Skip to main content
Log in

Precursory and coseismic resistivity changes

  • Published:
pure and applied geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

More than 20 coseismic resistivity steps were observed by a resistivity variometer at a station about 60 km south of Tokyo during a six-year period of observation. The logarithmic magnitude of steps normalized to an epicentral distance (δ) of 100 km is linearly correlated to earthquake magnitude (M). The larger the earthquake magnitude is, the longer is the time required for completing a resistivity step.

Earthquakes, that produced a step, as plotted on anM-δ graph are clearly separated by a straight line

$$M = - 12.5 + 2.5\log _{10} \Delta $$

from those that did not produce a step, δ being measured in units of km. The straight line is approximately equivalent to a resolution of strain steps of the order of 10−9. As the smallest rate of resistivity change that can be observed by the variometer is 10−5 or so, it is apparent that mechanical strain is amplified by a factor of 104 or thereabouts when it is measured in terms of resistivity change.

Some of the steps are preceded by a premonitory effect. When long-period changes, mostly due to tidal loadings, are eliminated by a numerical filtration technique, precursors are brought out very clearly in a number of cases. The precursor time ranges from 1 to 7 hours and appears to be independent of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Yamazaki,Electrical conductivity of strained rocks (the 1 st paper), Laboratory experiments on sedimentary rocks, Bull Earthquake Res. Inst.44 (1965), 783–802.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Yamazaki,Electrical conductivity of strained rocks (the 2nd paper), Further experiments on sedimentary rocks. Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst.44 (1966), 1553–1570.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Yamazaki,Electrical conductivity of strained rocks (the 3rd paper), A resistivity variometer, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst.45 (1967), 849–860.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Yamazaki,Electrical conductivity of strained rocks (the 4th paper), Improvement of the resistivity variometer, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst.46 (1968), 957–964.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Yamazaki,Coseismic resistivity steps, Tectonophysics22 (1974), 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Rikitake andY. Yamazaki,Electrical conductivity of strained rocks (the 5th paper), Residual strains associated with large earthquakes as observed by a resistivity variometer, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst.47 (1969), 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Rikitake andY. Yamazaki,Strain step as observed by a resistivity variometer, Tectonophysics9 (1969), 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. J. Wideman andM. W. Major,Strain steps associated with earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer.57 (1967), 1429–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. G. Mason,Spatial dependence of time variations of the geomagnetic field in the range 24 hr to 3 min on Christmas Island, Geophys. Dept. Imp., Coll. Sci. Technol., London, Publ.63-3 (1963), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. H. Scholz, L. R. Sykes andY. P. Aggarwal,Earthquake prediction: a physical basis, Science181 (1973), 803–810.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. Whitcomb, J. D. Garmany andD. L. Anderson,Earthquake prediction: variation of seismic velocities before the San Fernando earthquake, Science181 (1973), 632–635.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Tsubokawa,On relation between duration of precursory geophysical phenomena and duration of crustal movement before earthquake, J. Geod. Soc. Japan19 (1973), 116–119 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamazaki, Y. Precursory and coseismic resistivity changes. PAGEOPH 113, 219–227 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01592912

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01592912

Keywords

Navigation