Behav. 34: 1206–1214.
Sherman, P.W., 1977 Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls.Science 197: 1246–1253.
Shields, S.F. 1984 Barn swallow mobbing: selfdefence, or parental care?Anim. Behav. 32: 132–148.
Tamura, N. 1989 Snake-directed mobbing by the Formosan squirrelCallosciurus erythraeus thaiwanensis.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 175–180.
West-Eberhard, M.J. 1975 The evolution of social behavior by kin selection.Q. Rev. Biol. 50: 1–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kobayashi, T. The biological function of snake mobbing by Siberian chipmunks: II. Functions beneficial for the mobbers themselves. J. Ethol. 14, 9–13 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350086
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350086