Skip to main content
Log in

The implicit welfare weights used when maximizing aggregate surplus

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggregate consumer and producer surplus is a special type of social welfare function. In this paper, we investigate how individual welfare weights and how the social marginal utility of an increase in an individual's income behave if one uses aggregate surplus as a measure of social welfare. Our conclusion is that aggregate surplus is an ethically unacceptable measure of social welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerbach, A. J. (1985): “The Theory of Excess Burden and Optimal Taxation”. InHandbook of Public Economics, edited by A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, A. (1980): “Consumer's Surplus and Income Redistribution”.Journal of Public Economics 14: 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and Donaldson, D. (1990): “A Review Article: The Case Against the Use of the Sum of Compensating Variations in Cost-Benefit Analysis”.Canadian Journal of Economics 23: 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. M. (1953): “Community Preference Fields”.Econometrica 21: 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. (1990): “Theoretical Progress in Public Economics: A Provocative Assessment”.Oxford Economic Papers 42: 6–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1976):Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. (Part A: Ethics and Welfare Economics, pp. 1085.) Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel. (Theory and Decision Library, Vol. 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehle, G. A. (1991):Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, J. (1984): “Optimal Taxation, the Compensation Principle and the Measurement of Changes in Economic Welfare”.Journal of Public Economics 24: 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, W. (1978): “The Possible Perverse Behavior of the Compensating Variation as a Welfare Ranking”.Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie/Journal of Economics 38: 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S., and Rubinfeld, D. Z. (1992):Microeconomics. New York: Macmillan. (2nd ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scafuri, A. J. (1986): “Measurable Welfare Change with Optimal Commodity Taxation”.Journal of Public Economics 29: 383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1989):The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1990):Intermediate Microeconomics. New York-London: W. W. Norton. (2nd ed.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to B. De Borger and to an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. Of course, all remaining errors are mine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pauwels, W. The implicit welfare weights used when maximizing aggregate surplus. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 57, 261–277 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234639

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234639

Keywords

Navigation