Skip to main content
Log in

Complementarity and substitutability in family members' time allocated to household production activities

  • Published:
Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reviews the concepts of complementarity and substitutability and the theoretical representations of these concepts used in demand analysis. It highlights difficulties encountered in empirical estimation of these relationships in the absence of adequate price data. A procedure for investigating these relationships in demand analysis under the assumption of constant relative prices is proposed. A model is formulated to test these relationships in family members' time allocated to household production activities. The data used in this analysis were collected in the Interstate Regional Research Project (NE-113), U.S.D.A. A simultaneous regression procedure is used. Results indicate that time of homemakers and their spouses are weakly complementary in several household maintenance activities, unpaid work, eating, shopping, recreation, organizational participation, physical and non-physical care of family members, and physical care of self. Homemaker's time in food preparation and spouse's time in physical care of self are found to be weakly substitutable. Relationships of substitutability are identified for each family member individually in his/her own discretionary activities. Discussion centers on implications of the model assumptions and use of residual analysis in applications other than demand analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R., & Bowley, A. L. (1935).Family Expenditure. London: King and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1974). Multivariate regression and simultaneous equation models when the dependent variables are truncated normal.Econometrica, 42, 999–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1979). The estimation of a simultaneous-equation tobit model.International Economic Review, 20, 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time.The Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berheide, C., Berk, S., & Berk, R. (1976). Household work in the suburbs: The job and its participants.Pacific Sociological Review, 19, 491–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G., Bird, G., & Scruggs, M. (1984). Determinants of family task sharing: A study of husbands and wives.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, W. K. (1988). Durables and wives' employment yet again.Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, W. K., & Wang, Y. (1990), Time together, time apart: An analysis of wives' solitary time and shared time with spouses.Lifestyles: Family and Economic Issues, 11, 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Family time use: An eleven-state urban/rural comparison (Bulletin VPI-2). (1981). Blacksburg: Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station.

  • Fox, K., & Nickols, S. (1983). The time crunch: Wife's employment and family work.Journal of Family Issues, 4, 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, L. (1980). Role-sharing couples: A study of egalitarian marriages.Family Relations, 29, 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafstrom, J., & Schram, V. (1983). Housework time of wives: Pressure, facilitators, constraints.Home Economics Research Journal, 11, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, F., & Schroeder, M. (1970). The effects of family and housing characteristics on time spent in household tasks.Journal of Home Economics, 61, 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. (1961).The laundry practice and equipment of a selected group of families, Erie, Pennsylvania, 1959. Unpublished master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1977).Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error.Econometrica, 47, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. (1985). Patterns of time use. In F. T. Juster & F. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 133–176). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., & Juster, F. T. (1985). Constraints and complementarities in time use. In F. T. Juster & F. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 439–470). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M., & Lehmann, D. (1981). Allocating discretionary time: Complementarity among activities.Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. (1986).Elements of econometrics (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S. B. (1970).The harried leisure class. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovingood, R., & McCullough, J. (1986). Appliance ownership and household work time.Home Economics Research Journal, 14, 326–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S. (1968).Time use in household tasks by Indiana families (Bulletin No. 837). Purdue University: Agricultural Experiment Station.

  • Maret, E., & Finlay, B. (1984). The distribution of household labor among women in dual-earner families.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R. (1972).The effects of education on the efficiency in consumption (Occasional Paper No. 116). New York: Columbia University Press, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1976). Some simple tests of the direct effect of education on preferences and on nonmarket productivity.Review of Economics and Statistics, 58, 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, F., & Olson, L. (1977).Specification and estimation of a simultaneous-equations model with limited dependent variables (Social Science Working Paper No. 149). California Institute of Technology.

  • Nickols, S., & Metzen, E. (1978). Housework time of husband and wife.Home Economics Research Journal, 7, 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L. (1978). The demand for leisure and money.Econometrica, 46, 1025–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R., & Wachter, M. (1975). The relevance of the household production function and its implications for the allocation of time.Journal of Political Economy, 83, 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S. (1953). Non-linear estimates of the Engel curves.The Review of Economic Studies, 20, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S., & Houthakker, H. (1955).The analysis of family budgets. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (1953).Practices and attitudes of homemakers in cleaning the living room. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., Converse, P., & Szalai, A. (1972). Everyday life in twelve countries. In A. Szalai (Ed.),The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries (pp. 113–144). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanik, M. (1981). Division of household work: A decade comparison -1967-1977.Home Economics Research Journal, 10, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanik, M. (1983). Repeated measure design: A time use application.Home Economics Research Journal, 12, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, P. R. (1953).A survey of current practices in home care and attitudes toward these practices as reported by 26 Ithaca homemakers. Unpublished master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, K. (1978).An economic analysis of employed wives' time allocation decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, G. (1980).Linear algebra and its applications. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H., & Neudecker, H. (1958). Substitution, complementarity, and the residual variation around Engel curves.Review of Economic Studies, 25, 114–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables.Econometrica, 26, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (1969). Homemaking still takes time.Journal of Home Economics, 61, 621–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K., & Gauger, W. (1973).The dollar value of household work (Bulletin No. 60). Ithaca: Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. (1940).Use of time in its relation to home management (Bulletin No. 734). Ithaca: Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G. (1982).The timing of economic activities: Firms, households, and markets in time-specific analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolrich, A., & Courtless, J. (1965). Water management for farm household activities.Journal of Home Economics, 57, 720–726.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Rosemary Key is an Assistant Professor, Department of Consumer Economics & Housing, 103 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. In addition to time management, her research interests include the psychological foundations of managerial activity, and how time use impacts consumer behavior. She received her Ph.D. from The Ohio State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Key, R. Complementarity and substitutability in family members' time allocated to household production activities. J Fam Econ Iss 11, 225–256 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987002

Key words

Navigation