Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Observations with transurethral resection in association with continuous irrigation

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technique of TUR with continuous irrigation and suction is evaluated in the light of two years' experience. The advantages and shortcomings of the procedure are summed up and compared with those of traditional TUR. Its superiority to the lastnamed method is emphasized, and the pitfalls are pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Büttger, B.: Kurzbericht über die Anwendung von Dauerspülresektoskopen bei TUR.Urologe [B],17, 239 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castro, E. P.: Erfahrungen mit dem Iglesias-Resektoskop.Urologe [B],17, 240 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Futh, M., Waschulewski, F.: Die Anwendung des Dauerspülresektoskops (Iglesias) bei der transurethralen Resektion (TUR) des Blasenhalsadenoms.Z. Urol. Nephrol., 74, 667 (1981).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Geister, H.: Weitere Erfahrungen mit dem Dauerspülresektor “Modell Stade”.Urologe [B],17, 242 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iglesias, J. J., Stams, U. K.: Hämolyse ist nicht Ursache des TUR-Syndroms. Die Verwendung nichthämolysierender Spüllösungen kann es nicht verhindern.Urologe [A],14, 292 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iglesias, J. J., Stams, U. K.: Zur Prophylaxe des TUR-Syndroms.Urologe [A],14, 287 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iglesias, J. J., Sporer, A., Gellmann, A. C., Seebode, J. J.: New Iglesias resectoscope with continuous irrigation, simultaneous suction and low intravesical pressure.J. Urol., 114, 929 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iversen, R. H., Iversen, H. G., Christiansen, B.: Intravesical pressure during transurethral resection using Iglesias resectoscope with continuous irrigation and suction.Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 12 223 (1978).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerényi, V., Mohácsi, L.: Permanent vesical neck resections with the Iglesias resectoscope.Urol. Nephrol. Szle, 7, 152 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Madsen, P. D., Naber, K. G.: The importance of the pressure in the prostatic fossa and absorption of irrigating fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate.J. Urol., 109, 447 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Planz, C., Chiari, R.: Transurethrale Elektroresektion mit und ohne kontinuierliche Spülung im Vergleich.Urologe [B],17, 241 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reuter, H. J.: In: Atlas der urologischen Endoskopie in 2 Bänden. Risikoeinteilung des Patienten. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1980, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thiel, U., Krebs, W.: Grundsätzliches zur transurethralen Elektroresektion des Prostata-Adenoms heute.J. Urol., 71, 279 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University Medical School, Pécs

    J. Hübler & D. Frang

Authors
  1. J. Hübler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Frang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hübler, J., Frang, D. Observations with transurethral resection in association with continuous irrigation. International Urology and Nephrology 15, 37–41 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082105

Keywords

Search

Navigation