Skip to main content
Log in

Time course of the Houseflies' landing response

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The landing response of stationary flying houseflies Musca domestica has been recorded on video tape. The leg movements were quantitatively evaluated. It could be demonstrated that:

  1. 1)

    only the first two pairs of legs are involved in the reaction (Fig. 1). Prothoracic tarsi are lifted beyond the head, mesothoracic tarsi are lowered and moved sidewards (Fig. 2a and b).

  2. 2)

    the movement of the tarsal tips is mainly due to an opening of one single joint per leg, i.e. the femurtibia joint of the prothoracic leg (Fig. 2c), and the coxa-femur joint of the mesothoracic leg.

  3. 3)

    the landing reaction is a fixed action pattern which does not seem to require further sensory input once it is released (Fig. 4d).

  4. 4)

    the landing responses to a light-off stimulus and to expanding patterns with different angular velocities are indistinguishable (compare Fig. 3a-c with Fig. 2a-c). The only parameter that is obviously dependent on the stimulus conditions, is the latency of the reaction (Fig. 4a-c).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borst A, Bahde S (1986) What kind of movement detector is triggering the landing response of the housefly? Biol Cybern (submitted)

  • Coggshall JC (1972) The landing response and visual processing in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus. J Exp Biol 57:401–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert H (1980) Orientation sensitivity of the visual movement detection system activating the landing response of the blowflies, Calliphora and Phaenicia: a behavioural investigation. Biol Cybern 37:235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach KF (1981) Habituation and sensitization of the landing response of Drosophila melanogaster. Naturwissenschaften 68:332

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LJ (1960) The landing response of insects. I. The landing response of the fly, Lucilla sericata, and other Calliphorinae. J Exp Biol 37:854–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG, Hengstenberg B, Biesinger R (1979) Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture in Drosophila. Biol Cybern 35:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez de Talens AF, Taddei-Ferretti C (1970) Landing reaction of Musca domestica: dependence of dimensions and position of the stimulus. J Exp Biol 52:233–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J, Abeln RG (1983) Spectral sensitivity of the landing blowfly. J Comp Physiol 150:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H (1982) Flow-field variables trigger landing in flies. Nature 297:147–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrhahn C, Hausen K, Zanker J (1981) Is the landing response of the housefly driven by motion of a flowfield? Biol Cybern 41:91–99

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borst, A. Time course of the Houseflies' landing response. Biol. Cybern. 54, 379–383 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355543

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355543

Keywords

Navigation